Original Article | Published:

Relationships between arsenic concentrations in drinking water and lung and bladder cancer incidence in U.S. counties

Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology volume 27, pages 235243 (2017) | Download Citation

Abstract

Increased risks of lung and bladder cancer have been observed in populations exposed to high levels of inorganic arsenic. However, studies at lower exposures (i.e., less than 100 μg/l in water) have shown inconsistent results. We therefore conducted an ecological analysis of the association between historical drinking water arsenic concentrations and lung and bladder cancer incidence in U.S. counties. We used drinking water arsenic concentrations measured by the U.S. Geological Survey and state agencies in the 1980s and 1990s as proxies for historical exposures in counties where public groundwater systems and private wells are important sources of drinking water. Relationships between arsenic levels and cancer incidence in 2006–2010 were explored by Poisson regression analyses, adjusted for groundwater dependence and important demographic covariates. The median and 95th percentile county mean arsenic concentrations were 1.5 and 15.4 μg/l, respectively. Water arsenic concentrations were significant and positively associated with female and male bladder cancer, and with female lung cancer. Our findings support an association between low water arsenic concentrations and lung and bladder cancer incidence in the United States. However, the limitations of the ecological study design suggest caution in interpreting these results.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    National Research Council (NRC)Arsenic in Drinking Water. The National Academy Press: Washington, DC. 1999.

  2. 2.

    National Research Council (NRC)Arsenic in Drinking Water: 2001 Update. The National Academy Press: Washington, DC. 2001.

  3. 3.

    International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)A Review of Human Carcinogens. Part C: Arsenic, Metals, Fibres, and Dusts. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. World Health Organization (WHO): Lyon, France. 2012.

  4. 4.

    , , , , . Evaluation of the carcinogenicity of inorganic arsenic. Crit Rev Toxicol 2013; 43: 711–752.

  5. 5.

    , , . Case-control study of bladder cancer and arsenic in drinking water. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 141: 523–530.

  6. 6.

    , , , , . Arsenic concentrations in well water and risk of bladder and kidney cancer in Finland. Environ Health Perspect 1999; 107: 705–710.

  7. 7.

    , , , , . Drinking water arsenic in Utah: a cohort mortality study. Environ Health Perspect 1999; 107: 359–365.

  8. 8.

    , , . Cancer incidence and high environmental arsenic concentrations in rural populations: results of an ecological study. Int J Environ Health Res 1999; 9: 131–141.

  9. 9.

    , , , , , . Lung cancer and arsenic concentrations in drinking water in Chile. Epidemiology 2000; 11: 673–679.

  10. 10.

    , , , , , et al. Utility of recent studies to assess the National Research Council 2001 estimates of cancer risk from ingested arsenic. Environ Health Perspect 2011; 119: 284–290.

  11. 11.

    , , , , , et al. Arsenic in drinking water and risk for cancer in Denmark. Environ Health Perspect 2008; 116: 231–237.

  12. 12.

    , , , . Arsenic levels in ground water and cancer incidence in Idaho: an ecologic study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2009; 82: 843–849.

  13. 13.

    , , , , , et al. Arsenic in drinking water and bladder cancer mortality in the United States: an analysis based on 133 U.S. counties and 30 years of observation. J Occup Environ Med 2004; 46: 298–306.

  14. 14.

    , , , , , . Arsenic concentrations in prediagnostic toenails and the risk of bladder cancer in a cohort study of male smokers. Am J Epidemiol 2004; 160: 853–859.

  15. 15.

    , , , , , et al. Case–control study of bladder cancer and exposure to arsenic in Argentina. Am J Epidemiol 2004; 159: 381–389.

  16. 16.

    , , , , , et al. Incidence of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder and arsenic exposure in New Hampshire. Cancer Causes Control 2004; 15: 465–472.

  17. 17.

    , , , . Case–control study of bladder cancer and drinking water arsenic in the western United States. Am J Epidemiol 2003; 158: 1193–1201.

  18. 18.

    , , , . Arsenic in drinking water and cerebrovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, and kidney disease in Michigan: a standardized mortality ratio analysis. Environ Health 2007; 6: 4.

  19. 19.

    , , , , , et al. Ingested arsenic, cigarette smoking, and lung cancer risk: a follow-up study in arseniasis-endemic areas in Taiwan. JAMA 2004; 292: 2984–2990.

  20. 20.

    , , , , , . Ingested arsenic, characteristics of well water consumption and risk of different histological types of lung cancer in northeastern Taiwan. Environ Res 2010; 110: 455–462.

  21. 21.

    , , , , , et al. Arsenic in drinking water and risk of urinary tract cancer: a follow-up study from northeastern Taiwan. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010; 19: 101–110.

  22. 22.

    , , . Lung cancer and exposure to arsenic in rural Bangladesh. Occup Environ Med 2008; 65: 765–768.

  23. 23.

    , , , , , et al. Lifetime risk of urothelial carcinoma and lung cancer in the arseniasis-endemic area of Northeastern Taiwan. J Asian Earth Sci 2013; 77: 332–337.

  24. 24.

    , , , , , et al. Urinary arsenic profile affects the risk of urothelial carcinoma even at low arsenic exposure. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2007; 218: 99–106.

  25. 25.

    , , , , , et al. Protective Effects of alpha tocopherols on the risk of inorganic arsenic-related urothelial carcinoma. Sci Total Environ 2011; 409: 1039–1045.

  26. 26.

    , , , , , . The effect of cigarette smoke and arsenic exposure on urothelial carcinoma risk is modified by glutathione S-transferance M1 gene null genotype. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2013; 266: 254–259.

  27. 27.

    , , , , , et al. Plasma folate level, urinary arsenic methylation profiles, and urothelial carcinoma susceptibility. Food Chem Toxicol 2008; 46: 929–938.

  28. 28.

    , . Arsenic, internal cancers, and issues in inference from studies of low-level exposures in human populations. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2007; 222: 252–257.

  29. 29.

    , , , , , et al. Lifetime exposure to arsenic in drinking water and bladder cancer: a population-based case–control study in Michigan, USA. Cancer Causes Control 2010; 21: 745–757.

  30. 30.

    U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Data files provided by Neil Dubrovsky, February 25 (personal communication via email to John Cowden, EPA), 2013.

  31. 31.

    . Mapping arsenic in groundwater—a real need, but a hard problem. Geotimes 2001; 46: 34–36.

  32. 32.

    U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). A retrospective analysis on the occurrence of arsenic in ground-water resources of the United States and limitations in drinking-water-supply characterizations. Water-Resources Investigations Report 99–4279. Reston, VA, 2001.

  33. 33.

    , , , . Arsenic in ground water of the United States: occurrence and geochemistry. Ground Water 2000; 38: 589–604.

  34. 34.

    World Health OrganizationInternational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9). World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1977.

  35. 35.

    National Cancer Institute (NCI). State Cancer Profiles, 2014 (cited on 13 August 2014). Available at .

  36. 36.

    Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program (SEER). SEER cancer statistics factsheets: bladder cancer, 2014 (cited on 13 August 2014). Available at .

  37. 37.

    Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program (SEER). County attributes, 2013 (cited on 13 August 2014). Available at .

  38. 38.

    , , , , , et al. Combining information from two surveys to estimate county-level prevalence rates of cancer risk factors and screening. J Amer Stat Assoc 2007; 102: 474–486.

  39. 39.

    CDC (Centers for Disease Control). 2014 Diabetes Data and Trends, (cited on 13 August 2014). Available at .

  40. 40.

    U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Estimated Use of Water in the United States County-level Data for 2005, 2013 (cited on 30 January 2013). Available at .

  41. 41.

    , , , . Socioeconomic, rural-urban, and racial inequalities in US cancer mortality: Part I — All cancers and lung cancer and Part II — colorectal, prostate, breast, and cervical cancers. J Cancer Epidemiol 2011; 2011: 107497.

  42. 42.

    , , , , , et al. Urban-rural differences in male cancer incidence and mortality in the Umbria region of Italy. Italian J Public Health 2007; 4: 149–153.

  43. 43.

    Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). Area Health Resource Files, 2013 (cited on 13 August 2014). Available at: .

  44. 44.

    , . Difficulties with regression analyses of age-adjusted rates. Biometrics 1984; 40: 437–443.

  45. 45.

    U.S. Census BureauA Compass for Understanding and Using American Community Survey Data: What Researchers Need to Know. U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration: Washington, DC. 2009.

  46. 46.

    . Age adjustment in ecological studies: using a study on arsenic ingestion and bladder cancer as an example. BMC Public Health 2011; 11: 820.

  47. 47.

    . Estimating the Dimension of a Model. Ann Statistics 1978; 6: 461–464.

  48. 48.

    Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program (SEER). SEER Cancer Statistics Factsheets: Lung and Bronchus Cancer, 2014 (cited on 13 August 2014). Available at .]

  49. 49.

    , . Generalized Linear Models, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall: London. 1989.

  50. 50.

    The R Foundation for Statistical Computing. R Computing Environment, Version 3.0.2, 2013 (cited on 13 August 2014). Available at .

  51. 51.

    , , Car Package Version 2.0-19, 2014 (cited on 13 August 2014). Available at .

  52. 52.

    . Applied Regression Analysis and Generalized Linear Models, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications: Los Angeles. 2008.

  53. 53.

    , . An R Companion to Applied Regression, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA. 2011.

  54. 54.

    , , . Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology 2009; 20: 488–495.

  55. 55.

    , , , , , et al. Urinary arsenic profiles and the risks of cancer mortality: a popu-lation-based 20-year follow-up study in arseniasis-endemic areas in Taiwan. Environ Res 2013; 122: 25–30.

  56. 56.

    , , , , , et al. Drinking water arsenic in northern Chile: high cancer risks 40 years after exposure cessation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 2013; 22: 623–630.

  57. 57.

    , . Ecological studies: biases, misconceptions, and counterexamples. Am J Epidemiol 1994; 139: 747–759.

  58. 58.

    . Linkage failures in ecological studies. World Health Stat Q 1995; 48: 78–84.

  59. 59.

    , , . The temporal stability of arsenic concentrations in well water in western Nevada. Environ Res 2005; 99: 164–168.

  60. 60.

    , , , , . Probabilistic Modeling of Dietary Arsenic Exposure and Dose and Evaluation with 2003–2004 NHANES Data. Environ Health Perspect 2010; 118: 345–350.

  61. 61.

    , , , , , et al. Estimation of multimedia inorganic arsenic intake in the U.S. population. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 2002; 8: 1697–1721.

  62. 62.

    U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Guidelines for Preparation of State Water-use Estimates for 2000, 2004 (cited on 13 August 2014). Available at .

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Tim Wade and Elizabeth Doyle of EPA, and Prof. Dale Hattis of Clark University for their helpful comments on drafts of this manuscript. This worked was funded in part under U.S. EPA Contract EP-C-09-009.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. ICF International, Fairfax, Virginia, USA

    • William M Mendez Jr.
    • , Sorina Eftim
    •  & Isaac Warren
  2. ICF International, Rohnert Park, California, USA

    • Jonathan Cohen
  3. National Center for Computational Toxicology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA

    • John Cowden
  4. National Center for Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA

    • Janice S Lee
    •  & Reeder Sams

Authors

  1. Search for William M Mendez in:

  2. Search for Sorina Eftim in:

  3. Search for Jonathan Cohen in:

  4. Search for Isaac Warren in:

  5. Search for John Cowden in:

  6. Search for Janice S Lee in:

  7. Search for Reeder Sams in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William M Mendez Jr.

Supplementary information

Word documents

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Material

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2016.58

Disclaimer

The study was reviewed by the National Center for Environmental Assessment of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Views expressed in this article are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect the US EPA’s views or policies. All analyses are based on public release files from U.S National Cancer Institute (NCI) State Cancer Profiles website; thus, informed consent requirements have been met.

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology website (http://www.nature.com/jes)