Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

In vitro antibacterial activity of MGDG-palmitoyl from Oscillatoria acuminata NTAPC05 against extended-spectrum β-lactamase producers


Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria pose a big challenge in clinical practices, warranting a new therapeutic strategy. In this study, methanol extract of the marine cyanobacterium Oscillatoria acuminata NTAPC05 was fractionated under bioassay guidance and the fractions were tested against three well-characterized ESBL-producing bacteria Escherichia coli U655, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia B929 and Enterobacter asburiae B938. Out of the four HPLC fractions, fraction 2 showed bactericidal activity against all the three ESBL producers much more efficiently (MIC 100 μg ml−1) than the fourth-generation cephalosporin (MIC >125 μg ml−1). The active fraction was subjected to time-kill test at concentrations of 1/2 × MIC, 1 × MIC and 2 × MIC, and the results substantiated the bactericidal property of the fraction against the ESBL producers. Spectral analysis revealed monogalactosyldiacylglycerol containing a palmitoyl (MGDG-palmitoyl), being reported for the first time, as the active fraction, and its bactericidal property against ESBL producers was determined. The active fraction appears to damage the bacterial membrane leading to lysis of the cell, as revealed in confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) analysis, that was confirmed in scanning electron microscopic analysis. Cytotoxicity assay revealed the O. acuminata compound to be safe to a normal cell line HEK293 (human embryonic kidney cell). The in silico analysis of MGDG-palmitoyl revealed two successive H-bonding interactions with Leu198 of TEM1 β-lactamase. Taken together, the MGDG-palmitoyl from O. acuminata NTAPC05 offers potential to develop analogs as a therapeutic for bacteremia caused by ESBL producers.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6


  1. 1

    Bradford, P. A. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases in the 21st century: characterization, epidemiology, and detection of this important resistance threat. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 14, 933–951 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Rishi, H. P. D. & John, C. ESBLs: a clear and present danger. Critical Care Res. Pract. 2012, 625170 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Sanders, C. C. Chromosomal cephalosporinases responsible for multiple resistances to newer beta-lactam antibiotics. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 41, 573–593 (1987).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Paterson, D. L. & Bonomo, R. A. Extended-spectrum b-lactamases: a clinical update. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 18, 657–686 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Bonnet, R. Growing group of extended-spectrum b-lactamases: the CTX-M enzymes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48, 1–14 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Albertini, M. T. et al. Surveillance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Enterobacteriaceae producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBLE) in Northern France: a five-year multicentre incidence study. J. Hosp. Infect. 52, 107–113 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Teng, C. P., Chen, H. H., Chan, J. & Lye, D. C. Ertapenem for the treatment of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative bacterial infections. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 30, 356–359 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Rasheed, M. U., Thajuddin, N., Ahamed, P., Teklemariam, Z. & Jamil, K. Antimicrobial drug resistance in strains of Escherichia coli isolated from food sources. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. São Paulo 56, 341–346 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Tandeau-de-Marsac, H. J. Adaptation of cyanobacteria to environmental stimuli: new steps towards molecular mechanisms. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 104, 119–190 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Mayer, A. M. S. & Hamann, M. T. Marine pharmacology in 2001–2002: marine compounds with anti helmintic, antibacterial, anticoagulant, anti diabetic, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, anti malarial, anti platelet, antiprotozoal, anti tuberculosis, and antiviral activities, affecting the cardiovascular, immune and nervous systems and other miscellaneous mechanisms of action. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C 140, 265–286 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Moreau, J. D., Pasando, P., Bernand, P., Caram, B. & Pinnat, J. C. Seasonal variation in the production of antifungal substrates by dictyotales (brown algae) from the French Mediterranean coast. Hydobiologia 2, 1097–1132 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Renu, A. Antibacterial activities of freshwater algae Chlorella ellipsoidea. J. Basic Appl. Biol. 4, 22–26 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Abed, R. M. M. et al. Cyanobacterial diversity and bioactivity of inland hyper saline microbial mats from a desert stream in the Sultanate of Oman. Fottea 11, 215–224 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Rama murthy, V., Raveendran, S., Thirumeni, S. & Krishnaveni, S. Antimicrobial activity of heterocytic cyanobacteria. Int. J. Adv. Lif. Sci. 1, 32–39 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    CLSI Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: 22nd Informational Supplement M100-S22, (Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute, Wayne, PA, (2012).

  16. 16

    Desikachary, T. V. Cyanophyta, (ICAR Publication, New Delhi, (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Smoker, J. A. & Barnum, S. R. Rapid small scale DNA isolation from filamentous cyanobacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Let. 56, 119–122 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Tamura, K. et al. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2731–2739 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Cheesbrough, M. inMedical Laboratory Manual for Tropical Countries Vol. 2, 2–392 (Tropical Health Technology Publications and Butterworth–Heinemann, Cambridge, UK, (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Wikler, M. A. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Eighteenth Informational Supplement; M100-S18. C.L.S.I. (Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute), Pennsylvania, PA, USA 28, 46–52 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Weigand., I., Hilpert, R. & Hancock, R. E. W. Agar and broth dilution methods to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antimicrobial substance. Nat. Protoc. 3, 163–175 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Eliopoulos, G. M. & Moellering, R. C. inAntibiotics in Laboratory Medicine 4thedn(ed.Lorain V) 330–396 The Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, USA, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Denizot, F. & Lang, R. Rapid colorimetric assay for cell growth and survival: modifications to the tetrazolium dye procedure giving improved sensitivity and reliability. J. Immunol. Methods 89, 271–277 (1986).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Ahmad, S. & Yadava, J. N. S. Rapid detection of b-lactam antibiotic resistance among clinical isolates of Escherichia coli. India Vet. Med. J. 3, 256–259 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Morris, G. M. et al. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J. Comput. Chem. 30, 2785–2791 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Payne, D. J. Desperately seeking new antibiotics. Science 321, 1644–1645 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Lipsitch, M., Bergstrom, C. T. & Levin, B. R. The epidemiology resistance in hospital; Paradoxes and prescription. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 1938–1943 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Pitout, J. D., Hanson, N. D. & Church, D. L. Population-based laboratory surveillance for Escherichia coli producing extended spectrum beta lactamases: Importance of community isolates with blaCTX-M genes. Clin. Infect. Dis. 38, 1736–1741 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Sanders, C. C. & Sanders, W. E. β-Lactamase resistance in Gram-negative bacteria: global trends and clinical impact. Clin. Infect. Dis. 15, 824–839 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Kerby, N. N. & Rowell, P. inPhotosynthetic Prokaryotes (eds Mann, N H & Car,N.G.) 233–254 (Plenum Press, New York, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Gupta, A. B. & Shrivastava, G. C. On antibiotic properties of some fresh water algae. Hydrobiologia 25, 285–288 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Schlegel, I., Doan, N. T., Chazal, N. & Smith, G. D. Antibiotic activity of new cyanobacterial isolates from Australia and Asia against green algae and cyanobacteria. J. Appl. Phycol. 10, 471–479 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Harriman, A. (Photo) isomerization dynamics of merocyanine dyes in solution. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 65, 79–93 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Holzl, G. & Dormann, P. Structure and function of glycoglycerolipids in plants and bacteria. Prog. Lipid Res. 46, 225–243 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Heinz, E. & Roughan, P. G. Similarities and differences in lipid metabolism of chloroplasts isolated from 18:3 and 16:3 plants. Plant Physiol. 72, 273–279 (1983).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Dormann, P. & Benning, C. Galactolipids rule in seed plants. Trends Plant Sci. 7, 112–118 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Shirahashi, H. et al. Isolation and identification of anti-tumor-promoting principles from the fresh-water cyanobacterium Phormidium tenue. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 41, 1664–1666 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Morimoto, T. et al. Antitumor promoting glycerol-glycolipids from the green alga Chlorella vulgaris. Phytochemistry 40, 1433–1437 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Frentzen, M., Weier, D. & Feussner, I. Reports on symposia and congresses. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 105, 784–792 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Vered, R. et al. New acylated sulfoglycolipids and digalactolipids and related known glycolipids from cyanobacteria with a potential to inhibit the reverse transcriptase of HIV-1. J. Nat. Prod. 60, 1251–1260 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Shai, Y. Mode of action of membrane active antimicrobial peptides. Biopolymers 66, 236–248 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Hameed, A. S. et al. In vitro antibacterial activity of ZnO and Nd doped ZnO nanoparticles against ESBL producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Sci. Rep. 6, 24312 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Dhara, L., Tripathi, A. & Pal, A. Molecular characterization and in silico analysis of naturally occurring TEM β-lactamase variants among pathogenic Enterobacteriaceae infecting Indian patients. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013, 783540 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Bhagavat, R., Saqib, A. & Karigar, C. Molecular docking studies of novel palmitoyl- ligands for cyclooxygenase-2. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 79, 1043–1048 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are grateful to Dr Hemalatha Rao, Medwin Hospital (Hyderabad, India) for providing the clinical isolates. We thank the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding the work through the research group project (Ref No RGP-VPP-332). We thank DST- PURSE scheme (Project Ref No- SR/FT/LS-113/2009) of the Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi, India, for the Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy facility. This work was otherwise supported by the Project (Ref No BT/PR4815/AAQ/3/587/2012, BT/PR6619/PBD/26/310/2013, BT/IN/Indo-UK/SuBB/23/NT/2013 and BT/PR7005/PBD/ 26/357/2015) sanctioned by the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), New Delhi, India.

Author contributions

AP and NT performed most of the experiments and drafted the manuscript; MUR carried out the sample collection from humans and identified the bacterial strains; KPMN investigated the antibiotic resistance pattern and identified ESBL producers; NR contributed to the amplification of ESBL genes and interpretation of results; SS obtained the microphotograph and identification of cyanobacterium; MYMI contributed in 16S DNA amplification in ESBL producers; NSA, CA and SAA equally contributed in the analysis and interpretation of data; MAA carried out the cell line study, coordinated the manuscript drafting and language editing. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nooruddin Thajuddin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on The Journal of Antibiotics website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parveez Ahamed, A., Rasheed, M., Peer Muhamed Noorani, K. et al. In vitro antibacterial activity of MGDG-palmitoyl from Oscillatoria acuminata NTAPC05 against extended-spectrum β-lactamase producers. J Antibiot 70, 754–762 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links