Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Size- and type-specific exposure assessment of an asbestos products factory in China

Abstract

This study describes fibre size and type-specific airborne asbestos exposures in an asbestos product factory. Forty-four membrane filter samples were analysed by scanning electron microscopy to determine the size distribution of asbestos fibres, by workshop. Fibre frequencies of bivariate (length by width) categories were calculated and differences between workshops were tested by analysis of variance. Data were recorded for 13 435 chrysotile and 1075 tremolite fibres. The proportions between size metrics traditionally measured and potentially biologically important size metrics were found to vary in this study from proportions reported in other cohort studies. One, common size distribution was generated for each asbestos type over the entire factory because statistically significant differences in frequency between workshops were not detected. This study provides new information on asbestos fibre size and type distributions in an asbestos factory. The extent to which biologically relevant fibre size indices were captured or overlooked between studies can potentially reconcile currently unexplained differences in asbestos-related disease (ARD) risk between cohorts. The fibre distributions presented here, when combined with similar data from other sites, will contribute to the development of quantitative models for predicting risk and our understanding of the effects of fibre characteristics in the development of ARD.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Arsenic, metals, fibres, and dusts. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 2012; 100 (Pt C): 11–465.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Berman DW . Apples to apples: the origin and magnitude of differences in asbestos cancer risk estimates derived using varying protocols. Risk Anal 2011; 31 (8): 1308–1326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berman DW, Crump KS Final draft: technical support document for a protocol to assess asbestos-related risk. Appendix B: Report on the Peer Consultation Workshop to Discuss a Proposed Protocol to Assess Asbestos-Related Risk. US EPA: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response: : Washington, DC, USA. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stayner LT, Dankovic DA, Lemen RA . Occupational exposure to chrysotile asbestos and cancer risk: a review of the amphibole hypothesis. Am J Public Health 1996; 86 (2): 179–186.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Berman DW, Crump KS . Update of potency factors for asbestos-related lung cancer and mesothelioma. Crit Rev Toxicol 2008; 38 (Suppl 1): 1–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Berman DW, Crump KS . A meta-analysis of asbestos-related cancer risk that addresses fiber size and mineral type. Crit Rev Toxicol 2008; 38 (Suppl 1): 49–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hodgson JT, Darnton A . The quantitative risks of mesothelioma and lung cancer in relation to asbestos exposure. Ann Occup Hyg 2000; 44 (8): 565–601.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stanton MF, Layard M, Tegeris A, Miller E, May M, Morgan E et al. Relation of particle dimension to carcinogenicity in amphibole asbestoses and other fibrous minerals. J Natl Cancer Inst 1981; 67 (5): 965–975.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pott F, Huth F, Friedrichs KH . Tumorigenic effect of fibrous dust in experimental animals. Environ Health Perspect 1974; 9: 313–315.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lippmann M . Asbestos exposure indices. Environ Res 1988; 46 (1): 86–106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Berman DW, Crump KS . Final Draft: Technical Support Document for a Protocol to Assess Asbestos-Related Risk. US EPA: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response: : Washington, DC, USA. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Berman DW, Crump KS, Chatfield EJ, Davis JM, Jones AD . The sizes, shapes, and mineralogy of asbestos structures that induce lung tumors or mesothelioma in AF/HAN rats following inhalation. Risk Anal 1995; 15 (2): 181–195.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. NIOSH. Method 7400: Asbestos and Other Fibres by PCM. 1994. Available at http://earth2geologists.net/Microscopes/documents/Asbestos_Counting_Methodology_PCM_NIOSH7400.pdf. (Accessed 7 September 2010).

  14. NIOSH. Method 7402: Asbestos by TEM. 1994. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2003-154/pdfs/7402.pdf. (Accessed 7 September 2010).

  15. Nicholson WJ . Airborne Asbestos Health Assessment Update. Report Number: 600/884003F. US EPA: : Washington, DC. 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hwang CY . Size and shape of airborne asbestos fibres in mines and mills. Br J Ind Med 1983; 40 (3): 273–279.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Dement JM, Wallingford KM . Comparison of phase contrast and electron microscopic methods for evaluation of occupational asbestos exposures. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 1990; 5 (4): 242–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Berman DW . Comparing milled fiber, Quebec ore, and textile factory dust: has another piece of the asbestos puzzle fallen into place? Crit Rev Toxicol 2010; 40 (2): 151–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hwang CY, Gibbs GW . The dimensions of airborne asbestos fibres—I. Crocidolite from Kuruman area, Cape Province, South Africa. Ann Occup Hyg 1981; 24 (1): 23–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hein MJ, Stayner LT, Lehman E, Dement JM . Follow-up study of chrysotile textile workers: cohort mortality and exposure-response. Occup Environ Med 2007; 64 (9): 616–625.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stayner L, Kuempel E, Gilbert S, Hein M, Dement J . An epidemiological study of the role of chrysotile asbestos fibre dimensions in determining respiratory disease risk in exposed workers. Occup Environ Med 2008; 65 (9): 613–619.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Loomis D, Dement J, Richardson D, Wolf S . Asbestos fibre dimensions and lung cancer mortality among workers exposed to chrysotile. Occup Environ Med 2010; 67 (9): 580–584.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dement JM, Loomis D, Richardson D, Wolf SH, Kuempel ED . Estimates of historical exposures by phase contrast and transmission electron microscopy for pooled exposure–response analyses of North Carolina and South Carolina, USA asbestos textile cohorts. Occup Environ Med 2011; 68 (8): 593–598.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dement JM, Stayner LT . Letter to the editor: “Comparing milled fiber, Quebec ore, and textile factory dust: has another piece of the asbestos puzzle fallen into place?” by D. Wayne Berman. Crit Rev Toxicol 2010; 40 (8): 749–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Berman DW . Reply to letter to the editor: “Comparing milled fiber, Quebec ore, and textile factory dust: has another piece of the asbestos puzzle fallen into place?” by D. Wayne Berman. Crit Rev Toxicol 2010; 40 (8): 752–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dement JM, Brown DP, Okun A . Follow-up study of chrysotile asbestos textile workers: cohort mortality and case-control analyses. Am J Ind Med 1994; 26 (4): 431–447.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sebastien P, McDonald JC, McDonald AD, Case B, Harley R . Respiratory cancer in chrysotile textile and mining industries: exposure inferences from lung analysis. Br J Ind Med 1989; 46 (3): 180–187.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Liddell FDK, McDonald AD, McDonald JC . The 1891-1920 birth cohort of Quebec chrysotile miners and millers: development from 1904 and mortality to 1992. Ann Occup Hyg 1997; 41 (1): 13–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dement JM, Kuempel ED, Zumwalde RD, Smith RJ, Stayner LT, Loomis D . Development of a fibre size-specific job-exposure matrix for airborne asbestos fibres. Occup Environ Med 2008; 65 (9): 605–612.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Loomis D, Dement JM, Elliott L, Richardson D, Kuempel ED, Stayner L . Increased lung cancer mortality among chrysotile asbestos textile workers is more strongly associated with exposure to long thin fibres. Occup Environ Med 2012; 69 (8): 564–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Japan Standards Association (JSA). Determination of airborne fibrous particles - part 1: optical microscopy method and scanning electron microscopy method. JIS K 2006, 3850–3851.

  32. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Ambient air - determination of numerical concentration of inorganic fibrous particles - scanning electron microscopy method. ISO 2002 14966.

  33. Berman DW, Brorby GP, Sheehan PJ, Bogen KT, Holm SE . More on the dynamics of dust generation: the effects of mixing and sanding chrysotile, calcium carbonate, and other components on the characteristics of joint-compound dusts. Ann Occup Hyg 2012; 56 (7): 852–867.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Quinn MM, Smith TJ, Eisen EA, Wegman DH, Ellenbecker MJ . Implications of different fiber measures for epidemiologic studies of man-made vitreous fibers. Am J Ind Med 2000; 38 (2): 132–139.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. SPSS Inc. SPSS Version 16.0 for Windows.

  36. Yano E, Wang Z, Wang X, Wang M, Lan Y . Cancer mortality among workers exposed to amphibole-free chrysotile asbestos. Am J Epidemiol 2001; 154 (6): 538–543.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Williams-Jones AE, Normand C, Clark JR, Vali H, Martin RF Controls of amphibole formation in chrysotile deposits: evidence from the Jeffrey Mine, Asbestos, Quebec. In: Nolan RP, Langer AM, Ross M et al (eds). The Health Effects of Chrysotile Asbestos: Contribution of Science to Risk-Management Decisions. Canadian Mineralogist Special Publication, 5th edn, Mineralogical Association of Canada: : Quebec, Canada. 2001, pp 89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wang X, Yano E, Qiu H, Yu I, Courtice MN, Tse LA et al. A 37-year observation of mortality in Chinese chrysotile asbestos workers. Thorax 2012; 67 (2): 106–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lin S, Wang X, Yu IT, Yano E, Courtice M, Qiu H et al. Cause-specific mortality in relation to chrysotile-asbestos exposure in a Chinese cohort. J Thorac Oncol 2012; 7 (7): 1109–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. JEOL USA. JSM-6390 Scanning Electron Microscope Specifications.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge contributions from Mr Yoshihito Konishi of F&A Technology Institute, Tokyo, Japan, and Mr Saikatsu and Mr Kojima of the Nisshin Kankyo Center, Tokyo, Japan. Funding to undertake this research was provided by The Global Scholarship Programme for Research Excellence — CNOOC Grants for 2010–2011, Chinese University of Hong Kong.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eiji Yano.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

D Wayne Berman conducts work for a variety of public and private clients with competing interests in asbestos. None of them was in any way involved in this work.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Courtice, M., Berman, D., Yano, E. et al. Size- and type-specific exposure assessment of an asbestos products factory in China. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 26, 63–69 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2015.46

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2015.46

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links