Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A randomized trial of the Vein Viewer versus standard technique for placement of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in neonates

Journal of Perinatology volume 32, pages 498–501 (2012)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Objective:

Peripherally inserted central catheters are important but can be difficult to place in neonates. Therefore, we compared a near-infrared device, the Vein Viewer, to determine if its use would increase successful line placement, with standard techniques.

Study Design:

Randomized controlled trial in preterm and term neonates in a level 3 Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Result:

In all, 115 subjects were enrolled with 59 randomized to the Vein Viewer group and 56 to the control group. Overall, use of the Vein Viewer showed a trend to more successful placement 86 versus 75%; unadjusted odds ratio 2.33 (0.90, 6.04; P=0.08). Infants randomized to the Vein Viewer were more mature (30±2 weeks gestational age (GA) versus 28±2 weeks GA; P=0.08). After adjusting for GA, use of the Vein Viewer was significantly more likely to lead to successful line placement (adjusted odds ratio 3.05 (1.10, 1.82)).

Conclusion:

The Vein Viewer improved successful placement with the most benefit seen in infants of greater GA.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

References

  1. Pettit J, Mason-Wyckoff M . Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Guidelines for Practice. National Association of Neonatal Nurses: Glenview, IL, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Evans M, Lentsch D . Percutaneously inserted polyurethane central catheters in the NICU: one unit's experience. Neonatal Netw 1999; 18 (6): 37–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Burns D . The Vanderbilt PICC Service: program, procedural and patient outcomes successes. J Assoc Vasc Access 2005; 10 (4): 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Crowley JJ . Vascular access. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 6 (4): 176–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Andreatta P, Chen Y, Marsh M, Cho K . Simulation-based training improves applied clinical placement of ultrasound-guided PICCs. Support Care Cancer 2011; 19 (4): 539–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Infusion Nurses Society. Peripherally inserted central catheters: position statement. J Infus Nurs 2006; 20: 172–174.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pettit J . Technological advances for PICC placement and management. Adv Neonatal Care 2007; 7 (3): 122–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goren A, Laufer J, Yativ N, Kuint J, Ackon M, Rubinshtein M et al. Transillumination of the palm for venipuncture in infants. Pediatr Emerg Care 2001; 17 (2): 130–131.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Christie Medical Holdings. VeinViewer Vision (Internet), 2011 (cited 2011 Aug 3). Available from http://www.christiedigital.com/en-us/medical/products/veinviewer-vision-vascular-access/pages/default.aspx.

  10. Hess H . A biomedical device to improve pediatric vascular access success. Pediatr Nurs 2010; 36 (5): 259–263.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Infusion Nurses Society. Infusion nursing specialty practice. J Infus Nurs 2006; 29 (1): S1–S92.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Perry A, Caviness A, Hsu D . Efficacy of a near-infrared light device in pediatric intravenous cannulation. Pediatr Emerg Care 2011; 27 (1): 5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, University Hospitals of Cleveland Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA

    K Phipps, A Modic, M A O'Riordan & M Walsh

Authors
  1. K Phipps
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A Modic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M A O'Riordan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M Walsh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K Phipps.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Phipps, K., Modic, A., O'Riordan, M. et al. A randomized trial of the Vein Viewer versus standard technique for placement of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in neonates. J Perinatol 32, 498–501 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2011.129

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2011.129

Keywords

  • vascular access
  • vein visualization technology
  • newborn
  • successful venipuncture
  • venous catheterization

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links