Abstract
The ethical acceptability of animal research is typically evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Legislation such as Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes provides guidance for ethical evaluation of animal use proposals but does not dictate the outcome, leaving this determination to the ethical review committees of individual institutions. The authors assess different ethics models and how these are reflected in the guidelines of Directive 2010/63/EU. They also describe a matrix for carrying out harm–benefit analyses of animal use proposals, which they identified by examining the practices of three ethical review committees in the Netherlands. Finally, they discuss how this matrix can be applied by ethical review committees at other institutions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
We are sorry, but there is no personal subscription option available for your country.
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Franco, N.H. Animal experiments in biomedical research: a historical perspective. Animals 3, 238–273 (2013).
European Union. Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. Official Journal of the European Union L276, 33–79 (2010).
Brown, M.T. Working Ethics: Strategies for Decision Making and Organizational Responsibility (Jossey-Bass Inc., San Francisco, 1990).
Toulmin, S. The tyranny of principles. The Hastings Center Report 11, 31–39 (1981).
Wet op de dierproeven 12 September 2014. http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0003081/geldigheidsdatum_12-09-2014.
Russell, W.M.S. & Burch, R.L. The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique (Methuen, London, 1959).
Bateson, P. When to experiment on animals. New Scientist 109, 30–32 (1986).
Theune, E. & de Cock Buning, T. Grenzen aan dierexperimenteel onderzoek: toetsingsprocedure. Proefdier en Wetenschap vol. 4 (Rijksuniversiteit Leiden, Leiden, the Netherlands, 1991).
Porter, D.G. Ethical scores for animal experiments. Nature 356, 101–102 (1992).
Stafleu, F.R., Tramper, R., Vorstenbosch, J. & Joles, J.A. The ethical acceptability of animal experiments: proposal for a system to support decision-making. Lab. Anim. 33, 295–303 (1999).
Voipio, H-M., Hirsjarvi, P., Ritskes-Hoitinga, M. & Nevalainen, T. in Proceedings of 9th FELASA Symposium: 4–17 June 2004, Nantes, France (eds. Gamble, M.R. & Millington, S.) 60–62 (Laboratory Animals Ltd., London, 2004).
European Union. National Competent Authorities for the implementation of Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. A working document on Project Evaluation and Retrospective Assessment. 18–19 September 2013, Brussels, Belgium.
Innes, C.C. Ethical regulation and animal science: why animal behaviour is not so special. Anim. Behav. 74, 15e22 (2007).
Bout, H.J. in De Weging Gewogen: Beschouwingen Over Ethiek en Dierproeven (eds. Swart, J., Jonker, M. & Tramper, R.) 79–87 (DAMON, Budel, the Netherlands, 2009).
Directive 2010/63 Annex VIII; COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION of 14 November 2012: establishing a common format for the submission of the information pursuant to Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes (2012/707/EU).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bout, H., van Vlissingen, J. & Karssing, E. Evaluating the ethical acceptability of animal research. Lab Anim 43, 411–414 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.572
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.572
