Protocol Review | Published:

Response to Protocol Review Scenario: An IACUC reviews much more than training

Lab Animal volume 45, page 210 (2016) | Download Citation

Subjects

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Research Animal Committee. U.S. Government Principles for the Utilization and Care of Vertebrate Animals Used in Testing, Research, and Training II (Office of Science and Technology Policy, Washington, DC, 1985).

  2. 2.

    Animal Welfare Act regulations. 9 CFR. Chapter I, Subchapter A, Part 2, Subpart C.

  3. 3.

    The Public Health Service Responds to Commonly Asked Questions, ILAR J 33, 68–70 (1991).

  4. 4.

    & Does the goal justify the methods? Harm and benefit in neuroscience research using animals. in Current Topics in Behavioral Neuroscience, Vol. 19 (eds. Lee, G., Illes, J. & Ohl, F.) 47–78 (Springer, Berlin, 2014).

  5. 5.

    In The IACUC Handbook 3rd edn. (eds. Silverman, J., Suckow, M. & Murthy, S.) 215–217 (Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, 2014).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Lyons is the Director of the Animal Welfare Program and IACUC, Means is the Assistant Dean for Research, Young is the Attending Veterinarian and Director of the Animal Resources Program, and Bennett is the Manager of Oversight and Outreach at the Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.

    • David Lyons
    • , Paula Means
    • , Richard Young
    •  & Colleen Bennett

Authors

  1. Search for David Lyons in:

  2. Search for Paula Means in:

  3. Search for Richard Young in:

  4. Search for Colleen Bennett in:

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.1021

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing