Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Cytogenetics and Molecular Genetics

Standardization of DNA isolation from low cell numbers for chimerism analysis by PCR of short tandem repeats

Abstract

Analysis of short tandem repeats (STR) by PCR analysis is routinely used in chimerism diagnostics to monitor donor engraftment and to diagnose relapse. Some applications require chimerism analysis of low cell numbers, but no standardized protocol is available for DNA isolation from 1000 to 30 000 cells. The EU-supported EuroChimerism Consortium (project QLRT-2001-01485) selected four different protocols for ‘small-scale’ DNA isolation, which were tested by six laboratories for their ability to recover reproducible amounts of good quality DNA, suited for PCR-based STR analysis. The protocols included two direct lysis methods with and without detergents and proteinase K, and two commercial column-based kits. The direct lysis method using detergents and proteinase K showed the highest DNA recovery and the best performance in the multiplex PowerPlex16 STR assay. DNA isolated with this method also showed the highest sensitivity in chimerism analysis using singleplex PCR reactions of EuroChimerism STR markers. Sensitivity was reached ranging from 1 to 20% of recipient cells in a donor background. In conclusion, the direct lysis method using detergents and proteinase K is a standardized DNA isolation method well suited for chimerism studies on low cell numbers.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baron F, Storb R . Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation as treatment for hematological malignancies: a review. Springer Semin Immunopathol 2004; 26: 71–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Friedrich W, Muller SM . Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for treatment of immunodeficiency. Springer Semin Immunopathol 2004; 26: 109–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Roux E, Helg C, Chapuis B, Jeannet M, Roosnek E . Evolution of mixed chimerism after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation as determined on granulocytes and mononuclear cells by the polymerase chain reaction. Blood. 1992; 79: 2775–2783.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Suttorp M, Schmitz N, Dreger P, Schaub J, Loffler H . Monitoring of chimerism after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation with unmanipulated marrow by use of DNA polymorphisms. Leukemia 1993; 7: 679–687.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bader P, Beck J, Frey A, Schlegel PG, Hebarth H, Handgretinger R et al. Serial and quantitative analysis of mixed hematopoietic chimerism by PCR in patients with acute leukemias allows the prediction of relapse after allogeneic BMT. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998; 21: 487–495.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. de Weger RA, Tilanus MG, Scheidel KC, van den Tweel JG, Verdonck LF . Monitoring of residual disease and guided donor leucocyte infusion after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation by chimaerism analysis with short tandem repeats. Br J Haematol 2000; 110: 647–653.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bader P, Kreyenberg H, Hoelle W, Dueckers G, Handgretinger R, Lang P et al. Increasing mixed chimerism is an important prognostic factor for unfavorable outcome in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation: possible role for pre-emptive immunotherapy? J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 1696–1705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bader P, Niemeyer C, Willasch A, Kreyenberg H, Strahm B, Kremens B et al. Children with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and increasing mixed chimaerism after allogeneic stem cell transplantation have a poor outcome which can be improved by pre-emptive immunotherapy. Br J Haematol 2005; 128: 649–658.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Offit K, Burns JP, Cunningham I, Jhanwar SC, Black P, Kernan NA et al. Cytogenetic analysis of chimerism and leukemia relapse in chronic myelogenous leukemia patients after T cell-depleted bone marrow transplantation. Blood. 1990; 75: 1346–1355.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bader P, Niethammer D, Willasch A, Kreyenberg H, Klingebiel T . How and when should we monitor chimerism after allogeneic stem cell transplantation? Bone Marrow Transplant 2005; 35: 107–119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lawler M, Humphries P, McCann SR . Evaluation of mixed chimerism by in vitro amplification of dinucleotide repeat sequences using the polymerase chain reaction. Blood. 1991; 77: 2504–2514.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thiede C, Florek M, Bornhauser M, Ritter M, Mohr B, Brendel C et al. Rapid quantification of mixed chimerism using multiplex amplification of short tandem repeat markers and fluorescence detection. Bone Marrow Transplant 1999; 23: 1055–1060.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nollet F, Billiet J, Selleslag D, Criel A . Standardisation of multiplex fluorescent short tandem repeat analysis for chimerism testing. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001; 28: 511–518.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lamb Jr LS, Robbins NF, Abhyankar S, Joyce M, Stetler-Stevenson M, Henslee-Downey PJ et al. Flow cytometric cell sorting combined with molecular chimerism analysis to detect minimal recurrent leukemia: good news and bad news. Bone Marrow Transplant 1997; 19: 1157–1161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lion T, Daxberger H, Dubovsky J, Filipcik P, Fritsch G, Printz D et al. Analysis of chimerism within specific leukocyte subsets for detection of residual or recurrent leukemia in pediatric patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Leukemia 2001; 15: 307–310.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thiede C, Lutterbeck K, Oelschlagel U, Kiehl M, Steudel C, Platzbecker U et al. Detection of relapse by sequential monitoring of chimerism in circulating CD34+ cells. Ann Hematol 2002; 81 (Suppl 2): S27–S28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Verhagen OJHM, Wijkhuis AJM, Van der Sluijs-Gelling AJ, Sczcepanski T, Van der Linden-Schreven BEM, Pongers-Willemse MJ et al. Suitable DNA isolation method for the detection of minimal residual disease by PCR techniques. Leukemia 1999; 13: 1298–1299.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. van der Burg M, Weemaes CM, Preijers F, Brons P, Barendregt BH, van Tol MJ et al. B-cell recovery after stem cell transplantation of Artemis-deficient SCID requires elimination of autologous bone marrow precursor-B-cells. Haematologica 2006; 91: 1705–1709.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pongers-Willemse MJ, Verhagen OJ, Tibbe GJ, Wijkhuijs AJ, de Haas V, Roovers E et al. Real-time quantitative PCR for the detection of minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia using junctional region specific TaqMan probes. Leukemia 1998; 12: 2006–2014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the European Union for support of the EuroChimerism Consortium (project QLRT-2001-01485).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M van der Burg.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van der Burg, M., Kreyenberg, H., Willasch, A. et al. Standardization of DNA isolation from low cell numbers for chimerism analysis by PCR of short tandem repeats. Leukemia 25, 1467–1470 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2011.118

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2011.118

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links