Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Environmental Enrichment Options for Laboratory Rats and Mice

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1
Figure 2: 'Nestlets' are pre-sterilized pieces of compressed cotton fibers.
Figure 3: The 'Mouse House' is a cage insert molded of autoclave-safe, transparent red plastic.
Figure 4: The 'Mouse Igloo' cage insert, available in autoclave-safe transparent red or amber plastic, provides mice with a place to hide.
Figure 5: The 'Shepherd Shack' is cage insert composed of autoclavable paper.
Figure 6


  1. 1

    Wolfensohn, S.E. & Lloyd, M.H. Handbook of Laboratory Animal Management and Welfare 2nd end 61–64 (Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Olsson, I.A. & Dahlborn, K. Improving housing conditions for laboratory mice: a review of “environmental enrichment”. Lab. Anim. 36(3), 243–270 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Patterson-Kane, E.G. Environmental enrichment for laboratory rats: a review. Anim. Technol. 52(2), 77–84 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Poole, T. & Dawkins, M.S. in UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals 7th edn (ed Poole, T.) (Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Key, D. & Hewett, A. Developing and testing a novel cage insert, the “Mouse House”, designed to enrich the lives of laboratory mice without adversely affecting the science. Anim. Technol. Welf. 1(2), 55–64 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Manser, C.E., Broom, D.M., Overend, P. & Morris, T.H. Investigations into the preferences of laboratory rats for nest-boxes and nesting materials. Lab. Anim. 32(1), 23–35 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Manser, C.E. The Assessment of Stress in Laboratory Animals (RSPCA, Horsham, UK, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Van Loo, P.L.P., Kruitwagen, C.L.J.J., Van Zutphen, L.F.M., Koolhaas, J.M. & Baumans, V. Modulation of aggression in male mice: influence of group size and cage size. Anim. Welf. 9(3), 281–295 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Hawkins, P. et al. Individually ventilated cages and rodent welfare: report of the 2002 RSPCA/UFAW rodent welfare group meeting. Anim. Technol. Welf. 2(1), 23–34 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Home office. Code of practice for the housing and care of animals used in scientific procedures. (7 February 1989)

  11. 11

    Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, National Research Council. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals 36–38 (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1996)

  12. 12

    Nevison, C.M., Hurst, J.L. & Barnard, C.J. Strain-specific effects of cage enrichment in male laboratory mice (Mus musculus). Anim. Welf. 8(4), 361–379 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Manser, C.E., Broom, D.M., Overend, P. & Morris, T.H. Operant studies to determine the strength of preference in laboratory rats for nest-boxes and nesting material. Lab. Anim. 32(1), 36–41 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Hurst, J.L., Barnard, C.J., Nevison, C.M. & West, C.D. Housing and welfare in laboratory rats: the welfare implications of social isolation and social contact among males. Anim. Welf. 6(4), 329–347 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Ballard, T. Rat housing into the Millennium. Anim. Technol. 51(2), 119–123 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Wallace, R.J. Tail-hoarding in the albino rat. Anim. Behav. 24, 176–180 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Burge, T. & Fozard, L.A. Impact of changed cage structuring to physiological parameters in athymic nude nu/nu mice. Poster at GV Solas 2003, Göttingen, Germany.

  18. 18

    Patterson-Kane, E.G., Harper, D.N. & Hunt, M. The cage preference of laboratory rats. Lab. Anim. 35(1), 74–79 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Van de Weerd, H.A., Van Loo, P.L., Van Zutphen, L.F., Koolhaas, J.M. & Baumans, V. Preferences for nesting material as environmental enrichment for laboratory mice. Lab. Anim. 31(2), 133–143 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Kinder, E.F. A study of the nest-building activity of the albino rat. J. Exp. Zool. 47, 117–161 (1927).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Truszkowsky, J. Utilisation of nest boxes by rodents. Acta Theriol. 19(29), 441–452 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Birke, L.I., D'Udine, B. & Albonetti, M.E. Exploratory behavior of two species of murid rodents, Acomys cahirinus and Mus musculus: a comparative study. Behav. Neural Biol. 43(2), 143–161 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Spalding, J. Influence of the visible color spectrum on activity in mice. Lab. Anim. Care 19(1), 50–54 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Smith, M.M. & Hargaden, M. Developing a rodent enrichment program. Lab Anim. (NY) 30(8), 36–41 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Van Loo, P.L.P. et al. The use of the Shepherd Shack/DesRes nest box by laboratory mice, preferences and consequences for animal welfare. Report from Lillico.

  26. 26

    Baumans, V., Schlingmann, F., Vonch, M. & Van Lith, H.A. Individually ventilated cages: beneficial for mice and men? Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 41(1), 13–19 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Bantin, G.C. & Sanders, P.D. Animal caging: is bigger necessarily better? Anim. Technol. 40(1), 45–54 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Higgins, J. & Eagle, D., Enrichment in a Neurosurgical Environment. Report of the 1999 RSPCA/UFAW Rodent Welfare Group Meeting, MRC Cambridge Centre for Brain Repair.

  29. 29

    van der Harst, J., Cubitt, S. & Ottesen, J.L. Novel designs for enriching rat cages. Scanbur BK Symposium 2003, Ringsted, Denmark.

  30. 30

    Nelson, K. & Patterson-Kane, E.G. Using animal preference to develop enriched caging for rats. Anim. Technol. Welf. 2(2), 85 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Key, D. A practical assessment of an enriched cage for rats. IAT Congress 2003, Cyprus.

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Key FIAT.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Key, D. Environmental Enrichment Options for Laboratory Rats and Mice. Lab Anim 33, 39–44 (2004).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links