Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Does aortic stiffness improve the prediction of coronary heart disease in elderly? The Rotterdam Study

Abstract

It has been demonstrated that aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease. We investigated whether this measure is of use in cardiovascular risk stratification in clinical practice for elderly subjects (mean age 71.5 years). Within the framework of the Rotterdam Study, we stratified subjects free of coronary heart disease (CHD) at baseline into categories of low (<10%), intermediate (10–20%) and high (>20%) 10-year risk of CHD based on Framingham risk factors. Within each risk category, we determined the percentages of subjects moving into a higher or lower risk category when adding aortic stiffness to the Framingham risk factors. Among 2849 participants, 223 CHD events occurred during a median follow-up of 7.9 years. In the low risk group, 5% of the subjects could be reclassified and in the high-risk group, 6% of the subjects could be reclassified to the intermediate-risk group. In the intermediate-risk group 3% could be reclassified to the high-risk group and 6% to the low-risk group. In a population of elderly subjects, aortic stiffness measurement in addition to Framingham risk factors leads to a limited reclassification of subjects in 10-year cardiovascular disease-risk categories. Therefore, aortic stiffness is associated with the risk of CHD in elderly, but provides no additional value in cardiovascular risk stratification.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Conroy RM, Pyorala K, Fitzgerald AP, Sans S, Menotti A, De Backer G et al. Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. Eur Heart J 2003; 24 (11): 987–1003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Expert Panel on Detection EaToHBCiA. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). Jama 2001; 285 (19): 2486–2497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mattace-Raso FU, van der Cammen TJ, Hofman A, van Popele NM, Bos ML, Schalekamp MA et al. Arterial stiffness and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: the Rotterdam Study. Circulation 2006; 113 (5): 657–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sutton-Tyrrell K, Najjar SS, Boudreau RM, Venkitachalam L, Kupelian V, Simonsick EM et al. Elevated aortic pulse wave velocity, a marker of arterial stiffness, predicts cardiovascular events in well-functioning older adults. Circulation 2005; 111 (25): 3384–3390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, Boutouyrie P, Giannattasio C, Hayoz D et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J 2006; 27 (21): 2588–2605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, Cifkova R, Fagard R, Germano G et al. 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens 2007; 25 (6): 1105–1187.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hofman A, Breteler MM, van Duijn CM, Janssen HL, Krestin GP, Kuipers EJ et al. The Rotterdam Study: 2010 objectives and design update. Eur J Epidemiol 2009; 24 (9): 553–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Asmar R, Benetos A, Topouchian J, Laurent P, Pannier B, Brisac AM et al. Assessment of arterial distensibility by automatic pulse wave velocity measurement. Validation and Clinical Application Studies Hypertension 1995; 26 (3): 485–490.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 1997; 20 (7): 1183–1197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Meijer WT, Hoes AW, Rutgers D, Bots ML, Hofman A, Grobbee DE . Peripheral arterial disease in the elderly: The Rotterdam Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1998; 18 (2): 185–192.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kardys I, Kors JA, van der Meer IM, Hofman A, van der Kuip DA, Witteman JC . Spatial QRS-T angle predicts cardiac death in a general population. Eur Heart J 2003; 24 (14): 1357–1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. WHO. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10 ed. WHO: Geneva, 1992.

  13. Nagelkerke N . A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika 1991; 78 (3): 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ash A, Shwartz M . R2: a useful measure of model performance when predicting a dichotomous outcome. Stat Med 1999; 18 (4): 375–384.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Harrell F . Regression Modeling with Application to Linear Models, Logistic Regression and Survival Analysis. New York, NY: Springer-Verslag, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Efron BTR . An Introdution to Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall: New York, 1993.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Steyerberg EW . Clinical Prediction Models. Springer: New york, NY, 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Cook NR, Buring JE, Ridker PM . The Effect of Including C-Reactive Protein in Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Models for women. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145 (1): 21–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Steyerberg EW, Pencina MJ . Reclassification calculations for persons with incomplete follow-up. Ann Intern Med 2010; 152 (3): 195–196;author reply 6–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Boutouyrie P, Tropeano AI, Asmar R, Gautier I, Benetos A, Lacolley P et al. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of primary coronary events in hypertensive patients: a longitudinal study. Hypertension 2002; 39 (1): 10–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Blacher J, Safar ME, Guerin AP, Pannier B, Marchais SJ, London GM . Aortic pulse wave velocity index and mortality in end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int 2003; 63 (5): 1852–1860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cruickshank K, Riste L, Anderson SG, Wright JS, Dunn G, Gosling RG . Aortic pulse-wave velocity and its relationship to mortality in diabetes and glucose intolerance: an integrated index of vascular function? Circulation 2002; 106 (16): 2085–2090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Meaume S, Benetos A, Henry OF, Rudnichi A, Safar ME . Aortic pulse wave velocity predicts cardiovascular mortality in subjects &gt;70 years of age. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2001; 21 (12): 2046–2050.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. van Popele NM, Mattace-Raso FU, Vliegenthart R, Grobbee DE, Asmar R, van der Kuip DA et al. Aortic stiffness is associated with atherosclerosis of the coronary arteries in older adults: the Rotterdam Study. J hypertens 2006; 24 (12): 2371–2376.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mosterd A, Hoes AW, de Bruyne MC, Deckers JW, Linker DT, Hofman A et al. Prevalence of heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction in the general population; The Rotterdam Study. Eur Heart J 1999; 20 (6): 447–455.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mitchell GF, Hwang SJ, Vasan RS, Larson MG, Pencina MJ, Hamburg NM et al. Arterial stiffness and cardiovascular events: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2010; 121 (4): 505–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ware JH . The limitations of risk factors as prognostic tools. N Engl J Med 2006; 355 (25): 2615–2617.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chambless LE, Folsom AR, Sharrett AR, Sorlie P, Couper D, Szklo M et al. Coronary heart disease risk prediction in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56 (9): 880–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Koller MT, Steyerberg EW, Wolbers M, Stijnen T, Bucher HC, Hunink MG et al. Validity of the Framingham point scores in the elderly: results from the Rotterdam study. Am Heart J 2007; 154 (1): 87–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by Grant IS042015 of SenterNovem (Ministry of Economic Affairs, The Netherlands) and by Esaote SpA, Genoa, Italy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J C M Witteman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Dr Reneman reports having served as a consultant for PIE Medical. The remaining authors report no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verwoert, G., Elias-Smale, S., Rizopoulos, D. et al. Does aortic stiffness improve the prediction of coronary heart disease in elderly? The Rotterdam Study. J Hum Hypertens 26, 28–34 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2010.124

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2010.124

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links