Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol Review
  • Published:

Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Should no good deed go unpunished?

Lab Animal volume 40, pages 338–339 (2011)Cite this article

Stein took action to make a bad situation with aggressive mice better. She did this with the best intentions and with genuine concern for animals. Should the IACUC deal aggressively with her noncompliance? Or should this good deed go unpunished?

Stein anesthetized an injured animal, enucleated one eye and treated that animal appropriately. Only then did she contact the weekend call veterinarian. She had the expertise and approval to anesthetize mice and treat wounds, just not under these circumstances. After the fact, the veterinarian agreed in principle with the treatment. However, the injuries were not so severe that immediate treatment precluded veterinary consultation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals 114 (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2011).

  2. Public Health Service. Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals Section IV, B, 4: Functions of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. (US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, 1986, amended 2002).

  3. Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare. Guidance on Confirming Appropriate Charges to NIH Awards during Periods of Non-compliance for Activities Involving Animals. Notice NOT-OD-10-081. (National Institutes of Health, Washington, DC, 15 April 2010). http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-10-081.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nelson is Professor of Anatomy and Neurobiology and Associate Vice Chancellor for Research at The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN.,

    Randall J. Nelson

Authors
  1. Randall J. Nelson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nelson, R. Response to Protocol Review Scenario: Should no good deed go unpunished?. Lab Anim 40, 338–339 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban1111-338b

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban1111-338b

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing