Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Parents' perception of the back-transport of very-low-birth-weight infants to community hospitals

Abstract

Objective:

To characterize parents' perception of back-transport of very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants from a regional referral neonatal intensive care unit (RR-NICU) to a community hospital (CH) for convalescent care.

Study Design:

Mixed methods utilizing parental interview and medical record review.

Result:

Overall, 20% of parents selected the CH to which their child was transferred. Less than half of the parents wanted the transfer. Psychological comfort with the RR-NICU was the most frequently reported reason for opposing transfer. At the time of home discharge, most parents were satisfied with the transfer and felt prepared to care for their infant at home.

Conclusion:

Parents want their infants closer to home, but are worried about the unknown. They are willing to forfeit autonomy in decision-making regarding the site of convalescent care. Parents need better preparation for transfer. Including them in an advisory group that reviews transfer policies could ameliorate the transition.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McCormick MC . Access to neonatal intensive care. Future Child 1995; 5 (Issue: 1): 162–175.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gates M, Shelton S . Back-transfer in neonatal care. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 1989; 2: 39–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Miles M, Huberman AM . Qualitative data analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, Inc.; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boeije H . A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Qual Quant 2002; 36: 391–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. SPSS for Windows, Release 14.0. Chicago (IL): SPSS, Inc.; 2005.

  6. Meyer CL, Mahan CK, Schreiner RL . Retransfer of newborns to community hospitals: Questionnaire survey of parents' feelings. Perinatol-Neonatol 1982; 6: 75–77.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kuhnly JE, Freston MS . Back-transport: exploration of parents' feelings regarding the transition. Neonatal Netw 1993; 12: 49–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Page J, Lunyk-Child O . Parental perceptions of infant transfer from an NICU to a community nursery: implications for research and practice. Neonatal Netw 1995; 14: 69–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Slattery MJ, Flanagan V, Cronenwett LR, Meade SK, Chase NS . Mothers' perceptions of the quality of their infants' back transfer. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1998; 27: 394–401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lainwala S, Perritt R, Poole K, Vohr B, for the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Neurodevelopmental and growth outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants who are transferred from neonatal intensive care units to level I or II nurseries. Pediatrics 2007; 119: e1079–e1087.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hibbard JH, Stockard J, Tusler M . Performance reports: impact on quality, market share, and reputation. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005; 24: 1150–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hibbard JH, Peters E, Dixon A, Tusler M . Consumer competencies and the use of comparative quality information: it isn't just about literacy. Med Care Res Rev 2007; 64: 379–394.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hanrahan K, Gates M, Attar M, Lang SW, Frohna A, Clark SJ . Neonatal back transport: perspectives from parents of Medicaid-insured infants and providers. Neonatal Netw 2007; 26: 301–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Woodward GA, Fleegler EW . Should parents accompany pediatric interfacility ground ambulance transports? The parent's perspective. Pediatr Emerg Care 2000; 16: 383–390.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Woodward GA, Fleegler EW . Should parents accompany pediatric interfacility ground ambulance transports? Results of a national survey of pediatric transport team managers. Pediatr Emerg Care 2001; 17: 22–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hawthorne J, Killen M . Transferring babies between units: issues for parents. Infant 2006; 2: 44–46.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cagan J . Weaning parents from intensive care unit care. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurse 1988; 13: 275–277.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Donohue PK, Hussey-Gardner B, Sulpar LJ, Fox R, Aucott SW . Convalescent care of NICU infants in community hospitals: risk or benefit? Pediatrics. 2009; in press.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Johns Hopkins Children's Center Telethon Funds.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P K Donohue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Donohue, P., Hussey-Gardner, B., Sulpar, L. et al. Parents' perception of the back-transport of very-low-birth-weight infants to community hospitals. J Perinatol 29, 575–581 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2009.17

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2009.17

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links