Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Association analysis of formyl peptide receptor 2 (FPR2) polymorphisms and Aspirin exacerbated respiratory diseases

Abstract

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory diseases (AERD) are associated with the metabolism of arachidonic acid. FPR2 (formyl peptide receptor2) is a high-affinity ligand receptor for potent anti-inflammatory lipid metabolites: lipoxins. Thus, functional alterations of the FPR2 may contribute to AERD. We investigated the relationship between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the FPR2 and AERD. Asthmatics were categorized into AERD <15% decreases in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and/or naso-ocular reactions after oral aspirin challenge (n=170) and aspirin-tolerant asthma (ATA, n=268). In all, 11 SNPs were genotyped. FPR2 protein expressions on CD14-positive monocytes in peripheral blood were measured using flow cytometric analysis. We performed RT-PCR of the FPR2 mRNA expressed by peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Logistic regression analysis showed that the minor allele frequency of FPR2 −4209T>G (rs1769490) in intron 2 was significantly lower in the AERD group (n=170) than in the ATA group (n=268) (P=0.006, Pcorr=0.04, recessive model). The decline of FEV1 after aspirin challenge was significantly lower in the subjects with GG homozygotes of FPR2 −4209T>G than those with the other genotypes (P=0.0002). Asthmatic homozygotes for FPR2 −4209T>G minor allele exhibited significantly higher FPR2 protein expression in CD14-positive monocytes than did those with the common allele of FPR24209T>G allele (P=0.01). There was no difference in the expression of the wild form and the exon 2 deleted variant form of FPR2 gene according to the genotypes of FPR2 −4209T>G. The minor allele at FPR2 −4209T>G may have a protective role against the development of AERD, via increase of FPR2 protein expression in inflammatory cells.

Introduction

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory diseases (AERD) refer to the development of bronchoconstriction in asthmatic individuals following the ingestion of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. This syndrome is characterized by the ‘aspirin triad,’ which consists of aspirin hypersensitivity, bronchial asthma, nasal polyposis and chronic hyperplastic eosinophilic sinusitis.1, 2, 3 Similar to other asthmatic individuals, the airways of patients with AERD show signs of persistent inflammation with marked eosinophilia, epithelial disruption, cytokine production and upregulation of inflammatory molecules.4 Overproduction or underproduction of critical modulators important for the metabolism of arachidonic acids, including leukotrienes, lipoxins, thromboxane and prostaglandins, likely accounts for the observed susceptibility to aspirin. Variations within the genes of the arachidonate pathway are responsible for changes in the production and metabolism of these modulators. Polymorphisms in genes such as LTC4S,5 ALOX5,6 PTGER2,7 PTGER3,8 CYSLTR2,9 TBXA2R10 and CYSLTR111 have previously been shown to be associated with AERD. Among the proteins encoded by these genes, the cysteinyl leukotriene (CysLT) receptor is selectively antagonized by several currently available leukotriene modifiers, including montelukast, pranlukast and zafirlukast. However, clinical studies have demonstrated that the response to these medications is incomplete.12, 13 These results suggest that an alternative pathway that does not include CysLT or the CystLT receptor may lead to aspirin hypersensitivity in asthma.

Both LXA4 and aspirin- triggered 15-epi lipoxin 4 (ATL) serve as ‘stop’ signals for leukocyte trafficking, facilitating the resolution of inflammatory responses.14, 15 These responses are mediated by formyl peptide receptor 2 (FPR2, also known as FPRL1, ALXR, HM63, FMLPX, FPR2A, FPRH1 and FPRH2), which is the surface membrane seven-transmembrane G-protein-coupled receptors. FPR2 is expressed by various kinds of inflammatory cells, including macrophages, monocytes, neutrophils, T lymphocytes, bronchial epithelial cells and microvascular endothelial cells.16, 17 These inflammatory cells are involved in the pathogenesis of asthma and in asthmatic subphenotypes, including aspirin hypersensitivity. On the basis of these biological functions, genetic alterations in FPR2 may be postulated to contribute to the pathophysiological processes of AERD. However, a comprehensive genetic analysis of FPR2 in patients with AERD has not been performed to date. To investigate the genetic role of FPR2 in AERD, we identified single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the FPR2 and performed genetic association analyses and functional validation studies to determine the association between the alterations in FPR2 with the risk of AERD.

Materials and methods

Subjects and aspirin challenge

Subjects were recruited from the Asthma Genome Research Center, which is comprised of nine university hospitals in Korea. All subjects were Korean. All patients were diagnosed by physicians based on the definition of asthma by the Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines.18 All patients had a history of dyspnea and wheezing during the previous 12 months and also met one of the following criteria: (1) >15% increase in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) or >12% increase plus 200 ml following inhalation of a short-acting bronchodilator, (2) <10 mg ml−1 PC20 methacholine and (3) >20% increase in FEV1 following 2 weeks of treatment with inhaled steroids and long-acting bronchodilators. A total of 24 common inhalant allergens were utilized for a skin prick test. Atopy was defined as having a wheal reaction equal to or greater than 3 mm in diameter or than that of histamine. Total IgE was measured using the CAP system (Pharmacia Diagnostics, Uppsala, Sweden).

Asthmatic patients had experienced no exacerbation of asthma or respiratory tract infection in the 6 weeks preceding oral aspirin challenge. Oral aspirin challenge was performed with increasing doses of aspirin using methods slightly modified from those described previously.2, 19 Briefly, the patient having history of aspirin hypersensitivity was given 30 mg and those having no history started 100 mg of aspirin orally. Respiratory and naso-ocular symptoms, blood pressure, external signs (urticaria and angio-oedema) and FEV1 were documented every 30 min for a period of 1.5 h. In the absence of any symptoms or signs suggestive of adverse reaction, 60 mg or 100 mg of aspirin was administered and the same measurements were repeated every 1 h, with a final dose of 450 mg or until the patient developed a reaction. If no reaction occurred 4 h after the final dose, the test was deemed negative. Aspirin-induced bronchospasms, reflected by decline (%) of FEV1, were calculated as the pre-challenge FEV1 minus the post-challenge FEV1 divided by the pre-challenge FEV1. Oral aspirin challenge reactions were categorized into two groups as follows: (1) 15% or greater decrease in FEV1 and/or naso-ocular reactions (AERD) or (2) less than 15% decrease in FEV1 without naso-ocular or cutaneous reactions (aspirin tolerant asthma (ATA)). The ethics committee at each hospital approved the protocols and a written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Genotyping of FPR2 polymorphisms

In all, 11 polymorphisms found in the FPR2 in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (Build 36) were selected for this study, and amplification and extension primers were designed for genotyping each of the polymorphic sites by single-base extension.20 All primer extension reactions were performed using the SNaPshot ddNTP Primer Extension Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Following the extension reaction, the reaction mixtures were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h with 1 U of shrimp alkaline phosphatase, followed by incubation for 15 min at 72 °C to inactivate the enzyme. The extension products and Geescan 120 Liz size standard solution were then mixed with Hi-Di formamide according to the manufacturer’s instructions and incubated at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 5 min on ice. The products of the reaction mixture were resolved using an ABI Prism 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Results were analyzed using GeneScan and Genotyper (Applied Biosystems). Primer sequences are shown in Supplementary Table 1. For quality control for genotyping, 16 blank and 16 duplicate were used, and the concordance rate was 100% in this study.

Measurement of FPR2 protein expression on CD14-positive monocytes of asthmatics

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were purified from the heparinized peripheral blood of the study subjects by using a density gradient reagent (Histopaque 1077). FITC-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA), FPR2 antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-human CD14 antibody (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) were incubated with 5 × 105 cell ml−1 PBMC and then washed twice with PBS. The stained cells were analyzed by using a flow cytometer (FACScan; Becton-Dickinson, Mountain View, CA, USA). For isotype-matched controls, FITC-conjugated Rabbit IgG (Abcam) and PE-conjugated mouse IgG1 isotype (R&D Systems) were used with the same concentration of each antibody tested. The stained cells were analyzed by using a flow cytometer (FACScan; Becton-Dickinson) and Cell Quest Software (Counter Corporation, Miami, FL, USA). Levels of FPR2 protein expression are monocyte X-mean FPR2/Isotype. Percentage of CD14 (+) monocytes is monocyte gate% FPR2-Isotype.

RNA extraction and RT-PCR of FPR2 mRNA

Total RNA of PBMC was isolated using the modified guanidium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction method. We quantified RNA and reverse transcribed cDNA from 3 μg of total RNA. DNase I (10 000 U ml−1; Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA)-treated RNA was reverse-transcribed by incubating with 0.5 mM dNTP, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM DTT, 1 μl of random hexamer (50 μg μl−1) and SuperScript II RT (200 U μl−1; Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) at 42 °C for 50 min, and heat inactivated at 70 °C for 15 min. Specific primer pairs for RT-PCR were as follows GAPDH forward; 5′-IndexTermACCCAGAAGACTGTGGATGG-3′, GAPDH reverse; 5′-IndexTermTTCTAGACGGCAGGTCAGGT-3′ and FPR2 forward; 5′-IndexTermGCACACAGGAAAAGGAGCTT-3′, FPR2 reverse; and 5′-IndexTermACAGATGGTGGTGACTGTGC-3′. Amplification was performed for 35 cycles (one cycle: 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 55 °C and 40 s at 72 °C) with initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The size and amount of the PCR products generated were determined by agarose gel electrophoresis in the presence of ethidium bromide and analyzed with the Kodak EDAS 1D analysis package. The sequence of RT-PCR products was determined using the BLAST search program after direct sequencing.

Statistical analysis

We applied two widely used measures of linkage disequilibrium to all pairs of biallelic loci: Lewontin's D′ (D)21 and r2. Haplotypes for each individual were inferred using the PHASE algorithm (ver. 2.0), developed by Stephens et al.22 Genotype and haplotype distributions were analyzed using logistic models with age (continuous value), gender (male=0, female=1), smoking status (non-smoker=0, ex-smoker=1, smoker=2), atopy (absence=0, presence=1) and BMI as covariates. Differences in the decline of FEV1 following aspirin challenge among the genotypes were examined using independent t-test. Statistical data were managed and analyzed using SAS version 9.1 (SAS, Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and SPSS version 11.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). To correct P-values, the effective number of independent markers in FPR2 was calculated using SNPSpD software (http://genepi.qimr.edu.au/general/daleN/SNPSpD).23 This program is based on the spectral decomposition of matrices of pairwise linkage disequilibrium between SNPs (P-value X 6.7767). Corrected P-values less than 0.05 were regarded as being statistically significant. Intergroup comparisons of FPR2 expression were assessed by the non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis H-test for continuous data. If differences were found to be statistically significant, Mann–Whitney U-test was applied to analyze differences between the two groups. The FPR2 protein expressions are expressed as the mean±s.e. of the mean (s.e.m.).

P-values less than 0.05 were regarded as being statistically significant.

Results

Characteristics of the study subjects

A total of 438 subjects were recruited from the asthma cohort. The clinical characteristics of the study subjects are summarized in Table 1 . Significant differences in onset age of asthma, prevalence of smoking and BMI were found between the AERD and the ATA groups (P<0.05, Table 2 ). Aspirin-induced declines in FEV1 of −15 to 68% were observed.

Table 1 Clinical profile of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory diseases (AERD) and aspirin-tolerant asthma (ATA)
Table 2 Logistic analysis for the risk of aspirin intolerance associated with FPR2 polymorphisms controlled for age, sex, atopy, smoking status and BMI in Korean asthmatics

Frequencies and haplotype construction of FPR2 polymorphisms

In all, 11 polymorphic SNPs in the FPR2 gene were selected in the National Center for Biotechnology Information SNP database (NCBI SNP DB; build 36). In build 36 of NCBI SNP DB, there were no SNPs in exon 1 and 2 (Figure 1a). The minor allele frequencies of the 11 SNPs in the study subjects are summarized in Supplementary Table 2. The distributions of all loci were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (P>0.05). The linkage disequilibrium coefficients (D) and r2 for the FPR2 polymorphisms were calculated for all study subjects (Figure 1c). Absolute linkage disequilibrium (D=1 and r2=1) was present between −1750T>C and +1315A>G. Tight linkages were also observed between −4209T>G and −2940C>T (r2>0.99), and among −1750T>C, −1365G>A, −970T>C, −894C>A and −421A>G (r2>0.95). Ten haplotypes were constructed from the 11 SNPs. Among these haplotypes, FPR2-ht2 and FPR2-ht3 (frequency > 0.05) were used for analysis, because FPR2-ht1 and FPR2-ht4 were almost tagged with −1825C>G and −1750T>C, respectively.

Figure 1
figure1

Gene map indicating haplotypes of the formyl peptide receptor2 (FPR2). (a) Gene map and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of FPR2, located on chromosome 19q13.3–q13.4. Coding exons are indicated by black blocks, and the 5′ and 3′-untranslated regions (UTRs) by white blocks. The base at which translation begins was denoted as nucleotide +1. (b) FPR2 haplotypes. (c) Linkage disequilibrium coefficients (D’ and r2) among FPR2 SNPs.

Association of FPR2 polymorphisms with the risk of aspirin intolerance in asthmatics

All of the single SNPs and two haplotypes (ht2 and ht3) were analyzed for association with the risk of AERD using logistic models (Table 2). Association analysis revealed that two SNPs, FPR2 −4209T>G and −2940C>T, were significantly associated with AERD in the recessive model (P=0.006 and 0.01). The other SNPs and haplotypes and haplotypes were not associated with the risk of AERD. After correction for multiple comparisons, the significant difference remained only for FPR2 −4209T>G (Pcorr=0.04). The frequency of the homozygous GG genotype for FPR2 −4209T>G was three times lower in AERD patients, a significant difference from ATA patients (4.4% and 13.5%, respectively).

Differences in the rates of FEV1 decline following aspirin challenge among the genotypes and haplotypes were examined using multiple regression models (Figure 2). Asthmatics homozygous for the minor allele of FPR2 4209T>G exhibited a lower decline in FEV1 induced by aspirin provocation than did heterozygotes and homozygotes carrying the common allele (11.66±0.76 % vs 6.24±1.19%, P=0.0002, Figure 2).

Figure 2
figure2

Comparison of the decline of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (%) induced by aspirin provocation between subjects possessing different alleles of FPR2: -4209T>G. P-values were obtained by linear regression analysis, controlled for age (continuous value), sex (male=0, female=1), atopy status (non-atopy=0, atopy=1), smoking status (non-smoker=0, ex-smoker=1, smoker=2) and body mass index (BMI) as co-variables.

Comparison of FPR2 protein expression between FPR2 −4209T>G genotypes using flow cytometry

To determine whether the sequence variants of FPR2 −4209T>G affected expression of the FPR2 protein, we measured FPR2 expression in CD14-positive (CD14 (+)) monocytes by flow cytometry (Figure 3a and b). FPR2 protein expression was measured in those obtained from asthmatics with the following genotypes: FPR24209TT (n=26), FPR2 −4209GG (n=6) and FPR2 −4209TG (n=27). FPR2 expression in CD14 (+) monocytes was significantly different among the three groups (P=0.021). The CD14 (+) monocytes from asthmatic patients homozygous for the minor allele of −4209T>G (GG) exhibited a twofolds higher intensity of fluorescence stain for FPR2 protein than did those from patients having the common allele, FPR2 −4209 T (69.41±22.16 vs 27.91±2.24, respectively; P=0.01, Figure 3c). More than 80% CD14 (+) monocytes expressed the FPR2 protein on their surface regardless of the genotypes of FPR2 −4209T>G (Figure 3d).

Figure 3
figure3

Flow cytometry analysis of formyl peptide receptor2 (FPR2) expression in peripheral blood cells in asthmatics. (a) To identify monocytes among peripheral blood cells, cells were gated by forward scatter and CD14 staining. Points inside the box represent CD14 (+) monocytes. (b) Histogram of FPR2 protein expression in CD14 (+) monocytes. Plot 1, isotype control; Plot2, -4209TT; and Plot3, -4209GG. (c) Mean levels of FPR2 protein expression per CD14 (+) monocyte from asthmatics with the -4209TT, TG and GG genotypes. (d) Percentage of CD14 (+) monocytes of each genotype exhibiting expression of FPR2. A full color version of this figure is available at the Journal of Human Genetics journal online.

Comparison of FPR2 mRNA expression between FPR2 −4209T>G genotypes

To investigate the genetic effect of −4209T>G polymorphism on the alternative splicing of FPR2 on PBMC, RT-PCR for the FPR2 mRNA was performed. As FPR2 −4209T>G is located in the intron 2, we amplified mRNA containing FPR2 using primers to detect alternative splicing as described in methods and Figure 4a. We identified a wild-form (upper band, 360 bp) and an alternative form of FPR2 (lower band, 231 bp) (Figure 4b). The wild and the variant forms were similarly found in the RT-PCR products on mRNA from PBMC of the subjects having −4209GG or those having −4209TT. The sequence of RT-PCR products was determined using the BLAST search program after direct sequencing. The alternative form was a variant deleted of exon 2 of 129 bp. (Figure 4c).

Figure 4
figure4

Comparison of formyl peptide receptor2 (FPR2) mRNA levels from its single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) subtypes. (a) Organization of human FPR2 and diagram of RT-PCR primer. (b) RT-PCR Product size from Exon1 to Exon3 is 231 bp and alternative form of PCR Product size is 360 bp. PBMC containing T allele or G allele was harvested and FPR2 mRNA was measured using by RT-PCR. (c) The alternative form has a new transcript variant.

Discussion

In the present study, we are the first, to the best of our knowledge, to identify a SNP located in the intron of FPR2 that is related to aspirin hypersensitivity in asthmatics. This association was characterized using a case–control association study, followed by functional validation of protein expression. The minor allele frequency of FPR2 −4209T>G significantly differed between the AERD and ATA groups, even after correction for multiple comparisons. Few studies have explored the association of FPR2 polymorphisms with human disease. In a previous association study of FPR2 genetic variants, two SNPs (F110S and C126W), located in the open reading frame of FPR2, were found to be associated with juvenile periodontitis.24 These SNPs were not analyzed in our study, because the design of this study was based on the NCBI DB and these two SNPs were not in NCBI DB. These SNPs were not analyzed in the present study. We found that asthmatics homozygous for the FPR2 4209T>G minor allele exhibited a lower FEV1 decline after aspirin challenge than patients who were heterozygous or homozygous for the common allele. These data indicate that the minor allele of FPR2 −4209T>G may protect against the development of aspirin-induced bronchospasms in asthmatics.

As the FPR2 was initially cloned based on homology to the FPR cDNA,25, 26 the importance of FPR in the host defense against bacterial infections has been demonstrated by the increased susceptibility of Fpr2 knockout mice to Listeria monocytogenes.27 Additionally, the FPR2 has been demonstrated to have novel roles for lipoxin and aspirin-triggered lipoxin in the regulation of T-cell-mediated responses. The lipoxin and aspirin-triggered lipoxin inhibit TNF-alpha secretion from activated T cells via the FPR2.28 In previous functional studies, transcription of FPR2 was shown to be dramatically upregulated by IL-13, IFN-gamma, IL-4 and IL-6.29, 30 All of these modulators are involved in the development of allergic inflammation in asthmatics.28 In the present study, asthmatic patients homozygous for the minor −4209T>G allele exhibited higher FPR2 protein expression and less decrease of FEV1 fall rate after aspirin challenge. This data suggest that FPR2, a high-affinity ligand receptor for lipoxins and lipoxinA4 (LXA4) analogue, may exert protective effect against aspirin induced bronchospasm. Lipoxin A4 generation and lipoxin A4 receptor expression were found to be decreased in airway tissues of patients with severe asthma.31 Thus, downregulation of lipoxin and aspirin-triggered lipoxin may have additive effects on inflammatory reactions in the presence of low-level expression of the FPR2, as seen in AERD.

In the flow cytometry analysis, we found that asthmatic patients homozygous for the rare −4209T>G allele exhibited higher FPR2 protein expression than patients with the common allele. These findings demonstrate that FPR2 protein expression may be dependent on the genetic function of the −4209T>G allele. It is well known that intronic SNPs can affect transcript processing through alternative splicing or producing RNA secondary structure.32, 33, 34 The FPR24209T>G located in the second intron. Therefore, we have checked the presence of alternatively spliced forms of FPR2 by RT-PCR over exon 1 to exon 3. A 231-bp wild form and a new alternative form of 360 bp were clearly visualized. The expression of the two forms of FPR2 are obvious in the both genotypes of FPR2 −4209T>G. This data indicate that the new alternative spliced variants may not be related with the genotypes of FPR2 −4209T>G. However, we did not measure the m-RNA synthesis of the two forms of FPR2 using real time PCR. Further investigation is needed to better understand the genetic mechanism of the intronic SNP of FPR2 on the generation of the wild and the new-spiced variants of this gene.

Another explanation for the differential protein expression of FPR2 may be different rate of mRNA production, which depends on the secondary structure of mRNA. The secondary structure can be predicted with using mfold web server version 3.1.35 The secondary structure containing the T allele of −4209T>G has a ΔG of −150.59 kcal mol−1 and that with G allele has a ΔG of −150.00 kcal mol−1. These data indicate that synthesis rate of FPR2 mRNA may be not different according to the genotypes of FPR2 −4209T>G. Further investigation is needed to better understand the genetic mechanism of the intronic SNP of FPR2 in aspirin induced asthma (AIA) and to clarify the molecular function of the new-spiced variants of this gene.

In conclusion, we genotyped 11 SNPs located within FPR2 and examined their associations with AERD. Logistic analysis showed that FPR2 −4209T>C is associated with AERD. This association was further validated by showing that patients homozygous for the minor allele of FPR2 −4209T>C exhibit higher levels of FPR2 protein expression in CD14 positive peripheral blood monocytes compared with those having the common allele. These data indicate that the minor allele of FPR2 −4209T>G may have a protective role in the development of aspirin hypersensitivity in asthma through an increase in FPR2 protein expression in inflammatory cells. These results may be useful for the development of new methods to diagnose AERD and new therapeutic strategies for the control of aspirin hypersensitivity in asthma.

References

  1. 1

    Stevenson, D. D. & Szczeklik, A. Clinical and pathologic perspectives on aspirin sensitivity and asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 118, 773–786 quiz 87-8 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Lee, R. U. & Stevenson, D. D. Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease: evaluation and management. Allergy Asthma Immunol. Res. 3, 3–10 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Chang, H. S., Park, J. S., Jang, A. S., Park, S. W., Uh, S. T., Kim, Y. H. et al. Diagnostic value of clinical parameters in the prediction of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease in asthma. Allergy Asthma Immunol. Res. 3, 256–264 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Szczeklik, A. & Stevenson, D. D. Aspirin-induced asthma: advances in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 111, 913–921 quiz 22 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Sanak, M., Simon, H. U. & Szczeklik, A. Leukotriene C4 synthase promoter polymorphism and risk of aspirin-induced asthma. Lancet 350, 1599–1600 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Choi, J. H., Park, H. S., Oh, H. B., Lee, J. H., Suh, Y. J., Park, C. S. et al. Leukotriene-related gene polymorphisms in ASA-intolerant asthma: an association with a haplotype of 5-lipoxygenase. Hum Genet. 114, 337–344 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Jinnai, N., Sakagami, T., Sekigawa, T., Kakihara, M., Nakajima, T., Yoshida, K. et al. Polymorphisms in the prostaglandin E2 receptor subtype 2 gene confer susceptibility to aspirin-intolerant asthma: a candidate gene approach. Hum. Mol. Genet. 13, 3203–3217 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Park, H. W., Shin, E. S., Lee, J. E., Kim, S. H., Kim, S. S., Chang, Y. S. et al. Association between genetic variations in prostaglandin E2 receptor subtype EP3 gene (Ptger3) and asthma in the Korean population. Clin. Exp. Allergy 37, 1609–1615 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Park, J. S., Chang, H. S., Park, C. S., Lee, J. H., Lee, Y. M., Choi, J. H. et al. Association analysis of cysteinyl-leukotriene receptor 2 (CYSLTR2) polymorphisms with aspirin intolerance in asthmatics. Pharmacogenet. Genomics 15, 483–492 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Kim, S. H., Choi, J. H., Park, H. S., Holloway, J. W., Lee, S. K., Park, C. S. et al. Association of thromboxane A2 receptor gene polymorphism with the phenotype of acetyl salicylic acid-intolerant asthma. Clin. Exp. Allergy 35, 585–590 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Kim, S. H., Oh, J. M., Kim, Y. S., Palmer, L. J., Suh, C. H., Nahm, D. H. et al. Cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1 promoter polymorphism is associated with aspirin-intolerant asthma in males. Clin. Exp. Allergy 36, 433–439 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Bisgaard, H. Pathophysiology of the cysteinyl leukotrienes and effects of leukotriene receptor antagonists in asthma. Allergy 56 (Suppl 66), 7–11 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Park, J. S., Jang, A. S., Park, S. W., Lee, Y. M., Uh, S. T., Kim, Y. H. et al. Protection of leukotriene receptor antagonist against aspirin-induced bronchospasm in asthmatics. Allergy Asthma Immunol. Res. 2, 48–54 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    McMahon, B. & Godson, C. Lipoxins: endogenous regulators of inflammation. Am. J. Physiol. Renal. Physiol. 286, F189–F201 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Kantarci, A. & Van Dyke, T. E. Lipoxins in chronic inflammation. Crit. Rev. Oral. Biol. Med. 14, 4–12 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Migeotte, I., Communi, D. & Parmentier, M. Formyl peptide receptors: a promiscuous subfamily of G protein-coupled receptors controlling immune responses. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 17, 501–519 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Partida-Sanchez, S., Iribarren, P., Moreno-Garcia, M. E., Gao, J. L., Murphy, P. M., Oppenheimer, N. et al. Chemotaxis and calcium responses of phagocytes to formyl peptide receptor ligands is differentially regulated by cyclic ADP ribose. J. Immunol. 172, 1896–1906 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Bateman, E. D., Hurd, S. S., Barnes, P. J., Bousquet, J., Drazen, J. M., FitzGerald, M. et al. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention: GINA executive summary. Eur. Respir. J. 31, 143–178 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Nizankowska-Mogilnicka, E., Bochenek, G., Mastalerz, L., Swierczynska, M., Picado, C., Scadding, G. et al. EAACI/GA2LEN guideline: aspirin provocation tests for diagnosis of aspirin hypersensitivity. Allergy 62, 1111–1118 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Vreeland, W. N., Meagher, R. J. & Barron, A. E. Multiplexed, high-throughput genotyping by single-base extension and end-labeled free-solution electrophoresis. Anal. Chem. 74, 4328–4333 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Hedrick, P. W. Gametic disequilibrium measures: proceed with caution. Genetics 117, 331–341 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Stephens, M., Smith, N. J. & Donnelly, P. A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 68, 978–989 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Nyholt, D. R. A simple correction for multiple testing for single-nucleotide polymorphisms in linkage disequilibrium with each other. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 74, 765–769 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Gwinn, M. R., Sharma, A. & De Nardin, E. Single nucleotide polymorphisms of the N-formyl peptide receptor in localized juvenile periodontitis. J. Periodontol. 70, 1194–1201 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Bao, L., Gerard, N. P., Eddy, R. L. Jr., Shows, T. B. & Gerard, C. Mapping of genes for the human C5a receptor (C5AR), human FMLP receptor (FPR), and two FMLP receptor homologue orphan receptors (FPRH1, FPRH2) to chromosome 19. Genomics 13, 437–440 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Ye, R. D., Cavanagh, S. L., Quehenberger, O., Prossnitz, E. R. & Cochrane, C. G. Isolation of a cDNA that encodes a novel granulocyte N-formyl peptide receptor. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 184, 582–589 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Gao, J. L., Lee, E. J. & Murphy, P. M. Impaired antibacterial host defense in mice lacking the N-formylpeptide receptor. J. Exp. Med. 189, 657–662 (1999).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Chen, K., Le, Y., Liu, Y., Gong, W., Ying, G., Huang, J. et al. A critical role for the g protein-coupled receptor mFPR2 in airway inflammation and immune responses. J. Immunol. 184, 3331–3335.

  29. 29

    Gronert, K., Gewirtz, A., Madara, J. L. & Serhan, C. N. Identification of a human enterocyte lipoxin A4 receptor that is regulated by interleukin (IL)-13 and interferon gamma and inhibits tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced IL-8 release. J. Exp. Med. 187, 1285–1294 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Chiang, N., Gronert, K., Qiu, F. H. & Serhan, C. N. Lipoxin A4 receptor. Cytokine Reference 2000, 2219–2233 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Planaguma, A., Kazani, S., Marigowda, G., Haworth, O., Mariani, T. J., Israel, E. et al. Airway lipoxin A4 generation and lipoxin A4 receptor expression are decreased in severe asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 178, 574–582 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Pagani, F. & Baralle, F. E. Genomic variants in exons and introns: identifying the splicing spoilers. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, 389–396 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Knight, J. C. Regulatory polymorphisms underlying complex disease traits. J. Mol. Med. 83, 97–109 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Kalnina, Z., Zayakin, P., Silina, K. & Line, A. Alterations of pre-mRNA splicing in cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 42, 342–357 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Zuker, M. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3406–3415 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

DNA samples were generously provided by the Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital Biobank, a member of the National Biobank of Korea, supported by the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, Republic of Korea.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hyoung-Doo Shin or Choon-Sik Park.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on Journal of Human Genetics website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, HJ., Cho, SH., Park, JS. et al. Association analysis of formyl peptide receptor 2 (FPR2) polymorphisms and Aspirin exacerbated respiratory diseases. J Hum Genet 57, 247–253 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/jhg.2012.12

Download citation

Keywords

  • aspirin
  • asthma
  • FPR2 (formyl peptide receptor 2)
  • SNPs (single-nucleotide polymorphisms)

Further reading

Search

Quick links