Original Article | Published:

Effects of standardized acoustic stimulation in premature infants: a randomized controlled trial

Journal of Perinatology volume 36, pages 486492 (2016) | Download Citation

Abstract

Objective:

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of recorded lullabies and taped maternal voice in premature infants.

Study design:

Sixty-two preterm infants in a stable condition with 30<37 weeks of gestation and <10 days of postnatal age were randomly assigned to hear (A) recorded lullabies or (B) taped maternal voice for 30 min each evening during 14 consecutive days or (C) receive no standardized acoustic stimulation (control group). Heart rate and respiratory rate were recorded daily before, during and after the intervention (A and B) or a comparable period with no intervention (C), whereas activity was measured on days 1, 7 and 14 of the intervention using accelerometers.

Results:

Both interventions led to a significant decrease in heart rate and respiratory rate during and after the stimulation when compared with the control group. The changes were more pronounced in infants with higher gestational ages (P=0.001). Lower activity was measured during the intervention when compared with the control group (P<0.01).

Conclusions:

Standardized acoustic stimulation with recorded lullabies and taped maternal voice led to a decrease in heart rate and respiratory rate, and was associated with lower activity. Whether this indicates a reduced stress reaction needs to be investigated in further studies.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , , , , , et al. The noise in neonatal intensive care units. Arch Pediatr 1996; 311: 1065–1068.

  2. 2.

    , . Noise and light exposures for extremely low birth weight newborns during their stay in the neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatrics 2009; 1232: 540–546.

  3. 3.

    . Environmental impact of the NICU on developmental outcomes. J Pediatr Nurs 1998; 135: 279–289.

  4. 4.

    , . Responses of premature infants to routine nursing interventions and noise in the NICU. Nurs Res 1995; 443: 179–185.

  5. 5.

    . A risk of sensory deprivation in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Pediatr 2014; 1646: 1265–1267.

  6. 6.

    , , , . Importance of parent talk on the development of preterm infant vocalizations. Pediatrics 2011; 1285: 910–916.

  7. 7.

    , , , , . Linking prenatal experience to the emerging musical mind. Front Syst Neurosci 2013; 7: 48.

  8. 8.

    , , , , , et al. Alterations in brain structure and neurodevelopmental outcome in preterm infants hospitalized in different neonatal intensive care unit environments. J Pediatr 2014; 1641: 52–60.e2.

  9. 9.

    Cassidy. Presentation of aural stimuli to newborns and premature infants: an audiological perspective. J Music Ther 1999; 352: 70–87.

  10. 10.

    , , , , . Effect of lullaby and classical music on physiologic stability of hospitalized preterm infants: a randomized trial. J Neonatal Perinatal Med 2013; 64: 295–301.

  11. 11.

    , , , , . A pacifier-activated music player with mother’s voice improves oral feeding in preterm infants. Pediatrics 2014; 1333: 462–468.

  12. 12.

    , , , , . The effects of music therapy on vital signs, feeding, and sleep in premature infants. Pediatrics 2013; 1315: 902–918.

  13. 13.

    , , , , , et al. Live music is beneficial to preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit environment. Birth 2006; 332: 131–136.

  14. 14.

    , . Live harp music reduces activity and increases weight gain in stable premature infants. J Altern Complement Med 2008; 1410: 1185–1186.

  15. 15.

    . The relationship between maternal and musical auditory stimulation and the developmental behavior of premature infants. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser 1979; 157: 81–98.

  16. 16.

    , , , , . Effects of music on physiological and behavioral responses of premature infants: a randomized controlled trial. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2013; 193: 128–132.

  17. 17.

    . Sound and the developing infant in the NICU: conclusions and recommendations for care. J Perinatol 2000; 208(Pt 2): 88–93.

  18. 18.

    , . Therapeutic effects of music and mother’s voice on premature infants. Pediatr Nurs 1995; 216: 509–512.

  19. 19.

    , , , , , et al. Enhanced kangaroo mother care for heel lance in preterm neonates: a crossover trial. J Perinatol 2009; 291: 51–56.

  20. 20.

    . Exposure to maternal voice in preterm infants: a review. Adv Neonatal Care 2010; 101: 13–18.

  21. 21.

    , , , , . Exposure to biological maternal sounds improves cardiorespiratory regulation in extremely preterm infants. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 259: 1591–1594.

  22. 22.

    , , . Developmental care of the newborn. Online J Clin Innovat 2000; 157: 1–77.

  23. 23.

    . The effect of music and multimodal stimulation on responses of premature infants in neonatal intensive care. Pediatr Nurs 1998; 246: 532–538.

  24. 24.

    , , , . Bach music in preterm infants: no ‘Mozart effect’ on resting energy expenditure. J Perinatol 2014; 342: 153–155.

  25. 25.

    , . Hearing and behavioral responses to sound in full-term newborns. J Perinatol 2000; Pt 2: 68–76.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the parents for allowing us to include their preterm infants. We also thank Marc Hirdes and the nurses for their help, and KIM e.V., Marburg, Germany, for financial support.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Children’s Hospital, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany

    • L Wirth
    • , F Dorn
    • , M Wege
    • , M Zemlin
    •  & R F Maier
  2. Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany

    • B Lemmer
    •  & S Gorbey
  3. Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany

    • N Timmesfeld

Authors

  1. Search for L Wirth in:

  2. Search for F Dorn in:

  3. Search for M Wege in:

  4. Search for M Zemlin in:

  5. Search for B Lemmer in:

  6. Search for S Gorbey in:

  7. Search for N Timmesfeld in:

  8. Search for R F Maier in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L Wirth.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Revised

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2016.1