Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

High normal blood pressure is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease among middle-aged but not in elderly populations: 9-year results of a population-based study

Journal of Human Hypertension volume 27, pages 18–23 (2013)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Data are conflicting and sparse regarding the impact of high normal blood pressure (BP) (systolic BP (SBP) of 130–139 mm Hg or diastolic BP (DBP) of 85–89 mm Hg) on incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) among middle-aged vs elderly population. We examined the risk of BP categories among 6273 participants⩾30 years, free of CVD at baseline, during more than 9.3 years follow-up. Cox regression analysis was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of CVD for normal BP group (SBP between 120–129 mm Hg or DBP between 80–85 mm Hg), high normal BP group and hypertension group (SBP⩾140 mm Hg or DBP⩾90 mm Hg or taking antihypertensive drugs), considering those with optimal BP (SBP<120 mm Hg and DBP<80 mm Hg) as reference. During follow-up, 512 CVD events occurred. There was significant interaction between age and BP categories (P=0.028) in prediction of CVD. In multivariate analysis, HRs (95% CIs) of CVD were 1.62 (1.11–2.37) and 2.20 (1.57–3.09) for middle aged with high normal and hypertensive BP groups, respectively. Among elderly (⩾60 years), HR was 2.09 (1.36–3.21) only for hypertensive ones. High normal BP is a risk factor for incident of CVD only among middle-aged population. Furthermore, the effect of hypertension on incident CVD was stronger among younger population.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Robinson SC, Brucer M . Range of normal blood pressure: a statistical and clinical study of 11,383 persons. Arch Intern Med 1939; 64 (3): 409–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R . Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002; 360 (9349): 1903–1913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo Jr JL et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Hypertension 2003; 42 (6): 1206–1252.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, Cifkova R, Fagard R, Germano G et al. 2007 Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens 2007; 25 (6): 1105–1187.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang Y, Lee ET, Devereux RB, Yeh J, Best LG, Fabsitz RR et al. Prehypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease risk in a population-based sample: the Strong Heart Study. Hypertension 2006; 47 (3): 410–414.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kokubo Y, Kamide K, Okamura T, Watanabe M, Higashiyama A, Kawanishi K et al. Impact of high-normal blood pressure on the risk of cardiovascular disease in a Japanese urban cohort: the Suita study. Hypertension 2008; 52 (4): 652–659.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mainous 3rd AG, Everett CJ, Liszka H, King DE, Egan BM . Prehypertension and mortality in a nationally representative cohort. Am J Cardiol 2004; 94 (12): 1496–1500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Greenlund KJ, Croft JB, Mensah GA . Prevalence of heart disease and stroke risk factors in persons with prehypertension in the United States, 1999–2000. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164 (19): 2113–2118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hadaegh F, Harati H, Ghanbarian A, Azizi F . Prevalence of coronary heart disease among Tehran adults: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. East Mediterr Health J 2009; 15 (1): 157–166.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Motlagh B, O’Donnell M, Yusuf S . Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in the Middle East: a systematic review. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2009; 16 (3): 268–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Azizi F, Rahmani M, Emami H, Madjid M . Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study: rationale and design. CVD Prev 2000; 3: 242–247.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Azizi F, Ghanbarian A, Momenan AA, Hadaegh F, Mirmiran P, Hedayati M . Prevention of non-communicable disease in a population in nutrition transition: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study phase II. Trials 2009; 10: 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hadaegh F, Harati H, Ghanbarian A, Azizi F . Association of total cholesterol versus other serum lipid parameters with the short-term prediction of cardiovascular outcomes: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2006; 13 (4): 571–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Organization WH. http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/1990.

  15. Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, Califf RM, Cheitlin MD, Hochman JS et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40 (7): 1366–1374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Frohlich J, Dobiasova M, Adler L, Francis M . Gender differences in plasma levels of lipoprotein (a) in patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease. Physiol Res 2004; 53 (5): 481–486.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Baruch L . Hypertension and the elderly: more than just blood pressure control. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2004; 6 (5): 249–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kleinbaum DG, Klein M . Survival Analysis, 2nd edn. Springer: New York City, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang Y, Wang QJ . The prevalence of prehypertension and hypertension among US adults according to the new joint national committee guidelines: new challenges of the old problem. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164 (19): 2126–2134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsai PS, Ke TL, Huang CJ, Tsai JC, Chen PL, Wang SY et al. Prevalence and determinants of prehypertension status in the Taiwanese general population. J Hypertens 2005; 23 (7): 1355–1360.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Agyemang C, Owusu-Dabo E . Prehypertension in the Ashanti region of Ghana, West Africa: an opportunity for early prevention of clinical hypertension. Public Health 2008; 122 (1): 19–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sun Z, Zheng L, Wei Y, Li J, Zhang X, Liu S et al. Prevalence and risk factors of the rural adult people prehypertension status in Liaoning Province of China. Circ J 2007; 71 (4): 550–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Conen D, Ridker PM, Buring JE, Glynn RJ . Risk of cardiovascular events among women with high normal blood pressure or blood pressure progression: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2007; 335 (7617): 432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vasan RS, Larson MG, Leip EP, Evans JC, O’Donnell CJ, Kannel WB et al. Impact of high-normal blood pressure on the risk of cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 2001; 345 (18): 1291–1297.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hsia J, Margolis KL, Eaton CB, Wenger NK, Allison M, Wu L et al. Prehypertension and cardiovascular disease risk in the Women's Health Initiative. Circulation 2007; 115 (7): 855–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hadaegh F, Shafiee G, Hatami M, Azizi F . Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure and pulse pressure for prediction of cardiovascular events and mortality in a Middle Eastern population. Blood Press 2011 (e-pub ahead of print).

  27. Gu D, Chen J, Wu X, Duan X, Jones DW, Huang JF et al. Prehypertension and risk of cardiovascular disease in Chinese adults. J Hypertens 2009; 27 (4): 721–729.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Staessen JA, Fagard R, Thijs L, Celis H, Arabidze GG, Birkenhager WH et al. Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. The Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial Investigators. Lancet 1997; 350 (9080): 757–764.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mosley 2nd WJ, Greenland P, Garside DB, Lloyd-Jones DM . Predictive utility of pulse pressure and other blood pressure measures for cardiovascular outcomes. Hypertension 2007; 49 (6): 1256–1264.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. SHEP Cooperative Research Group. Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. Final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). JAMA 1991; 265 (24): 3255–3264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. O’Donnell MJ, Xavier D, Liu L, Zhang H, Chin SL, Rao-Melacini P et al. Risk factors for ischaemic and intracerebral haemorrhagic stroke in 22 countries (the INTERSTROKE study): a case-control study. Lancet 2010; 376 (9735): 112–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Clarke R, Shipley M, Lewington S, Youngman L, Collins R, Marmot M et al. Underestimation of risk associations due to regression dilution in long-term follow-up of prospective studies. Am J Epidemiol 1999; 150 (4): 341–353.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. MacMahon S, Peto R, Cutler J, Collins R, Sorlie P, Neaton J et al. Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 1, prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias. Lancet 1990; 335 (8692): 765–774.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Rothwell PM, Howard SC, Dolan E, O’Brien E, Dobson JE, Dahlof B et al. Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability, maximum systolic blood pressure, and episodic hypertension. Lancet 2010; 375 (9718): 895–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Grant No.121 from the National Research Council of the Islamic Republic of Iran. We express appreciation to the participants of district 13, Tehran, for their enthusiastic support in this study. We would like to thank Ms N Shiva for the English editing of manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Prevention of Metabolic Disorders Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran

    F Hadaegh, R Mohebi, D Khalili, M Hasheminia & F Sheikholeslami

  2. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran

    D Khalili

  3. Endocrine Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran

    F Azizi

Authors
  1. F Hadaegh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R Mohebi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D Khalili
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M Hasheminia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. F Sheikholeslami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. F Azizi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F Hadaegh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hadaegh, F., Mohebi, R., Khalili, D. et al. High normal blood pressure is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease among middle-aged but not in elderly populations: 9-year results of a population-based study. J Hum Hypertens 27, 18–23 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2011.112

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2011.112

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links