Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • State of the Art
  • Published:


Clarifying nipple confusion



Nipple confusion, an infant’s difficulty with or preference for one feeding mechanism over another after exposure to artificial nipple(s), has been widely debated. This is in part due to conflicting statements, one by the American Academy of Pediatrics in 2005 suggesting that infants should be given a pacifier to protect against Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, and the other by the World Health Organization in 2009 stating that breastfeeding infants should never be given artificial nipples. Despite the limited and inconsistent evidence, nipple confusion is widely believed by practitioners. Therefore, there is a unique opportunity to examine the evidence surrounding nipple confusion by assessing the research that supports/refutes that bottle feeding/pacifier use impedes breastfeeding efficacy/success/duration. This review examined 14 articles supporting and refuting nipple confusion. These articles were reviewed using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Rating Scale. Based on our review, we have found emerging evidence to suggest the presence of nipple confusion only as it relates to bottle usage and found very little evidence to support nipple confusion with regards to pacifier use. The primary difficulty in conclusively studying nipple confusion is establishing causality, namely determining whether bottles’/pacifiers’ nipples are causing infants to refuse the breast or whether they are simply markers of other maternal/infant characteristics. Future research should focus on prospectively examining the causality of nipple confusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1


  1. Neifert M, Lawrence R, Seacat J . Nipple confusion: toward a formal definition. J Pediatr 1995; 126 (6): 125–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dowling D, Thanattherakul W . Nipple confusion, alternative feeding methods, and breast-feeding supplementation: state of the science. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev 2001; 1 (4): 217–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. UNICEF/WHO Section 1 Background and Implementation. UNICEF/WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.

  4. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Sudden Infant Death S. The changing concept of sudden infant death syndrome: diagnostic coding shifts, controversies regarding the sleeping environment, and new variables to consider in reducing risk Pediatrics 2005; 116 (5): 1245–1255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Al-Sahab B, Feldman M, Macpherson A, Ohlsson A, Tamim H . Which method of breastfeeding supplementation is best? The beliefs and practices of paediatricians and nurses. Paediatr Child Health 2010; 15 (7): 427–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cloherty M, Alexander J, Holloway I, Galvin K, Inch S . The cup-versus-bottle debate: a theme from an ethnographic study of the supplementation of breastfed infants in hospital in the United Kingdom. J Hum Lact 2005; 21: 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Newhouse R, Dearholt S, Poe S, Pugh L, White K . The Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Rating Scale. The Johns Hopkins Hospital: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kverno KS, Black BS, Nolan MT, Rabins PV . Research on treating neuropsychiatric symptoms of advanced dementia with non-pharmacological strategies, 1998–2008: a systematic literature review. Int Psychogeriatr 2009; 21 (5): 825–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grant MS, Jenkins LS . Communication education for pre-licensure nursing students: literature review 2002–2013. Nurse Educ Today 2014; 13: 1375–1381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moral A, Bolibar I, Martinez-Barba C, Moral A, Rios J, Sebastia G et al. Mechanics of sucking: comparison between bottle feeding and breastfeeding. BMC Pediatr 2010; 10: 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schubiger G, Schwarz U, Tonz O . UNICEF/WHO baby-friendly hospital initiative: does the use of bottles and pacifiers in the neonatal nursery prevent successful breastfeeding? Eur J Pediatr 1997; 156: 874–877.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hla MM, Novotny R, Kieffer EC, Mor J, Thiele M . Early weaning among Japanese women in Hawaii. J Biosoc Sci 2003; 35 (2): 227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moimaz SA, Zina LG, Saliba NA, Saliba O . Association between breast-feeding practices and sucking habits: a cross-sectional study of children in their first year of life. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2008; 26: 102–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Righard L . Are breastfeeding problems related to incorrect breastfeeding technique and the use of pacifiers and bottles? Birth 1998; 25 (1): 40–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kliethermes PA, Cross ML, Lanese MG, Johnson KM, Simon SD . Transitioning preterm infants with nasogastric tube supplementation: increased likelihood of breastfeeding. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1998; 28 (3): 264–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fisher C, Inch S . Nipple confusion—who is confused? J Pediatr 1996; 129 (1): 174–179.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Barros FC, Tonioli Filho S, Semer TC, Tomasi E, Victoria CG, Weiderpass E . Use of pacifiers is associated with decreased breast-feeding duration. Pediatrics 1995; 95 (4): 497.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Victora CG, Behague DP, Barros FC, Olinto MTA, Weiderpass E . Pacifier use and short breastfeeding duration: cause, consequence, or coincidence? Pediatrics 1997; 99 (3): 445–453.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. do Nascimento MBR, Reis MAM, Franco SC, Issler H, Ferraro AA, Grisi SJFE . Exclusive breastfeeding in southern brazil: prevalence and associated factors. Breastfeed Med 2010; 5 (2): 79–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Howard CR, Howard FM, Lanphear B, Eberly S, deBlieck EA, Oakes D et al. Randomized clinical trial of pacifier use and bottle-feeding or cupfeeding and their effect on breastfeeding. Pediatrics 2003; 111 (3): 511–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kair LR, Kenron D, Etheredge K, Jaffe AC, Phillipi CA . Pacifier restriction and exclusive breastfeeding. Pediatrics 2013; 131 (4): e1101–e1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kramer MS, Barr RG, Dagenais S, Yang H, Jones P, Ciofani L et al. Pacifier use, early weaning, and cry/fuss behavior: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc 2001; 286 (3): 322–326.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Collins CT, Ryan P, Crowther CA, McPhee AJ, Paterson S, Hiller JE . Effect of bottles, cups, and dummies on breast feeding in preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2004; 329 (7459): 193–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zimmerman E, Barlow SM . Pacifier stiffness alters the dynamics of the suck central pattern generator. J Neonatal Nurs 2008; 14 (3): 79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to E Zimmerman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zimmerman, E., Thompson, K. Clarifying nipple confusion. J Perinatol 35, 895–899 (2015).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Quick links