Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Resource
  • Published:

The presence and management of contaminants in non-certified, agriculturally sourced food items used as enrichment for laboratory animals

Abstract

One enrichment strategy for laboratory animals is the provision of food variety and foraging opportunities. Fresh agricultural items, including produce or packaged human food items, provide variation in palatability, texture and complexity and can therefore be used as enrichment for lab animals. But concerns are often raised that these food items might sometimes carry contaminants that could affect research subjects and confound experimental results. The author discusses the potential for agriculturally sourced foods used as enrichment for lab animals to be contaminated with mycotoxins, microorganisms and pesticide residues and the effects these contaminants might have on lab animals. He also suggests strategies for reducing the risk of contamination.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals 8th edn. (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2011).

  2. Vodela, J.K., Lenz, S.D., Renden, J.A., McElhenney, W.H. & Kemppainen, B.W. Drinking water contaminants (arsenic, cadmium, lead, benzene, and trichloroethylene). 2. Effects on reproductive performance, egg quality, and embryo toxicity in broiler breeders. Poult. Sci. 76, 493–500 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Finamore, A. et al. Novel approach for food safety evaluation. Results of a pilot experiment to evaluate organic and conventional foods. J. Agric. Food Chem. 52, 7425–7431 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bennett, J.W. & Klich, M. Mycotoxins. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 16, 497–516 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Toxic substances and nutritional factors in Roots, Tubers, Plantains and Bananas in Human Nutrition (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 1990).

  6. Foodborne Illness, Foodborne Disease, (sometimes called “Food Poisoning”) (Centers for Disease Prevention and Control, Atlanta, GA, 23 September 2014). http://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/facts.html.

  7. Van Leeuwen, P.A. et al. Clinical significance of translocation. Gut 35, S28–S34 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gallo, J., Kolár, M., Novotný, R., Riháková, P. & Tichá, V. Pathogenesis of prosthesis-related infection. Biomed. Pap. Med. Fac. Univ. Palacky Olomouc Czech. Repub. 147, 27–35 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. MacCannell, T. et al. Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) Guideline for the prevention and control of norovirus gastroenteritis outbreaks in healthcare settings. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 32, 939–969 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Asahara, T., Nomoto, K., Shimizu, K., Watanuki, M. & Tanaka, R. Increased resistance of mice to Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection by synbiotic administration of Bifidobacteria and transgalactosylated oligosaccharides. J. Appl. Microbiol. 91, 985–996 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Teunis, P.F. et al. Dose-response modeling of Salmonella using outbreak data. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 144, 243–249 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hara-Kudo, Y. & Takatori, K. Contamination level and ingestion dose of foodborne pathogens associated with infections. Epidemiol. Infect. 139, 1505–1510 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bogdanov, S., Jurendic, T., Sieber, R. & Gallmann, P. Honey for nutrition and health: a review. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 27, 677–689 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Keikotlhaile, B.M. & Spanoghe, P. in Pesticides—Formulations, Effects, Fate (ed. Stoytcheva, M.) 243–252 (InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pesticide Monitoring Program - FY 2008 (US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, 2010). http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Food/FoodSafety/FoodContaminantsAdulteration/Pesticides/ResidueMonitoringReports/UCM230537.pdf.

  16. Juraske, R., Mutel, C.L., Stoessel, F. & Hellweg, S. Life cycle human toxicity assessment of pesticides: comparing fruit and vegetable diets in Switzerland and the United States. Chemosphere 77, 939–45 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kar, A., Mandal, K. & Singh, B. Decontamination of chlorantraniliprole residues on cabbage and cauliflower through household processing methods. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 88, 501–506 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schattenberg, H.J. 3rd, Geno, P.W., Hsu, J.P., Fry, W.G. & Parker, R.P. Effect of household preparation on levels of pesticide residues in produce. J. AOAC Int. 79, 1447–1453 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith, S., Dunbar, M., Tucker, D. & Schaffner, D.W. Efficacy of a commercial produce wash on bacterial contamination of lettuce in a food service setting. J. Food Prot. 66, 2359–2361 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Samadi, N., Abadian, N., Bakhtiari, D., Fazeli, M.R. & Jamalifar, H. Efficacy of detergents and fresh produce disinfectants against microorganisms associated with mixed raw vegetables. J. Food Prot. 72, 1486–1490 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. López-Gálvez, F., Allende, A., Selma, M.V. & Gil, M.I. Prevention of Escherichia coli cross-contamination by different commercial sanitizers during washing of fresh-cut lettuce. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 133, 167–171 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Das, B. & Kim, J.G. Microbial quality and safety of fresh-cut broccoli with different sanitizers and contact times. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 20, 363–369 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shirron, N. et al. A comparative study assaying commonly used sanitizers for antimicrobial activity against indicator bacteria and a Salmonella typhimurium strain on fresh produce. J. Food Prot. 72, 2413–2417 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pangloli, P. & Hung, Y.C. Efficacy of slightly acidic electrolyzed water in killing or reducing Escherichia coli O157:H7 on iceberg lettuce and tomatoes under simulated food service operation conditions. J. Food Sci. 76, M361–M366 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dale M. Cooper.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cooper, D. The presence and management of contaminants in non-certified, agriculturally sourced food items used as enrichment for laboratory animals. Lab Anim 44, 60–64 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.664

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.664

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing