In response to the questions posed in this scenario, the Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW) provides the following clarifications.

The PHS Policy does not specifically address reporting channels for post-approval monitoring (PAM) personnel. OLAW recommends in previous guidance that direct, clear and straightforward lines of responsibility and corresponding authority allow organizations to respond quickly and effectively1. The Institutional Official (IO) in the scenario should clearly define and assign responsibilities and reporting channels for monitoring animal care and use to safeguard animal welfare2. While not required by the PHS Policy, a PAM program helps ensure the wellbeing of the animals and may also provide opportunities to refine research procedures3. If the study in question was PHS or NSF-supported, the incident qualifies as reportable to OLAW because it was a “failure to adhere to an IACUC-approved protocol”4. As such, the IACUC must be informed of the incident and through the IO promptly provide OLAW with an explanation of the circumstances and the actions taken to address the noncompliance.

Return to Protocol Review