Abstract
Enumerations of people were carried out long before the birth of Jesus. Data related to births were recorded in church registers in England as early as the 1500s. However, not until the 1902 Act of Congress was the Bureau of Census established as a permanent agency to develop birth registration areas and a standard registration system. Although all states had birth records by 1919, the use of the standardized version was not uniformly adopted until the 1930's. In the 1989 US Standard Birth Certificate revision, the format was finally uniformly adopted to include checkboxes to improve data quality and completeness. The evolution of the 12 federal birth certificate revisions is reflected in the growth of the number of items from 33 in 1900 to more than 60 items in the 2003 birth certificate. As birth registration has moved from paper to electronic, the birth certificate's potential utility has broadened, yet issues with updating the electronic format and maintaining quality data continue to evolve. Understanding the birth certificate within its historical context allows for better insight as to how it has been and will continue to be used as an important public-health document shaping medical and public policies.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Concordance of neonatal critical condition data between secondary databases:Â Florida and Texas birth certificate Linkage with medicaid analytic extract
BMC Medical Research Methodology Open Access 20 February 2023
-
Both parents matter: a national-scale analysis of parental race/ethnicity, disparities in prenatal PM2.5 exposures and related impacts on birth outcomes
Environmental Health Open Access 06 May 2022
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Hetzel AM . History and organization of the vital statistics system. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD, 1997.
Brown E . Value of the Vital Statistics Data on birth and death certificates in county health work. Am J Public Health 1938; 28: 1398–1402.
US Census Bureau Overview of History. Available at: http://www.census.gov/history/www/through_the_decades/overview/. Accessed on 1 December 2011.
CDC/National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System, Vital Certificate Revisions, 2003 Revisions of the US Standard Certificates of Live Birth and Death and the Fetal Death Report. Available at: www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vital_certificate_revisions.htm. Accessed on 1 December 2011.
Schoendorf K, Branum A . The use of United States Vital Statistics in perinatal and obstetric research. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 911–915.
Zemach R . What the vital statistics system can and cannot do. Am J Public Health 1984; 74: 756–758.
Shapiro S, Schachter J . Birth registration completeness United States, 1950. Public Health Rep 1952; 67: 513–524.
Northam S, Polancich S, Restrepo E . Birth certificate methods in five hospitals. Public Health Nurs 2003; 20: 318–327.
Plecker WA . A standard certificate of birth. Am J Public Health 1915; 5: 1044–1047.
Lilienfeld AM, Parkhurst E, Patton R, Schlesinger ER . Accuracy of supplemental medical information on birth certificates. Public Health Rep 1951; 66: 191–204.
Philip AG . The evolution of neonatology. Pediatr Res 2005; 58: 799–813.
Halliday HL . Surfactants: past, present and future. J Perinatol 2008; 28: S47–S56.
Frost F, Starzyk P, George S, McLaughlin J . Birth complication reporting: the effect of birth certificate design. Am J Public Health 1984; 74: 505–506.
Freedman MA, Gay G, Brockert J, Potrzebowski P, Rothwell C . The 1989 revisions of the US standard certificate of live birth and death and the US standard report of fetal death. Am J Public Health 1988; 78: 168–172.
Joseph KS, Huang L, Liu S, Ananth CV, Allen AC, Sauve R et al. Reconciling the high rates of preterm and postterm birth in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 813–822.
Starr P, Starr S . Reinventing Vital Statistics. The impact of changes in information technology, welfare policy, and health care. Public Health Rep 1995; 110: 534–544.
Kirby R, Salihu H . Back to the future? A critical commentary on the 2003 US National Standard Certificate of live birth. Birth 2006; 33: 238–244.
User Guide to the 2008 Natality Public Use File. Available at: ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Dataset_Documentation/DVS/natality/UserGuide2008.pdf. Accessed on 1 December 2011.
Rothwell CJ . Reengineering vital registration and statistics systems for the United States. Prev Chronic Dis (serial online) (2004 Oct 11). Available at: www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2004/oct/04_0074.htm. Accessed on 1 December 2011.
National Association for Public Health Statistics and Information Systems. Available at: www.naphsis.org/index.asp?bid=980. Accessed 1 December 2011.
Dobie SA, Baldwin LM, Rosenblatt RA, Fordyce MA, Andrilla CH, Hart LG . How well do birth certificates describe the pregnancies they report? The Washington State experience with low-risk pregnancies. Matern Child Health J 1998; 2: 145–154.
Roohan PJ, Josberger RE, Acar J, Dabir P, Feder HM, Gagliano PJ . Validation of birth certificate data in New York State. J Community Health 2003; 28: 335–346.
Gould JB, Chavez G, Marks AR, Liu H . Incomplete birth certificates: a risk marker for infant mortality. Am J Public Health 2002; 92: 79–81.
Reiling J (Asst ed). The Registration of Births. JAMA 1908; 50: 1612. From JAMA 100 Years Ago. JAMA 2008; 299: 2220.
Woolbright LA, Harshbarger DS . The revised standard certificate of live birth: analysis of medical risk factor data from birth certificates in Alabama, 1988-92. Public Health Rep 1995; 110: 59–63.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the assistance of Anand Lakhkar, MBBS and Agata Pluzyczka. We also thank Charles J Rothwell, MS, MBA, Joshua C Brumberg, PhD and Stephan F Brumberg, PhD for their helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brumberg, H., Dozor, D. & Golombek, S. History of the birth certificate: from inception to the future of electronic data. J Perinatol 32, 407–411 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2012.3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2012.3
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Concordance of neonatal critical condition data between secondary databases:Â Florida and Texas birth certificate Linkage with medicaid analytic extract
BMC Medical Research Methodology (2023)
-
Both parents matter: a national-scale analysis of parental race/ethnicity, disparities in prenatal PM2.5 exposures and related impacts on birth outcomes
Environmental Health (2022)
-
How Well Do Birth Records Serve Maternal and Child Health Programs? Birth Registration System Evaluation, New York City, 2008–2011
Maternal and Child Health Journal (2015)