Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perinatal/Neonatal Case Presentation
  • Published:

Perinatal/Neonatal Case Presentation

Medical and ethical challenges in the case of a prenatally undiagnosed massive congenital brain tumor

Abstract

Fetal and neonatal brain tumors are rare. Prenatal ultrasound aids early tumor detection. Nonetheless, we encountered a preterm neonate born at 32 weeks gestation with a massive supratentorial glioma, which was undetected on ultrasound at 19-6/7 weeks gestation. The patient presented at birth with unanticipated massive macrocephaly. Resuscitation and stabilization were difficult, but the medical team felt that futility of care was not established and opted to transfer the baby to an academic center for further imaging and specialist consultations. Diagnosis of an extensive, inoperable tumor was confirmed and support withdrawn. Postmortem histologic examination and immunohistochemical stains identified the majority of tumor cells as glial in origin. This case report illustrates well how a severe and potentially fatal anomaly, which remained undetected prenatally, presented the medical team and family with multiple medical, ethical and emotional challenges at birth; decisions regarding futility of care in the neonatal transport setting are difficult.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Isaacs H Jr . I. Perinatal brain tumors: a review of 250 cases. Pediatr Neurol 2002; 27: 249–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Isaacs H Jr . II. Perinatal brain tumors: a review of 250 cases. Pediatr Neurol 2002; 27: 333–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kamil D, Tepelmann J, Berg C, Heep A, Axt-Fliedner R, Gembruch U et al. Spectrum and outcome of prenatally diagnosed fetal tumors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 296–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nejat F, Kazmi SS, Ardakani SB . Congenital brain tumors in a series of seven patients. Pediatr Neurosurg 2008; 44: 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hwang SW, Su JM, Jea A . Diagnosis and management of brain and spinal cord tumors in the neonate. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 17: 202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cavalheiro S, Moron AF, Hisaba W, Dastoli P, Silva NS . Fetal brain tumors. Child's Nerv Syst 2003; 19: 529–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Manoranjan B, Provias JP . Congenital brain tumors: diagnostic pitfalls and therapeutic interventions. J Child Neurol 2011; 26: 599–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shamji MF, Vassilyadi M, Lam CH, Montes JL, Farmer JP . Congenital tumors of the central nervous system: the MCH experience. Pediatr Neurosurg 2009; 45: 368–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schlembach D, Bornemann A, Rupprecht T, Beinder E . Fetal intracranial tumors detected by ultrasound: a report of two cases and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 14: 407–418.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Alvarez M, Chitkara U, Lynch L, Mehalek KE, Heller D, Berkowitz RL . Prenatal diagnosis of fetal brain tumors. Fetal Ther 1987; 2: 203–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Saada J, Enza-Razavi F, Delahaye S, Martinovic J, Macaleese J, Benachi A . Early second-trimester diagnosis of intracranial teratoma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 109–111.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilkinson D, de Crespigny L, Xafis V . Ethical language and decision-making for prenatally diagnosed lethal malformations. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2014; 19: 306–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilkinson DJ . Futile treatment: the ethicist's perspective. Med J Aust 2013; 198: 223–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Feltman D, Stokes T, Kett J, Lantos JD . Is treatment futile for an extremely premature infant with giant omphalocele? Pediatrics 2014; 133: 123–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fine RL, Whitfield JM, Carr BL, Mayo TW . Medical futility in the neonatal intensive care unit: hope for a resolution. Pediatrics 2005; 116: 1219–1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dulkerian SJ, Douglas WP, Taylor RM . Redirecting treatment during neonatal transport. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2011; 25: 111–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Meadow W, Cohen-Cutler S, Spelke B, Kim A, Plesac M, Weis K et al. The prediction and cost of futility in the NICU. Acta Paediatr 2012; 101: 397–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the staff of the referring hospital, transport team and receiving hospital (who are not further named to deidentify the patient). We thank Dr Judith Rossiter for review of the deidentified prenatal US findings.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C Theda.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have not received any support for the work in the form of grants and/or equipment or drugs. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Olischar, M., Stavroudis, T., Karp, J. et al. Medical and ethical challenges in the case of a prenatally undiagnosed massive congenital brain tumor. J Perinatol 35, 773–775 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2015.80

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2015.80

Search

Quick links