Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Mask ventilation with two different face masks in the delivery room for preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Background:

If an infant fails to initiate spontaneous breathing after birth, international guidelines recommend a positive pressure ventilation (PPV). However, PPV by face mask is frequently inadequate because of leak between the face and mask. Despite a variety of available face masks, none have been prospectively compared in a randomized fashion. We aimed to evaluate and compare leak between two commercially available round face masks (Fisher & Paykel (F&P) and Laerdal) in preterm infants <33 weeks gestational age in the delivery room.

Methods:

Infants born at the Royal Alexandra Hospital from April to September 2013 at <33 weeks gestational age who received mask PPV in the delivery room routinely had a flow sensor placed between the mask and T-piece resuscitator. Infants were randomly assigned to receive PPV with either a F&P or Laerdal face mask. All resuscitators were trained in the use of both face masks. We compared mask leak, airway pressures, tidal volume and ventilation rate between the two groups.

Results:

Fifty-six preterm infants (n=28 in each group) were enrolled; mean±s.d. gestational age 28±3 weeks; birth weight 1210±448 g; and 30 (52%) were male. Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min were 5±3 and 7±2, respectively. Infants randomized to the F&P face mask and Laerdal face mask had similar mask leak (30 (25–38) versus 35 (24–46)%, median (interquartile range), respectively, P=0.40) and tidal volume (7.1 (4.9–8.9) versus 6.6 (5.2–8.9) ml kg−1, P=0.69) during PPV. There were no significant differences in ventilation rate, inflation time or airway pressures between groups.

Conclusion:

The use of either face mask during PPV in the delivery room yields similar mask leak in preterm infants <33 weeks gestational age.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perlman JM, Wyllie J, Kattwinkel J, Atkins DL, Chameides L, Goldsmith JP et al. Neonatal resuscitation: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Pediatrics 2010; 126 (5): e1319–e1344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kattwinkel J, Niermeyer S, Nadkarni V, Tibballs J, Phillips B, Zideman D et al. An advisory statement from the Pediatric Working Group of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Pediatrics 1999; 103 (4): e56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Palme C, Nystrom B, Tunell R . An evaluation of the efficiency of face masks in the resuscitation of newborn infants. Lancet 1985; 1 (8422): 207–210.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McCarthy LK, Twomey AR, Molloy EJ, Murphy JF, O'Donnell CP . A randomized trial of nasal prong or face mask for respiratory support for preterm newborns. Pediatrics 2013; 132 (2): e389–e395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. O'Donnell CP, Davis PG, Lau R, Dargaville PA, Doyle LW, Morley CJ . Neonatal resuscitation 2: an evaluation of manual ventilation devices and face masks. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005; 90 (5): F392–F396.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schilleman K, Witlox RS, Lopriore E, Morley CJ, Walther FJ, te Pas AB . Leak and obstruction with mask ventilation during simulated neonatal resuscitation. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2010; 95 (6): F398–F402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tracy M, Downe L, Holberton J . How safe is intermittent positive pressure ventilation in preterm babies ventilated from delivery to newborn intensive care unit? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004; 89 (1): F84–F87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wood FE, Morley CJ, Dawson JA, Kamlin CO, Owen LS, Donath S et al. Assessing the effectiveness of two round neonatal resuscitation masks: study 1. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2008; 93 (3): F235–F237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wood FE, Morley CJ, Dawson JA, Kamlin CO, Owen LS, Donath S et al. Improved techniques reduce face mask leak during simulated neonatal resuscitation: study 2. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2008; 93 (3): F230–F234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dawson JA, Kamlin CO, Vento M, Wong C, Cole TJ, Donath SM et al. Defining the reference range for oxygen saturation for infants after birth. Pediatrics 2010; 125 (6): e1340–e1347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kattwinkel J, Perlman JM, Aziz K, Colby C, Fairchild K, Gallagher J et al. Part 15: neonatal resuscitation: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010; 122 (18 Suppl 3): S909–S919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. O'Donnell CP, Kamlin CO, Davis PG, Morley CJ . Neonatal resuscitation 1: a model to measure inspired and expired tidal volumes and assess leakage at the face mask. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005; 90 (5): F388–F391.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wood FE, Morley CJ . Face mask ventilation-the dos and don'ts. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2013; 18 (6): 344–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Deindl P, O'Reilly M, Zoller K, Berger A, Pollak A, Schwindt J et al. Influence of mask type and mask position on the effectiveness of bag-mask ventilation in a neonatal manikin. Eur J Pediatr 2014; 173 (1): 75–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schmölzer GM, Dawson JA, Kamlin CO, O'Donnell CP, Morley CJ, Davis PG . Airway obstruction and gas leak during mask ventilation of preterm infants in the delivery room. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2011; 96 (4): F254–F257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schmölzer GM, Kamlin OC, O'Donnell CP, Dawson JA, Morley CJ, Davis PG . Assessment of tidal volume and gas leak during mask ventilation of preterm infants in the delivery room. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2010; 95 (6) p F393–F397.Abstract No. 2938.531..

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. O'Shea JE, Thio M, Owen LS, Dawson JA, Davis PG . Facial Measurements in Preterm Infants: Appropriate Mask Fit for Respiratory Support. Annual Meeting of Pediatric Academic Societies 2014 Abstract No. 2938.531.

  18. Chua C, Schmölzer GM, Davis PG . Airway manoeuvres to achieve upper airway patency during mask ventilation in newborn infants - an historical perspective. Resuscitation 2012; 83 (4): 411–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilson EV, O'Shea JE, Thio M, Dawson JA, Boland R, Davis PG . A comparison of different mask holds for positive pressure ventilation in a neonatal manikin. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2014; 99 (2): F169–F171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Finer NN, Rich W, Wang C, Leone T . Airway obstruction during mask ventilation of very low birth weight infants during neonatal resuscitation. Pediatrics 2009; 123 (3): 865–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Binder C, Schmölzer GM, O'Reilly M, Schwaberger B, Urlesberger B, Pichler G . Human or monitor feedback to improve mask ventilation during simulated neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2014; 99 (2): F120–F123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schilleman K, van der Pot CJ, Hooper SB, Lopriore E, Walther FJ, te Pas AB . Evaluating manual inflations and breathing during mask ventilation in preterm infants at birth. J Pediatr 2013; 162 (3): 457–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the parents and infants agreeing to be part of the study and the Resuscitation-Stabilization-Triage team at the Royal Alexandra Hospital for their assistance and support of the study. GMS is a recipient of the Heart and Stroke Foundation/University of Alberta Professorship of Neonatal Resuscitation. F&P (Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand) provided the Fisher & Paykel face masks for the study. No study sponsor or company that manufactures markets or sells any equipment used in the study had involvement in study design, data collection or interpretation or the decision to present or publish the results.

Author Contributions

Conception and design: GMS, KA, PYC. Collection and assembly of data: DC, QM, GMS, KA, GP, MOR, PYC. Analysis and interpretation of the data: DC, QM, GMS, KA, GP, MOR, PYC. Drafting of the article: DC, QM, GMS, KA, GP, MOR, PYC. Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: DC, QM, GMS, KA, GP, MOR, PYC. Final approval of the article: DC, QM, GMS, KA, GP, MOR, PYC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G M Schmölzer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheung, D., Mian, Q., Cheung, PY. et al. Mask ventilation with two different face masks in the delivery room for preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial. J Perinatol 35, 464–468 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2015.8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2015.8

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links