Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review
  • Published:

Review of research on residential mobility during pregnancy: consequences for assessment of prenatal environmental exposures

Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology volume 22, pages 429–438 (2012)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Studies on environmental exposures during pregnancy often have limited residential history (e.g., at delivery), potentially introducing exposure misclassification. We reviewed studies reporting residential mobility during pregnancy to summarize current evidence and discuss research implications. A meaningful quantitative combination of results (e.g., meta-analysis), was infeasible owing to variation in study designs. Fourteen studies were identified, of which half were from the US. Most were case-control studies examining birth defects. Residential history was typically assessed after delivery. Overall mobility rates were 9–32% and highest in the second trimester. Mobility generally declined with age, parity, and socioeconomic status, although not consistently. Married mothers moved less frequently. Findings were dissimilar by race, smoking, or alcohol use. On the basis of the few studies reporting distance moved, most distances were short (median often <10 km). Results indicate potential misclassification for environmental exposures estimated with incomplete residential information. This misclassification could be associated with potential confounders, such as socioeconomics, thereby affecting risk estimates. As most moves were short distances, exposures that are homogenous within a community may be well estimated with limited residential data. Future research should consider the implications of residential mobility during pregnancy in relation to the exposure's spatial heterogeneity and factors associated with the likelihood of moving and distance moved.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bell M.L., Ebisu K., and Belanger K. Ambient air pollution and low birth weight in Connecticut and Massachusetts. Environ Health Perspect 2007: 115: 1118–1125.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Parker J.D., Woodruff T.J., Basu R., and Schoendorf K.C. Air pollution and birth weight among term infants in California. Pediatrics 2005: 115: 121–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ritz B., Wilhelm M., Hoggatt K.J., and Ghosh J.K. Ambient air pollution and preterm birth in the environment and pregnancy outcomes study at the University of California, Los Angeles. Am J Epidemiol 2007: 166: 1045–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Miyake Y., Tanaka K., Fujiwara H., Mitani Y., Ikemi H., and Sasaki S., et al. Residential proximity to main roads during pregnancy and the risk of allergic disorders in Japanese infants: the Osaka Maternal and Child Health Study. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2010: 21: 22–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Green R.S., Malig B., Windham G.C., Fenster L., Ostro B., and Swan S. Residential exposure to traffic and spontaneous abortion. Environ Health Perspect 2009: 117: 1939–1944.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. van den Hooven E.H., Jaddoe V.W., de Kluizenaar Y., Hofman A., Mackenbach J.P., and Steegers E.A., et al. Residential traffic exposure and pregnancy-related outcomes: a prospective birth cohort study. Environ Health 2009: 8: 59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nieuwenhuijsen M.J., Toledano M.B., Bennett J., Best N., Hambly P., and de Hoogh C., et al. Chlorination disinfection by-products and risk of congenital anomalies in England and Wales. Environ Health Perspect 2008: 116: 216–222.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Waller K., Swan S.H., DeLorenze G., and Hopkins B. Trihalomethanes in drinking water and spontaneous abortion. Epidemiology 1998: 9: 134–140.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoffman C., Mendola P., Savitz D.A., Herring A.H., Loomis D., and Hartmann K.E., et al. Drinking water disinfection by-product exposure and fetal growth. Epidemiology 2008: 19: 729–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kramer M.D., Lynch C.F., Isacson P., and Hanson J.W. The association of waterborne chloroform with intrauterine growth retardation. Epidemiology 1992: 3: 407–413.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Petit C., Chevrier C., Durand G., Monfort C., Rouget F., and Garlantezec R., et al. Impact on fetal growth of prenatal exposure to pesticides due to agricultural activities: a prospective cohort study in Brittany, France. Environ Health 2010: 9: 71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Reynolds P., Von Behren J., Gunier R.B., Goldberg D.E., Harnly M., and Hertz A. Agricultural pesticide use and childhood cancer in California. Epidemiology 2005: 16: 93–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bell E., Hertz-Picciotto I., and Beaumont J.J. A case-control study of pesticides and fetal death due to congenital anomalies. Epidemiology 2001: 12: 148–156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Roberts E.M., English P.B., Grether J.K., Windham G.C., Somberg L., and Wolff C. Maternal residence near agricultural pesticide application and autism spectrum disorders among children in the California Central Valley. Environ Health Perspect 2007: 115: 1482–1489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Elliott P., Toledano M.B., Bennett J., Beale L., de Hoogh K., and Best N., et al. Mobile phone base stations and early childhood cancers: case-control study. Br Med J 2010: 340: c3077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang S.I., Lee L.T., Zou M.L., Fan C.W., and Yaung C.L. Pregnancy outcome of women in the vicinity of nuclear power plants in Taiwan. Radiat Environ Biophys 2010: 49: 57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mueller B., Kuehn C., Shapiro-Mendoza C., and Tomashek K.M. Fetal deaths and proximity to hazardous waste sites in Washington State. Environ Health Perspect 2007: 115: 776–780.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Blaasaas K.G., Tynes T., and Lie R.T. Residence near power lines and the risk of birth defects. Epidemiology 2003: 14: 95–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bentham G. Migration and morbidity: implications for geographical studies of disease. Soc Sci Med 1988: 26: 49–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Peng R.D., and Bell M.L. Spatial misalignment in time series studies of air pollution and health data. Biostatistics 2010: 11: 720–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Oishi S., and Schimmack U. Residential mobility, well-being, and mortality. J Pers Soc Psychol 2010: 98: 980–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tulloch A.D., Fearon P., Fahy T., and David A. Residential mobility among individuals with severe mental illness: cohort study of UK700 participants. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2010: 45: 767–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Urayama K., Von Behren J., Reynolds P., Hertz A., Does M., and Buffler P.A. Factors associated with residential mobility in children with leukemia: implications for assigning exposures. Ann Epidemiol 2009: 19: 834–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jelleyman T., and Spencer N. Residential mobility in childhood and health outcomes: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health 2008: 62: 584–592.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Michielin F., and Mulder C.H. Family events and the residential mobility of couples. Environ Planning A 2008: 40: 2770–2790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Canfield M.A., Ramadhani T.A., Langlois P.H., and Waller D.K. Residential mobility patterns and exposure misclassification in epidemiologic studies of birth defects. J Exp Sci Environ Epidemiol 2006: 16: 538–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen L., Bell E.M., Caton A.R., Druschel C.M., and Lin S. Residential mobility during pregnancy and the potential for ambient air pollution exposure misclassification. Environ Res 2010: 110: 162–168.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lupo P.J., Symanski E., Chan W., Mitchell L.E., Waller D.K., and Canfield M.A., et al. Differences in exposure assignment between conception and delivery: the impact of maternal mobility. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2010: 24: 200–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Miller A., Siffel C., and Correa A. Residential mobility during pregnancy: patterns and correlates. Matern Child Health J 2010: 14: 625–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shaw G.M., and Malcoe L.H. Residential mobility during pregnancy for mothers of infants with or without congenital cardiac anomalies: a reprint. Arch Environ Health 1992: 47: 236–238.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fell D.B., Dodds L., and King W.D. Residential mobility during pregnancy. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2004: 18: 408–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hodgson S., Shirley M., Bythell M., and Rankin J. Residential mobility during pregnancy in the north of England. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2009 doi:10.1186/1471–2393–9–52.

  33. Khoury M.J., Stewart W., Weinstein A., Panny S., Lindsay P., and Eibenberg M., Weinstein A., et al. Corrigendum. J Clin Epidemiol 1988a: 41: 617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Khoury M.J., Stewart W., Weinstein A., Panny S., Lindsay P., and Eisenberg M. Residential mobility during pregnancy: implications for environmental teratogenesis. J Clin Epidemiol 1988b: 41: 15–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Tunstall H., Pickett K., and Johnsen S. Residential mobility in the UK during pregnancy and infancy: are pregnant women, new mothers and infants “unhealthy migrants”? Soc Sci Med 2010: 71: 786–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Raynes-Greenow C.H., Nassar N., and Roberts C.L. Residential mobility in a cohort of primiparous women during pregnancy and post-partum. Aust N Z J Pub Health 2008: 32: 131–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zender R., Bachand A.M., and Reif J.S. Exposure to tap water during pregnancy. J Exp Anal Environ Epidemiol 2001: 11: 224–230.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Madsen C., Gehring U., Walker S.E., Brunekreef B., Stigum H., and Naess O., et al. Ambient air pollution exposure, residential mobility and term birth weight in Oslo, Norway. Environ Res 2010: 110: 363–371.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Pearce A., Elliman D., Bedford H., and Law C. Residential mobility and uptake of childhood immunisations: findings from the UK Millenium Cohort Study. Vaccine 2008: 26: 1675–1680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lu N., Samuels M.E., and Wilson R. Socioeconomic differences in health: How much do health behaviors and health insurance coverage account for? J Health Care Poor Underserved 2004: 15: 618–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ross C.E., and Mirowsky J. Does medical insurance contribute to socioeconomic differentials in health? Milibank Q 2000: 78: 291–321.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Schulman J., Selvin S., Shaw G.M., and Malcoe L.H. Exposure misclassification due to residential mobility during pregnancy in epidemiologic investigations of congenital malformations. Arch Environ Health 1993: 48: 114–119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Bell M.L., Dominici F., Ebisu K., Zeger S.L., and Samet J.M. Spatial and temporal variation in PM2.5 chemical composition in the United States for health effects studies. Environ Health Perspect 2007: 115: 989–995.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Bravo M.A., and Bell M.L. Spatial heterogeneity of PM10 and O3 in São Paulo, Brazil and implications for human health studies. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 2011: 61: 69–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Chattopadhyay A., White M.J., and Debpuur C. Migrant fertility in Ghana: selection versus adaptation and disruption as causal mechanism. Popul Studies 2006: 60: 189–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Goldstein A., White M., and Goldstein S. Migration, fertility, and state policy in Hubei Province, China. Demography 1997: 34: 481–491.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by funding from the NIEHS (R01ES016317, R01ES015028, and R01ES019587).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Yale University, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, New Haven, Connecticut, USA

    Michelle L Bell

  2. Yale University, School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA

    Kathleen Belanger

Authors
  1. Michelle L Bell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kathleen Belanger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle L Bell.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bell, M., Belanger, K. Review of research on residential mobility during pregnancy: consequences for assessment of prenatal environmental exposures. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 22, 429–438 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2012.42

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2012.42

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links