Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Impact of one’s own mobile phone in stand-by mode on personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure

Abstract

When moving around, mobile phones in stand-by mode periodically send data about their positions. The aim of this paper is to evaluate how personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) measurements are affected by such location updates. Exposure from a mobile phone handset (uplink) was measured during commuting by using a randomized cross-over study with three different scenarios: disabled mobile phone (reference), an activated dual-band phone and a quad-band phone. In the reference scenario, uplink exposure was highest during train rides (1.19 mW/m2) and lowest during car rides in rural areas (0.001 mW/m2). In public transports, the impact of one’s own mobile phone on personal RF-EMF measurements was not observable because of high background uplink radiation from other people’s mobile phone. In a car, uplink exposure with an activated phone was orders of magnitude higher compared with the reference scenario. This study demonstrates that personal RF-EMF exposure is affected by one’s own mobile phone in stand-by mode because of its regular location update. Further dosimetric studies should quantify the contribution of location updates to the total RF-EMF exposure in order to clarify whether the duration of mobile phone use, the most common exposure surrogate in the epidemiological RF-EMF research, is actually an adequate exposure proxy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Röösli M, Frei P, Bolte J, Neubauer G, Cardis E, Feychting M et al Conduct of a personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurement study: proposed study protocol. Environ Health 2010; 9 (1): 23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Viel JF, Cardis E, Moissonnier M, de Seze R, Hours M . Radiofrequency exposure in the French general population: band, time, location and activity variability. Environ Int 2009; 35 (8): 1150–1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bolte JF, van der Zande G, Kamer J . Calibration and uncertainties in personal exposure measurements of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics 2011; 32 (8): 652–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Thuróczy G, Molnar F, Jánossy G, Nagy N, Kubinyi G, Bakos J et al Personal RF exposimetry in urban area. Ann Telecommun 2008; 63 (1-2): 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Joseph W, Vermeeren G, Verloock L, Heredia MM, Martens L . Characterization of personal RF electromagnetic field exposure and actual absorption for the general public. Health Phys 2008; 95 (3): 317–330.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Frei P, Mohler E, Bürgi A, Fröhlich J, Neubauer G, Braun-Fahrländer C et al Classification of personal exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) for epidemiological research: Evaluation of different exposure assessment methods. Environ Int 2010; 36 (7): 714–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin YB, Lee PC, Chlamtac I . Dynamic periodic location update in mobile networks. IEEE Trans Vehicular Technol 2002; 51: 615–624.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Joseph W, Frei P, Röösli M, Thuróczy G, Gajsek P, Trcek T et al Comparison of personal radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure in different urban areas across Europe. Environ Res 2010; 110 (7): 658–663.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Frei P, Mohler E, Neubauer G, Theis G, Bürgi A, Fröhlich J et al Temporal and spatial variability of personal exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields. Environ Res 2009; 109 (6): 779–785.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Röösli M, Frei P, Mohler E, Braun-Fahrländer C, Bürgi A, Fröhlich J et al Statistical analysis of personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurements with nondetects. Bioelectromagnetics 2008; 29 (6): 471–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vrijheid M, Mann S, Vecchia P, Wiart J, Taki M, Ardoino L et al Determinants of mobile phone output power in a multinational study: implications for exposure assessment. Occup Environ Med 2009; 66 (10): 664–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cooke R, Laing S, Swerdlow AJ . A case–control study of risk of leukaemia in relation to mobile phone use. Br J Cancer 2010; 103 (11): 1729–1735.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Divan HA, Kheifets L, Obel C, Olsen J . Prenatal and postnatal exposure to cell phone use and behavioral problems in children. Epidemiology 2008; 19 (4): 523–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vrijheid M, Martinez D, Forns J, Guxens M, Julvez J, Ferrer M et al Prenatal exposure to cell phone use and neurodevelopment at 14 months. Epidemiology 2010; 21 (2): 259–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Baumann J, Landstorfer FM, Geisbusch L, Georg R . Evaluation of radiation exposure by UMTS mobile phones. Electron Lett 2006; 42 (4): 225–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Röösli.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Urbinello, D., Röösli, M. Impact of one’s own mobile phone in stand-by mode on personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 23, 545–548 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2012.97

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2012.97

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links