Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Associations among personal care product use patterns and exogenous hormone use in the NIEHS Sister Study

Abstract

It is hypothesized that certain chemicals in personal care products may alter the risk of adverse health outcomes. The primary aim of this study was to use a data-centered approach to classify complex patterns of exposure to personal care products and to understand how these patterns vary according to use of exogenous hormone exposures, oral contraceptives (OCs) and post-menopausal hormone therapy (HT). The NIEHS Sister Study is a prospective cohort study of 50,884 US women. Limiting the sample to non-Hispanic blacks and whites (N=47,019), latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify groups of individuals with similar patterns of personal care product use based on responses to 48 survey questions. Personal care products were categorized into three product types (beauty, hair, and skincare products) and separate latent classes were constructed for each type. Adjusted prevalence differences (PD) were calculated to estimate the association between exogenous hormone use, as measured by ever/never OC or HT use, and patterns of personal care product use. LCA reduced data dimensionality by grouping of individuals with similar patterns of personal care product use into mutually exclusive latent classes (three latent classes for beauty product use, three for hair, and four for skin care. There were strong differences in personal care usage by race, particularly for haircare products. For both blacks and whites, exogenous hormone exposures were associated with higher levels of product use, especially beauty and skincare products. Relative to individual product use questions, latent class variables capture complex patterns of personal care product usage. These patterns differed by race and were associated with ever OC and HT use. Future studies should consider personal care product exposures with other exogenous exposures when modeling health risks.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Environmental Working Group. Exposures add up: survey results [website]. Available: http://www.ewg.org/skindeep/2004/06/15/exposures-add-up-survey-results/ (accessed on 3 April 2014).

  2. Jones J . Can rumors cause cancer? J Nat l Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 1469–1471.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dodson RE . Endocrine disruptors and asthma-associated chemicals in consumer products. Environ Health Perspect 2012; 120: 935–943.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Davis D, Bradlow H, Wolff M, Woodruff T, Hoel D, Anton-Culver H . Medical hypothesis: xenoestrogens as preventable causes of breast cancer. Environ Health Perspect 1993; 101: 372–377.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Colborn T . Developmental effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in wildlife and humans. Environ Health Perspect 1993; 101: 378–384.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Macon MB . Endocrine disruptors and the breast: early life effects and later life disease. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2013; 18: 43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barrett JR . Chemical exposures: the ugly side of beauty products. Environ Health Perspect 2005; 113: A24–A24.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kortenkamp A . Low dose mixture effects of endocrine disrupters: implications for risk assessment and epidemiology. Int J Androl 2008; 31: 233–240.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Silva MJ, Barr DB, Reidy JA, Malek NA, Hodge CC, Caudill SP et al. Urinary levels of seven phthalate metabolites in the U.S. population from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2000. Environ Health Perspect 2004; 112: 331–338.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. World Health Organization. State of the Science of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals2012 An assessment of the state of the science of endocrine disruptors prepared by a group of experts for the United Nations Environment Programme and World Health Organization. Geneva: World Health Organization, United Nations Environment Programm, (cited 2 January 2016).

  11. Carlin DJ, Rider CV, Woychik R, Birnbaum LS . Unraveling the health effects of environmental mixtures: an NIEHS priority. Environ Health Perspect 2013; 121: A6–A8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. NIEHS. (National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences). 2012. 2012–2017 Strategic Plan. Advancing Science, Improving Health: A Plan for Environmental Health Research. Publication No. 12-7935. http://niehs.nih.gov/about/strategicplan/index.cfm (accessed 11 October 2015).

  13. Lanza ST . PROC LCA: a SAS procedure for latent Class analysis. Struct Equ Model 2007; 14: 671–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu X, Bennett DH, Ritz B, Cassady DL, Lee K, Hertz-Picciotto I . Usage pattern of personal care products in California households. Food Chem Toxicol 2010; 48: 3109–3119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dean N, Raftery AE . Latent class analysis variable selection. Ann Inst Stat Math 2010; 62: 11–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bray BC, Lanza ST, Tan Z . An introduction to elminating bias in classify-analyze approaches for latent class analysis. The Methodoogy Center Technical Report N012–N118 2012.

  17. Lanza ST, Savage JS, Birch LL . Identification and omen. Obesity prediction of latent classes of weight-loss strategies among women 2010; 18: 833–840.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Biesterbos JWH, Dudzina T, Delmaar CJE, Bakker MI, Russel FGM, von Goetz N et al. Usage patterns of personal care products: Important factors for exposure assessment. Food Chem Toxicol 2013; 55: 8–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Manová E, von Goetz N, Keller C, Siegrist M, Hungerbühler K . Use patterns of leave-on personal care products among Swiss-German children, adolescents, and adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2013; 10: 2778–2798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fakri S . Antiperspirant use as a risk factor for breast cancer in Iraq. East Mediterr Health J 2006; 12: 478–482.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mirick DK, Davis S, Thomas DB . Antiperspirant use and the risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94: 1578–1580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McGrath KG . An earlier age of breast cancer diagnosis related to more frequent use of antiperspirants/deodorants and underarm shaving. Eur J Cancer Prev 2003; 12: 479–485.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Takkouche B, Etminan M, Montes-Martínez A . Personal use of hair dyes and risk of cancer: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2005; 293: 2516–2525.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lanza ST, Rhoades BL . Latent class analysis: an alternative perspective on subgroup analysis in prevention and treatment. Prev Sci 2013; 14: 157–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Haydon AA, Herring AH, Halpern CT . Associations between patterns of emerging sexual behavior and young adult reproductive health. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2012; 44: 218–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. James-Todd T, Terry MB, Rich-Edwards J, Deierlein A, Senie R . Childhood hair product use and earlier age at menarche in a racially diverse study population: a Pilot study. Ann Epidemiol 2011; 21: 461–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tiwary CM . Premature sexual development in children following the use of estrogen- or placenta-containing hair products. Clin Pediatr 1998; 37: 733–739.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tiwary CM, Ward JA . Use of hair products containing hormone or placenta by US military personnel. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2003; 16: 1025–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Campaign for Safe Cosmetics Campaign for Safe Cosmetics. Chemicals of Concern [website]. (2015). Available.http://www.safecosmetics.org/get-the-facts/chemicals-of-concern/. Accessed 16 March 2015.

  30. EWG. EWG's Skin Deep Cosmetics Database. http://www.ewg.org/skindeep/. Accessed 5 November 2012.

  31. Kessler R . More than cosmetic changes: taking stock of personal care product safety. Environ Health Perspect 2015; 123: A120–A127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyla W Taylor.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taylor, K., Baird, D., Herring, A. et al. Associations among personal care product use patterns and exogenous hormone use in the NIEHS Sister Study. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 27, 458–464 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2016.82

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2016.82

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links