Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Labor analgesia for patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes

Abstract

Objective:

Cervical examination is relatively contraindicated in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), limiting our ability to determine the onset of labor by traditional definition (contractions with cervical change). We sought to determine whether two maternal requests for analgesia within 3 h predicted delivery within 24 h to allow appropriate epidural placement.

Study design:

We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients with PPROM for a period of 18 months. Our primary outcome was the percentage of women with PPROM (<34 weeks) who delivered within 24 h from the second analgesia request.

Result:

Among women with PPROM, 63% delivered within 24 h from their second request for analgesia and 98% delivered within 48 h.

Conclusion:

Two medication requests within 3 h for regular, painful contractions can be used as an indicator of onset of labor in women with PPROM to allow for labor analgesia.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion number 269: analgesia and cesarean delivery rates. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 369–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cunningham FG, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Gilstrap L, Bloom SL, Wenstrom KD . Normal labor and delivery. Rouse D, Rainey B, Spong C, Wendel Jr. GD (eds). Williams Obstetrics (22nd edn.) McGraw-Hill: New York, 2005, pp 409–442.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eltzschig HK, Lieberman ES, Camann WR . Medical progress: regional anesthesia and analgesia for labor and delivery. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bailit JL, Dierker L, Blanchard MH, Mercer BM . Outcomes of women presenting in active versus latent phase of spontaneous labor. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105: 77–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mercer BM . Preterm premature rupture of the membranes: current approaches to evaluation and management. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2005; 32: 411–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pates JA, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ . Uterine contractions preceding labor. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 566–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 80: premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 1007–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thorp JA, Hu DH, Albin RM, McNitt J, Meyer BA, Cohen GR et al. The effect of intrapartum epidural analgesia on nulliparous labor: a randomized, controlled, prospective trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 851–858.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Alexander JM, Lucas MJ, Ramin SM, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ . The course of labor with and without epidural analgesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178: 516–520.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sharma SK, Alexander JM, Messick G, Bloom SL, McIntire DD, Wiley J et al. Cesarean delivery: a randomized trial of epidural analgesia versus intravenous meperidine analgesia during labor in nulliparous women. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: 546–551.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Leighton BL, Halpern SH . Epidural analgesia: effects on labor progress and maternal and neonatal outcome. Semin Perinatol 2002; 26: 122–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wong CA, Scavone BM, Peaceman AM, McCarthy RJ, Sullivan JT, Diaz NT et al. The risk of cesarean delivery with neuraxial analgesia given early versus late in labor. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 655–665.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cameron CM, Scott DA, McDonald WM, Davies MJ . A review of neuraxial epidural morbidity. Anesthesiology 2007; 106: 997–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dawson SJ . Epidural catheter infections. J Hosp Infect 20001; 47: 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bricker L, Lavender T . Parenteral opiods for labor pain relief: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: S94–S109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cesario SK . Reevaluation of Friedman's labor curve: a pilot study. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2004; 33: 713–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kilpatrick S, Garrison E . Normal labor and delivery. In: Gabbe SG, Niebyl SR, Simpson JL (eds). Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies 5th edn. Churchill Livingstone: Philadelphia, 2007, pp 303–321.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Albers LL, Schiff M, Gorwoda JG . The length of active labor in normal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 355–359.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang J, Troendle JF, Yancey MK . Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 824–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoffman MK, Vahratian A, Sciscione AC, Troendle JF, Zhang J . Comparison of labor progression between induced and noninduced multiparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 1029–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M L Chichester.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chichester, M., Hoffman, M., Colmorgen, G. et al. Labor analgesia for patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes. J Perinatol 30, 650–654 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2010.18

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2010.18

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links