Abstract
Pharmacological agents are commonly administered to mice through multiple intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections. The i.p. route of administration is usually considered safe, but questions of animal welfare arise when protocols require that multiple injections be given to the same animal. IACUCs must consider the potential risks associated with multiple i.p. injections in order to determine the maximum number of injections an animal can receive within a study protocol, but there are no published studies of such potential risks. The authors investigated the effects of 30 daily i.p. saline injections on the behavior, body condition, weight, fecal corticosterone levels, hematology and pathology of female adult mice. Results indicate that multiple i.p. injections do not cause any ill effects in mice.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
We are sorry, but there is no personal subscription option available for your country.
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Morton, D.B. et al. Refining procedures for the administration of substances. Report of the BVAAWF/FRAME/RSPCA/UFAW Joint Working Group on Refinement. British Veterinary Association Animal Welfare Foundation/Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments/Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals/Universities Federation for Animal Welfare. Lab. Anim. 35, 1–41 (2001).
Shimizu, S. in The Laboratory Mouse (ed. Hedrich, H.) 527–541 (Academic Press, Oxford, UK, 2004).
van der Zwaal, E.M., Luijendijk, M.C., Adan, R.A. & la Fleur, S.E. Olanzapine-induced weight gain: chronic infusion using osmotic minipumps does not result in stable plasma levels due to degradation of olanzapine in solution. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 585, 130–136 (2008).
Löscher, W. The pharmacokinetics of antiepileptic drugs in rats: consequences for maintaining effective drug levels during prolonged drug administration in rat models of epilepsy. Epilepsia 48, 1245–1258 (2007).
Gaines Das, R. & North, D. Implications of experimental technique for analysis and interpretation of data from animal experiments: outliers and increased variability resulting from failure of intraperitoneal injection procedures. Lab. Anim. 41, 312–320 (2007).
Gad, S.C. in Animal Models in Toxicology 2nd edn. (ed. Gad, S.C.) 58–72 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2007).
Claassen, V. (ed.) in Techniques in the Behavioral and Neural Sciences, Vol. 12 (ed. Huston, J.P.) 1–486 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1994).
Diehl, K.H. et al. A good practice guide to the administration of substances and removal of blood, including routes and volumes. J. Appl. Toxicol. 21, 15–23 (2001).
Nebendahl, K. in The Laboratory Rat (ed. Krinkle, G.J.) Ch. 24, 463–484 (Academic Press, London, UK, 2000).
Svendsen, O., Kok, L. & Lauritzen, B. Nociception after intraperitoneal injection of a sodium pentobarbitone formulation with and without lidocaine in rats quantified by the expression of neuronal c-fos in the spinal cord—a preliminary study. Lab. Anim. 41, 197–203 (2006).
Turner, P.V., Brabb, T., Pekow, C. & Vasbinder, M.A. Administration of substances to laboratory animals: routes of administration and factors to consider. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 50, 600–613 (2011).
Arioli, V. & Rossi, E. Errors related to different techniques of intraperitoneal injection in mice. Appl. Microbiol. 19, 704–705 (1970).
Miner, N.A., Koehler, J. & Greenaway, L. Intraperitoneal injection in mice. Appl. Microbiol. 17, 250–251 (1969).
Steward, J.P., Ornellas, E.P., Beernink, K.D. & Northway, W.H. Errors in the technique of intraperitoneal injection of mice. Appl. Microbiol. 16, 1418–1419 (1968).
Wiles, S., Crepin, V.F., Childs, G., Frankel, G. & Kerton, A. Use of biophotonic imaging as a training aid for administration of substances in laboratory rodents. Lab. Anim. 41, 321–328 (2007).
Dörr, W. & Weber-Frisch, M. Short-term immobilization of mice by methohexitone. Lab. Anim. 33, 35–40 (1999).
Groman, E.V. & Reinhardt, C.P. Method to quantify tail vein injection technique in small animals. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 43, 35–38 (2004).
Public Health Service. Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, 1986; reprinted 2002).
Institute for Laboratory Animal Research, National Research Council. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2010).
Ullman-Culleré, M.H. & Foltz, C.J. Body condition scoring: a rapid and accurate method for assessing health status in mice. Lab. Anim. Sci. 49, 319–323 (1999).
Advani, T., Koek, W. & Hensler, J.G. Gender differences in the enhanced vulnerability of BDNF+/- mice to mild stress. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 12, 583–538 (2009).
Baumans, V. in UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals 7th edn. (ed. Poole, T.B.) Vol. 1 300–301 (Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 1999).
Giamberardino, M.A., Valente, R., de Bigontina, P. & Vecchiet, L. Artificial ureteral calculosis in rats: behavioural characterization of visceral pain episodes and their relationship with referred lumbar muscle hyperalgesia. Pain 61, 459–469 (1995).
Jacobsen, K.R., Kalliokoski, O., Teilmann, A.C., Hau, J. & Abelson, K.S. Postsurgical food and water consumption, fecal corticosterone metabolites, and behavior assessment as noninvasive measures of pain in vasectomized BALB/c mice. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 51, 69–75 (2012).
Roughan, J.V. & Flecknell, P.A. Evaluation of a short duration behaviour-based post-operative pain scoring system in rats. Eur. J. Pain 7, 397–406 (2003).
Stasiak, K.L., Maul, D., French, E., Hellyer, P.W. & VandeWoude, S. Species-specific assessment of pain in laboratory animals. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 42, 13–20 (2003).
Wright-Williams, S.L., Courade, J.P., Richardson, C.A., Roughan, J.V. & Flecknell, P.A. Effects of vasectomy surgery and meloxicam treatment on faecal corticosterone levels and behaviour in two strains of laboratory mouse. Pain 130, 108–118 (2007).
Chelini, M.O., Souza, N.L., Cortopassi, S.R., Felippe, E.C. & Oliveira, C.A. Assessment of the physiologic stress response by quantification of fecal corticosteroids. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 45, 8–11 (2006).
Rakowski-Anderson, T. et al. Fecal corticosterone levels in RCAN1 mutant mice. Comp. Med. 62, 87–94 (2012).
Greaves, P. Histopathology of Preclinical Toxicology Studies 3rd edn. Ch. 12 (Elsevier, Waltham, MA, 2007).
Arras, M., Rettich, A., Cinelli, P., Kasermann, H.P. & Burki, K. Assessment of post-laparotomy pain in laboratory mice by telemetric recording of heart rate and heart rate variability. BMC Vet. Res. 3, 16 (2007).
Perissin, L., Facchin, P. & Porro, C.A. Diurnal variations in tonic pain reactions in mice. Life Sci. 67, 1477–1488 (2000).
Miller, A.L., Flecknell, P.A., Leach, M.C. & Roughan, J.V. A comparison of a manual and an automated behavioural analysis method for assessing post-operative pain in mice. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 131, 138–144 (2011).
Leach, M.C. et al. The assessment of post-vasectomy pain in mice using behaviour and the Mouse Grimace Scale. PloS One 7, e35656 (2012).
Clark, J.D., Rager, D.R. & Calpin, J.P. Animal well-being. III. An overview of assessment. Lab. Anim. Sci. 47, 580–585 (1997).
Palme, R. Measuring fecal steroids: guidelines for practical application. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1046, 75–80 (2005).
Chelini, M.O., Souza, N.L., Cortopassi, S.R., Felippe, E.C. & Oliveira, C.A. Assessment of the physiologic stress response by quantification of fecal corticosteroids. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 45, 8–11 (2006).
Moynihan, J., Koota, D., Brenner, G., Cohen, N. & Ader, R. Repeated intraperitoneal injections of saline attenuate the antibody response to a subsequent intraperitoneal injection of antigen. Brain Behav. Immun. 3, 90–96 (1989).
Ryabinin, A.E., Wang, Y.M. & Finn, D.A. Different levels of Fos immunoreactivity after repeated handling and injection stress in two inbred strains of mice. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 63, 143–151 (1999).
von der Ohe, C.G. & Servheen, C. Measuring stress in mammals using fecal glucocorticoids: opportunities and challenges. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 30, 1215–1225 (2002).
Hunt, C. & Hambly, C. Faecal corticosterone concentrations indicate that separately housed male mice are not more stressed than group housed males. Physiol. Behav. 87, 519–526 (2006).
Siswanto, H., Hau, J., Carlsson, H.E., Goldkuhl, R. & Abelson, K.S. Corticosterone concentrations in blood and excretion in faeces after ACTH administration in male Sprague-Dawley rats In Vivo. 22, 435–440 (2008).
Eriksson, E., Royo, F., Lyberg, K., Carlsson, H.E. & Hau, J. Effect of metabolic cage housing on immunoglobulin A and corticosterone excretion in faeces and urine of young male rats. Exp. Physiol. 89, 427–433 (2004).
Volkman, A. & Gowans, J.L. The origin of macrophages from bone marrow in the rat. Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 46, 62–70 (1965).
Gurfein, B.T. et al. The calm mouse: an animal model of stress reduction. Mol. Med. 18, 606–617 (2012).
Tuli, J.S., Smith, J.A. & Morton, D.B. Corticosterone, adrenal and spleen weight in mice after tail bleeding, and its effect on nearby animals. Lab. Anim. 29, 90–95 (1995).
Van Loo, P.L. et al. Long-term effects of husbandry procedures on stress-related parameters in male mice of two strains. Lab. Anim. 38, 169–177 (2004).
Yin, D., Tuthill, D., Mufson, R.A. & Shi, Y. Chronic restraint stress promotes lymphocyte apoptosis by modulating CD95 expression. J. Exp. Med. 191, 1423–1428 (2000).
Acknowledgements
We thank the Biomarkers Core Laboratory at the Yerkes National Primate Research Center, which is supported by a Yerkes National Primate Research Center Base Grant, for providing assay services. We also thank Rebeccah Hunter, Cherie Lawley, Karen Lieber and Kristy Weed of the Division of Animal Resources at Emory University for their technical support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davis, J., Courtney, C., Superak, H. et al. Behavioral, clinical and pathological effects of multiple daily intraperitoneal injections on female mice. Lab Anim 43, 131–139 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.433
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.433
This article is cited by
-
Evaluation of prophylactic efficacy of cinnamaldehyde in murine model against Paradendryphiella arenariae mycotoxin tenuazonic acid-induced oxidative stress and organ toxicity
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Intraperitoneal Route of Drug Administration: Should it Be Used in Experimental Animal Studies?
Pharmaceutical Research (2020)
-
A surgical approach in the treatment of preputial gland abscesses in mice
BMC Veterinary Research (2016)