Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Childbirth practices in rural Rajasthan, India: implications for neonatal health and survival


In a rural community of Rajasthan in north India, we explored family, community and provider practices during labor and childbirth, which are likely to influence newborn health outcomes. A range of qualitative data-gathering methods was applied in two rural clusters of Udaipur district. This paper reports on the key findings from eight direct observations of labor and childbirth at home and in primary health facilities, as well as 10 focus group discussions, 18 case interviews with recently delivered women and 39 key informant interviews carried out within the community. Although most families preferred home delivery, health-facility deliveries were preferred for first births, especially among adolescents. A team of birth attendants led by a traditional birth attendant or an elder female relative took decisions and performed key functions during home childbirth. Modern providers were commonly invited to administer intramuscular oxytocin injections to hasten home delivery, whereas health staff tended to do the same during facility deliveries. The practice of applying forceful fundal pressure, stemming from overriding concern about the woman's inability to deliver spontaneously, was near universal in both situations. In both facilities and homes, monitoring of labor was largely restricted to repeated unhygienic vaginal examinations with little or no monitoring of fetal or maternal well-being. Babies born at home remained lying on the wet floor till the placenta was delivered. The cord was usually tied using available twine or ceremonial thread and cut using a new blade. In facility settings, drying and wrapping of the baby after birth was delayed and preparedness for resuscitation was minimal. Families believed in delaying breast-feeding till 3 days after birth, when they believed breast milk became available. Even hospital staff discharged the mother and newborn without efforts to initiate breast-feeding. A combination of traditional and modern practices, rooted in the concept of inducing heat to facilitate labor, occurred in both home and facility delivery settings. Programs to improve neonatal survival in such rural settings will need to invest both in strengthening primary health services provided during labor and delivery through training and monitoring, and in community promotion of improved newborn care practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Lawn EJ, Cousens S, Zupan J . 4 million neonatal deaths: when? where? why? Lancet 2005. published online 3 March 2005. (accessed on 19 July 2007).

  2. Campbell OMR, Graham WJ . Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works. Lancet 2006; 368: 1284–1299. (accessed on 19 July 2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhutto ZA, Darmstadt GL, Hasan BS, Haws RA . Community based interventions for improving perinatal and neonatal health outcomes in developing countries: a review of the evidence. Pediatrics 2005; 115 (2): 519–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith JR, Brennan BG . Management of the third stage of labor. E-medicine. (accessed on 19 July 2007).

  5. Sharma JB, Pundir P, Kumar A, Murthy NS . Drotaverine hydrochloride vs Valethamate bromide in acceleration of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001; 74 (3): 255–260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. World Health Organization. Integrated Management of Pregnancy and Childbirth: Pregnancy, Childbirth, Postpartum and Newborn Care: a Guide for Essential Practice. World Health Organization: Geneva, 2003.

  7. Lefeber Y, Voorhoever H . Practices and beliefs of traditional birth attendants: lessons for obstetrics in the north? Trop Med Int Health 1997; 2 (12): 1175–1179.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. World Health Organization. 1997 Care in normal birth: A practical guide. Report of a Technical Working Group. Department of Reproductive health and Research. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1997.

  9. Goer H . Labor dystocia, failure to progress, cephalopelvic disproportion and active management. In: Goer H (ed) Obstetric Myths Verses Research Realities: a Guide to the Medical Literature. Bergin and Garvey: Westport, Connecticut, 1995, pp 83–106.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Merrill DC, Frank JZ . CME: Oxytocin for Induction and Augmentation of Labor. Southern Medical Association, 2001. Accessed on 3 March 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zheng QL, Zhang XM . Analysis of 39 cases of maternal deaths caused by incorrect use of oxytocin. Chin J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 29: 317.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Iyengar SD . Maternal health scenario: a case study of Rajasthan, India (findings from primary data collection). Presentation made at Final Meeting for Safe Motherhood Case Studies for South Asia. Indian Institute of Management: Ahmedabad, India, 2008, pp 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sharan M, Strobino D, Ahmed S . Intrapartum oxytocin use for labor acceleration in rural India. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005; 90 (3): 251–257.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jefferey P, Das A, Dasgupta J, Jeffrey R . Unmonitored intrapartum oxytocin use in home deliveries: evidence from Uttar Pradesh, India. Reprod Health Matters 2007; 15 (30): 172–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hollen CV . Invoking vali: painful technologies of modern birth in south India. Med Anthropol Q 2003; 17 (1): 49–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ugboma HA, Akani CI . Abdominal massage: another cause of maternal mortality. Niger J Med 2004; 13 (3): 259–262.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Seaward PG, Hannah ME, Myhr TL, Farine D, Ohlsson A, Wang EE et al. International Multicentre Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes Study: evaluation of predictors of clinical chorioamnionitis and postpartum fever in patients with prelabor rupture pf membranes at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177 (5): 1024–1029.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Maharaj D . Puerperal Pyrexia: a review. Part I. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2007; 62 (6): 393–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. World Health Organization. Global burden of maternal sepsis in the year 2000. (accessed on 19 July 2007).

  20. World Health Organization. Postpartum care of the mother and newborn: a practical guide. Report of a Technical Working Group. Maternal and Newborn Health/Safe Motherhood Unit, Division of Reproductive Health (Technical Support). WHO/RHT/MSM/98.3, Geneva, pp 17–18.

  21. Dare FO, Bako AU, Ezechi OC . Puerperal sepsis: a preventable post-partum complication. Trop Doct 1998; 28 (2): 92–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Maternal Health Division, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India 2006. Janani Suraksha Yojana: Features & Frequently Asked Questions and Answers. (accessed on 1 March 2008).

  23. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. National Rural Health Mission: The Progress So Far.–%20THE%20PROGRESS%20SO%20FAR.htm (accessed on 3 March 2008).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to S D Iyengar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iyengar, S., Iyengar, K., Martines, J. et al. Childbirth practices in rural Rajasthan, India: implications for neonatal health and survival. J Perinatol 28 (Suppl 2), S23–S30 (2008).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links