Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

The impact of certificate of need programs on neonatal intensive care units

Abstract

Objective:

To determine the impact of state certificate of need programs (CON) on the number of hospitals with neonatal intensive care units (NICU) and the number of NICU beds.

Study Design:

The presence of a CON program was verified from each state's department of health. Multivariable regression models determined the association between the absence of a CON program and each outcome after controlling for socioeconomic and demographic differences between states.

Result:

A total of 30 states had CON programs that oversaw NICUs in 2008. Absence of such programs was associated with more hospitals with a NICU (Rate Ratio (RR) 2.06, 95% CI 1.74 to 2.45) and NICU beds (RR 1.96, 95% CI 1.89 to 2.03) compared with states with CON legislation, and increased all-infant mortality rates in states with a large metropolitan area.

Conclusion:

There has been an erosion of CON programs that oversee NICUs. CON programs are associated with more efficient delivery of neonatal care.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Phibbs CS, Bronstein JM, Buxton E, Phibbs RH . The effects of patient volume and level of care at the hospital of birth on neonatal mortality. JAMA 1996; 276: 1054–1059.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Phibbs CS, Baker LC, Caughey AB, Danielsen B, Schmitt SK, Phibbs RH . Level and volume of neonatal intensive care and mortality in very-low-birth-weight infants. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 2165–2175.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cifuentes J, Bronstein J, Phibbs CS, Phibbs RH, Schmitt SK, Carlo WA . Mortality in low birth weight infants according to level of neonatal care at hospital of birth. Pediatrics 2002; 109: 745–751.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lasswell SM, Barfield WD, Rochat RW, Blackmon L . Perinatal regionalization for very low-birth-weight and very preterm infants: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2010; 304: 992–1000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Meadow W, Kim M, Mendez D, Bell A, Gray C, Corpuz M et al. Which nurseries currently care for ventilated neonates in Illinois and Wisconsin? Implications for the next generation of perinatal regionalization. Am J Perinatol 2002; 19: 197–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bode MM, O’Shea TM, Metzguer KR, Stiles AD . Perinatal regionalization and neonatal mortality in North Carolina, 1968 to 1994. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184: 1302–1307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Powell SL, Holt VL, Hickok DE, Easterling T, Connell FA . Recent changes in delivery site of low-birth-weight infants in Washington: Impact on birth weight-specific mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 1585–1592.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gould JB, Marks AR, Chavez G . Expansion of community-based perinatal care in California. J Perinatol 2002; 22: 630–640.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lorch SA, Myers S, Carr B . The regionalization of pediatric health care: A state of the art review. Pediatrics 2010; 126: 1182–1190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hellinger FJ . The effect of certificate-of-need laws on hospital beds and healthcare expenditures: An empirical analysis. Am J Manag Care 2009; 15: 737–744.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ho V . Certificate of need, volume, and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty outcomes. Am Heart J 2004; 147: 442–448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ho V, Ross JS, Nallamothu BK, Krumholz HM . Cardiac Certificate of Need regulations and the availability and use of revascularization services. Am Heart J 2007; 154: 767–775.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ho V, Ku-Goto MH, Jollis JG . Certificate of Need (CON) for cardiac care: controversy over the contributions of CON. Health Serv Res 2009; 44: 483–500.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Conover CJ, Sloan FA . Does removing certificate-of-need regulations lead to a surge in health care spending? J Health Polit Policy Law 1998; 23: 455–481.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Robinson JL, Nash DB, Moxey E, O’Connor JP . Certificate of need and the quality of cardiac surgery. Am J Med Qual 2001; 16: 155–160.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shortell SM, Hughes EF . The effects of regulation, competition, and ownership on mortality rates among hospital inpatients. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 1100–1107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Garrison Jr LP . Assessment of the effectiveness of supply-side cost-containment measures. Health Care Financ Rev Annu Suppl 1991; 13–20.

  18. National Conference of State Legislatures (homepage on the Internet). The National Directory. c2010 Available from: http://www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=14373http://www.ahpanet.org/.

  19. Blackmon LR, Barfield WD, Stark AR . Hospital neonatal services in the United States: Variation in definitions, criteria, and regulatory status, 2008. J Perinatol 2009; 29: 788–794.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. American Academy of Pediatrics (homepage on the Internet). Available from: <http://www.aap.org/securemoc/neoperi/content/NICU.pdf>.

  21. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Levels of neonatal care. Pediatrics 2004; 114: 1341–1347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (homepage on the Internet). National Center for Health Statistics. Health Data Interactive. Last updated 2010 Feb 24. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/hdi.htm.

  23. Baker LC, Phibbs CS . Managed care, technology adoption, and health care: The adoption of neonatal intensive care. Rand J Econ 2002; 33: 524–548.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Salkever DS, Bice TW . The impact of certificate-of-need controls on hospital investment. Milbank Q 1976; 54; 185–214.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cromwell J . Impact of State hospital rate setting on capital formation. Health Care Financ Rev 1987; 8: 69–82.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Vaughan-Sarrazin MS, Hannan EL, Gormley CJ, Rosenthal GE . Mortality in Medicare beneficiaries following coronary artery bypass graft surgery in states with and without certificate of need regulation. JAMA 2002; 288: 1859–1866.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Massachusetts Department of Public Health. 105CMR: Department of Public Health. Last updated 2010 April 2. Available from: http://www.mass.gov/eohhs/docs/dph/regs/105cmr130.pdf.

  28. Phibbs CS, Mark DH, Luft HS, Peltzman-Rennie DJ, Garnick DW, Lichtenberg E et al. Choice of hospital for delivery: A comparison of high-risk and low-risk women. Health Serv Res 1993; 28: 201–222.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Finlayson SR, Birkmeyer JD, Tosteson AN, Nease Jr RF . Patient preferences for location of care: Implications for regionalization. Med Care 1999; 37: 204–209.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S A Lorch.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lorch, S., Maheshwari, P. & Even-Shoshan, O. The impact of certificate of need programs on neonatal intensive care units. J Perinatol 32, 39–44 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2011.47

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2011.47

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links