Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Allogeneic marrow transplantation in children with acute leukemia: careful comparison with chemotherapy alternatives required

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. Pinkel D . ‘Allogeneic marrow transplantation in children with acute leukemia: a practice whose time has gone’: twenty years later. Leukemia 2009; 23: 2189–2196.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. MacMillan ML, Davies SM, Nelson GO, Chitphakdithai P, Confer DL, King RJ et al. Twenty years of unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation for pediatric acute leukemia facilitated by the National Marrow Donor Program. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2008; 14 (9 Suppl): 16–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schultz KR, Bowman WP, Aledo A, Slayton WB, Sather H, Devidas M et al. Improved early event-free survival with imatinib in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Children's Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 5175–5181.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldsby RE, Liu Q, Nathan PC, Bowers DC, Yeaton-Massey A, Raber SH et al. Late-occurring neurologic sequelae in adult survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 324–331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eapen M, Rubinstein P, Zhang MJ, Stevens C, Kurtzberg J, Scaradavou A et al. Outcomes of transplantation of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood and bone marrow in children with acute leukaemia: a comparison study. Lancet 2007; 369: 1947–1954.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lawson SE, Harrison G, Richards S, Oakhill A, Stevens R, Eden OB et al. The UK experience in treating relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a report on the medical research council UKALLR1 study. Br J Haematol 2000; 108: 531–543.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Malempati S, Gaynon PS, Sather H, La MK, Stork LC . Outcome after relapse among children with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Children's Oncology Group study CCG-1952. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 5800–5807.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eapen M, Raetz E, Zhang MJ, Muehlenbein C, Devidas M, Abshire T et al. Outcomes after HLA-matched sibling transplantation or chemotherapy in children with B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia in a second remission: a collaborative study of the Children's Oncology Group and the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. Blood 2006; 107: 4961–4967.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Schrauder A, Reiter A, Gadner H, Niethammer D, Klingebiel T, Kremens B et al. Superiority of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation compared with chemotherapy alone in high-risk childhood T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results from ALL-BFM 90 and 95. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 5742–5749.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M A Pulsipher.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pulsipher, M., Hunger, S., Gamis, A. et al. Allogeneic marrow transplantation in children with acute leukemia: careful comparison with chemotherapy alternatives required. Leukemia 24, 1212–1216 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2010.72

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2010.72

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links