Abstract
The impact of the introduction and advancement in communication technology in recent years on exposure level of the population is largely unknown. The main aim of this study is to systematically review literature on the distribution of radiofrequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure in the everyday environment in Europe and summarize key characteristics of various types of RF-EMF studies conducted in the European countries. We systematically searched the ISI Web of Science for relevant literature published between 1 January 2000 and 30 April 2015, which assessed RF-EMF exposure levels by any of the methods: spot measurements, personal measurement with trained researchers and personal measurement with volunteers. Twenty-one published studies met our eligibility criteria of which 10 were spot measurements studies, 5 were personal measurement studies with trained researchers (microenvironmental), 5 were personal measurement studies with volunteers and 1 was a mixed methods study combining data collected by volunteers and trained researchers. RF-EMF data included in the studies were collected between 2005 and 2013. The mean total RF-EMF exposure for spot measurements in European “Homes” and “Outdoor” microenvironments was 0.29 and 0.54 V/m, respectively. In the personal measurements studies with trained researchers, the mean total RF-EMF exposure was 0.24 V/m in “Home” and 0.76 V/m in “Outdoor”. In the personal measurement studies with volunteers, the population weighted mean total RF-EMF exposure was 0.16 V/m in “Homes” and 0.20 V/m in “Outdoor”. Among all European microenvironments in “Transportation”, the highest mean total RF-EMF 1.96 V/m was found in trains of Belgium during 2007 where more than 95% of exposure was contributed by uplink. Typical RF-EMF exposure levels are substantially below regulatory limits. We found considerable differences between studies according to the type of measurements procedures, which precludes cross-country comparison or evaluating temporal trends. A comparable RF-EMF monitoring concept is needed to accurately identify typical RF-EMF exposure levels in the everyday environment.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 6 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $43.17 per issue
Buy this article
Purchase on Springer Link
Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ICT Facts and Figures (Internet). International Telecommunication Union (2016). Available from https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/ICTFactsFigures2016.pdf.
Sahota D . Small cells outnumber cellular base stations (Internet). Telecoms; 2012 (cited 21 February 2017). Available from http://telecoms.com/51947/small-cells-outnumber-cellular-base-stations/.
Bornkessel C, Schubert M, Wuschek M, Schmidt P . Determination of the general public exposure around GSM and UMTS base stations. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2007; 124: 40–47.
Frei P, Mohler E, Neubauer G, Theis G, Bürgi A, Fröhlich J et al. Temporal and spatial variability of personal exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields. Environ Res 2009; 109: 779–785.
Gajšek P, Ravazzani P, Wiart J, Grellier J, Samaras T, Thuróczy G . Electromagnetic field exposure assessment in Europe radiofrequency fields (10 MHz–6 GHz). J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2015; 25: 37–44.
Joseph W, Vermeeren G, Verloock L, Heredia MM, Martens L . Characterization of personal RF electromagnetic field exposure and actual absorption for the general public. Health Phys 2008; 95: 317–330.
Röösli M, Frei P, Bolte J, Neubauer G, Cardis E, Feychting M et al. Conduct of a personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurement study: proposed study protocol. Environ Health 2010; 9: 23.
Rowley J, Joyner K . Comparative international analysis of radiofrequency exposure surveys of mobile communication radio base stations. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2012; 22: 304–315.
Urbinello D, Huss A, Beekhuizen J, Vermeulen R, Röösli M . Use of portable exposure meters for comparing mobile phone base station radiation in different types of areas in the cities of Basel and Amsterdam. Sci Total Environ 2014a; 468–469: 1028–1033.
Urbinello D, Joseph W, Huss A, Verloock L, Beekhuizen J, Vermeulen R et al. Radio-frequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure levels in different European outdoor urban environments in comparison with regulatory limits. Environ Int. 2014c; 68: 49–54.
Urbinello D, Joseph W, Verloock L, Martens L, Röösli M . Temporal trends of radio-frequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure in everyday environments across European cities. Environ Res 2014b; 134: 134–142.
Kim K, Kim H-J, Song DJ, Cho YM, Choi JW . Risk perception and public concerns of electromagnetic waves from cellular phones in Korea: Public Risk Perception of EMF from Cellular Phones. Bioelectromagnetics 2014; 35: 235–244.
Tjong L, Grzechnik M, Karipidis K, Tinker R, Communicating with the Public—Recent ARPANSA Updates. In: Proc the 40th Australasian Radiation Protection Society Conference p. 6–9 (Canberra, Australia, 2015).
Wiedemann PM, Boerner FU, Repacholi MH . Do people understand IARC’s 2B categorization of RF fields from cell phones?: IARC’s 2B Categorization for Cell Phones. Bioelectromagnetics 2014; 35: 373–378.
World Health Organization. WHO Research Agenda for Radiofrequency Fields. 2010 (cited 29 February 2010). Available from http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44396.
Sagar S, Struchen B, Finta V, Eeftens M, Röösli M . Use of portable exposimeters to monitor radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure in the everyday environment. Environ Res 2016; 150: 289–298.
Joseph W, Frei P, Roösli M, Thuróczy G, Gajsek P, Trcek T et al. Comparison of personal radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure in different urban areas across Europe. Environ Res 2010; 110: 658–663.
Joseph W, Verloock L, Goeminne F, Vermeeren G, Martens L . Assessment of RF exposures from emerging wireless communication technologies in different environments. Health Phys 2012a; 102: 161–172.
Vermeeren G, Markakis I, Goeminne F, Samaras T, Martens L, Joseph W . Spatial and temporal RF electromagnetic field exposure of children and adults in indoor micro environments in Belgium and Greece. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2013; 113: 254–263.
Bürgi A, Theis G, Siegenthaler A, Röösli M . Exposure modeling of high-frequency electromagnetic fields. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2008; 18: 183–191.
Aerts S, Deschrijver D, Verloock L, Dhaene T, Martens L, Joseph W . Assessment of outdoor radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure through hotspot localization using kriging-based sequential sampling. Environ Res 2013; 126: 184–191.
Joseph W, Verloock L, Goeminne F, Vermeeren G, Martens L . In situ LTE exposure of the general public: characterization and extrapolation. Bioelectromagnetics 2012b; 33: 466–475.
Tomitsch J, Dechant E . Exposure to electromagnetic fields in households-Trends from 2006 to 2012: Trends in EMF From 2006 to 2012. Bioelectromagnetics 2015; 36: 77–85.
Verloock L, Joseph W, Vermeeren G, Martens L . Procedure for assessment of general public exposure from WLAN in offices and in wireless sensor network testbed. Health Phys 2010; 98: 628–638.
Beekhuizen J, Kromhout H, Bürgi A, Huss A, Vermeulen R . What input data are needed to accurately model electromagnetic fields from mobile phone base stations. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2015; 25: 53–57.
Beekhuizen J, Vermeulen R, van Eijsden M, van Strien R, Bürgi A, Loomans E et al. Modelling indoor electromagnetic fields (EMF) from mobile phone base stations for epidemiological studies. Environ Int 2014; 67: 22–26.
Breckenkamp J, Blettner M, Schüz J, Bornkessel C, Schmiedel S, Schlehofer B et al. Residential characteristics and radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposures from bedroom measurements in Germany. Radiat Environ Biophys 2012; 51: 85–92.
Urbinello D, Röösli M . Impact of one’s own mobile phone in stand-by mode on personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2013; 23: 545–548.
Estenberg J, Augustsson T . Extensive frequency selective measurements of radiofrequency fields in outdoor environments performed with a novel mobile monitoring system: RF measurements in outdoor environments. Bioelectromagnetics 2014; 35: 227–230.
Bolte JFB, Eikelboom T . Personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurements in the Netherlands: exposure level and variability for everyday activities, times of day and types of area. Environ Int 2012; 48: 133–142.
Thomas S, Kühnlein A, Heinrich S, Praml G, Nowak D, von Kries R et al. Personal exposure to mobile phone frequencies and well-being in adults: a cross-sectional study based on dosimetry. Bioelectromagnetics 2008b; 29: 463–470.
Thomas S, Kühnlein A, Heinrich S, Praml G, von Kries R, Radon K . Exposure to mobile telecommunication networks assessed using personal dosimetry and well-being in children and adolescents: the German MobilEe-study. Environ Health 2008a; 7: 54.
Viel J-F, Cardis E, Moissonnier M, de Seze R, Hours M . Radiofrequency exposure in the French general population: Band, time, location and activity variability. Environ Int 2009; 35: 1150–1154.
Verloock L, Joseph W, Goeminne F, Martens L, Verlaek M, Constandt K . Assessment of radio frequency exposures in schools, homes, and public places in Belgium. Health Phys 2014; 107: 503–513.
Bolte JFB . Lessons learnt on biases and uncertainties in personal exposure measurement surveys of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields with exposimeters. Environ Int 2016; 94: 724–735.
Berg-Beckhoff G, Blettner M, Kowall B, Breckenkamp J, Schlehofer B, Schmiedel S et al. Mobile phone base stations and adverse health effects: phase 2 of a cross-sectional study with measured radio frequency electromagnetic fields. Occup Environ Med 2008; 66: 124–130.
Bürgi A, Scanferla D, Lehmann H . Time averaged transmitter power and exposure to electromagnetic fields from mobile phone base stations. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2014; 11: 8025–8037.
Huang Y, Varsier N, Niksic S, Kocan E, Pejanovic-Djurisic M, Popovic M et al. Comparison of average global exposure of population induced by a macro 3G network in different geographical areas in France and Serbia: average EMF exposure of population. Bioelectromagnetics 2016; 37: 382–390.
Mahfouz Z, Verloock L, Joseph W, Tanghe E, Gati A, Wiart J et al. Comparison of temporal realistic telecommunication base station exposure with worst-case estimation in two countries. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2013; 157: 331–338.
Manassas A, Boursianis A, Samaras T, Sahalos JN . Continuous electromagnetic radiation monitoring in the environment: analysis of the results in Greece. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2012; 151: 437–442.
Acknowledgements
This project was supported by the Swiss Research Foundation for Electricity and Mobile Communication, ETH Zürich, Switzerland, under the contract number B2014-07.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology website
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sagar, S., Dongus, S., Schoeni, A. et al. Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure in everyday microenvironments in Europe: A systematic literature review. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 28, 147–160 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2017.13
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2017.13
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Personal exposure from free Wi-Fi hotspots in downtown Mexico City
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023)
-
Protective Effects of Anthocyanins Extracted from Vaccinium Uliginosum on 661W Cells Against Microwave-Induced Retinal Damage
Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine (2022)
-
Instruments to measure environmental and personal radiofrequency-electromagnetic field exposures: an update
Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine (2022)
-
Protocol for personal RF-EMF exposure measurement studies in 5th generation telecommunication networks
Environmental Health (2021)
-
Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: a critical review of explanatory hypotheses
Environmental Health (2020)