Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

The single-patient room in the NICU: maternal and family effects

Abstract

Objective:

To explore differences in maternal factors, including visitation and holding, among premature infants cared for in single-patient rooms (SPR) compared with open-bay in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

Study Design:

A total of 81 premature infants were assigned to a bed space in either the open-bay area or in a SPR upon NICU admission, based on bed space and staffing availability in each area. Parent visitation and holding were tracked through term equivalent, and parents completed a comprehensive questionnaire at discharge to describe maternal health. Additional maternal and medical factors were collected from the medical record. Differences in outcome variables were investigated using linear regression.

Result:

No significant differences in gestational age at birth, initial medical severity, hours of intubation or other factors that could affect the outcome were observed across room type. Significantly more hours of visitation were observed in the first 2 weeks of life (P=0.02) and in weeks 3 and 4 (P=0.02) among infants in the SPR. More NICU stress was reported by mothers in the SPR after controlling for social support (P=0.04).

Conclusion:

Increased parent visitation is an important benefit of the SPR, however, mothers with infants in the SPR reported more stress.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miles MS, Funk SG, Carlson J . Parental Stressor Scale: neonatal intensive care unit. Nurs Res 1993; 42 (3): 148–152.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jamsa K., Jamsa T. . Technology in neonatal intensive care–a study on parents’ experiences. Technol Health Care 1998; 6 (4): 225–230.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Howland LC, Pickler RH, McCain NL, Glaser D, Lewis M . Exploring biobehavioral outcomes in mothers of preterm infants. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2011; 36 (2): 91–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Affleck G, Tennen H . The effect of newborn intensive care on parents’ psychological well-being. Child Health Care 1991; 20: 6–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ortenstrand A, Westrup B, Broström EB, Sarman I, Akerström S, Brune T et al. The Stockholm Neonatal Family Centered Care Study: effects on length of stay and infant morbidity. Pediatrics 2010; 125 (2): e278–e85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stevens DC, Helseth CC, Khan MA, Munson DP, Smith TJ . Neonatal intensive care nursery staff perceive enhanced workplace quality with the single-family room design. J Perinatol 2010; 30 (5): 352–358.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Domanico R, Davis DK, Coleman F, Davis BO Jr . Documenting the NICU design dilemma: parent and staff perceptions of open ward versus single family room units. J Perinatol 2010; 30 (5): 343–351.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Domanico R, Davis DK, Coleman F, Davis BO Jr . Documenting the NICU design dilemma: comparative patient progress in open ward and single family room units. J Perinatol 2011; 31 (4): 281–288.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Erdeve O, Arsan S, Canpolat FE, Ertem IO, Karagol BS, Atasay B et al. Does individual room implemented family-centered care contribute to mother-infant interaction in preterm deliveries necessitating neonatal intensive care unit hospitalization? Am J Perinatol 2009; 26 (2): 159–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Newnham CA, Inder TE, Milgrom J . Measuring preterm cumulative stressors within the NICU: The Neontal Infant Stressor Scale. Early Human Dev 2009; 85 (9): 549–555.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Speilberger C . State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults. Mind Garden: Menlo Park, 2005–2008.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R . Detection of postnatal depression:development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry 1987; 150: 782–786.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Endler N, Parker JD . Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS): Manual. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Miles MS, Funk SG, Carlson J . Parental Stressor Scale: neonatal intensive care unit. Nurs Res 1993; 42 (3): 148–152.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Abidin R . Parenting Stress Index, Third Edition. Charlottesville: Pediatric Psychology Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sarason IG, Levine HM, Basham RB, Sarason BR . Assessing social support: The Social Support Questionnaire. J Pers Soc Psychol 1983; 44 (1): 127–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Poehlmann J, Schwichtenberg AJ, Bolt D, Dilworth-Bart J . Predictors of depressive symptom trajectories in mothers of preterm or low birth weight infants. J Fam Psychol 2009; 23 (5): 690–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Beck CT . Predictors of postpartum depression: an update. Nurs Res 2001; 50 (5): 275–285.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Brown N, Doyle LW, Bear MJ, Inder TE . Alterations in neurobehavior at term reflect differing perinatal exposures in very preterm infants. Pediatrics 2006; 118 (6): 2461–2471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Franck L, Spencer C . Parent visiting and participation in infant caregiving activities in a neonatal unit. Birth 2003; 30 (1): 31–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by the National Institute of Health (ROI HD 057098) and the Doris Duke Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R G Pineda.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pineda, R., Stransky, K., Rogers, C. et al. The single-patient room in the NICU: maternal and family effects. J Perinatol 32, 545–551 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2011.144

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2011.144

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links