Introduction

Human African trypanosomiasis (HAT), also known as Sleeping Sickness, is recognized as one of the world's most neglected diseases and causes significant and widespread mortality and morbidity in sub-Saharan Africa. Two sub-species of trypanosomes, Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense (found in eastern and southern Africa) and T. b. gambiense (found in west and central Africa) infect humans and wild animals, as well as domestic animals, such as pigs and dogs. Another sub-species, T. b. brucei, infect cattle, causing Nagana disease, which devastates livestock production and causes massive economic losses.

The trypanosome parasites are transmitted through the bite of blood-sucking tsetse flies (Glossina spp.). Transmission of T. b. gambiense is mostly human-to-human, whereas wild animals and humans both act as reservoir hosts for T. b. rhodesiense. During a bite from an infected tsetse, parasites are introduced into the bloodstream in which they multiply and then pass into the lymph system. This represents the early stage of HAT, during which the patient may suffer from fever, headaches, joint pains or itchiness. The second, or late, stage is more critical, because of parasites crossing the blood–brain barrier and invading the central nervous system. This results in loss of sensation, neuropathy, sleeping disorder, coma and ultimately death. T. b. rhodesiense infection is acute, lasting from a few weeks to several months, whereas T. b. gambiense infection is chronic, persisting for several years, during which times patients may be asymptomatic. In the absence of effective diagnosis and treatment, both forms cause death in humans, the former much more rapidly.

Accurate statistics for HAT are lacking, as many cases are not reported. The World Health Organization estimated that, in 2000, the disease affected some 300 000 Africans, a figure far in excess of the 27 000 cases reportedly diagnosed and treated that year. By 2005, surveillance had been reinforced, case reporting improved and was held to be more accurate, with the number of new cases actually reported falling substantially. Between 1998 and 2004, the figure for cases of both forms of the disease combined was estimated to have fallen from 37 991 to 17 616, reducing further to 10 769 in 2007. The estimated number of actual cases of infection is currently 50 000–70 000.1, 2

Currently, the drugs pentamidine and suramin are used in the early stage of T. b. gambiense and T. b. rhodesiense infections, and melarsoprol is used in the late stage, whereas eflornithine is only used in the late stage of T. b. gambiense infections. These drugs are old and highly unsatisfactory, as they cannot be given orally and can be dangerous because of their severe toxicity. Melarsoprol is particularly hazardous, with 5–10% of patients dying because of toxic side effects.3 Suramin, discovered in 1921, which is still commonly used for treatment of early-stage T. b. rhodesiense, provokes undesirable side effects in the urinary tract and causes major allergic reactions. Pentamidine, routinely used for treatment of early-stage Gambiense sleeping sickness was introduced in 1941 and, despite a few undesirable effects, it is generally well tolerated by patients. However, drug resistance in trypanosomes is increasing and treatment failures are becoming more common.4, 5 Therefore, there is an urgent need for new antitrypanosomal drugs that are more effective and safer, especially those that have novel structures and mechanisms of action.

During our program to screen soil microorganisms and compounds from the antibiotic library of the Kitasato Institute for Life Sciences to discover antitrypanosomal substances, we earlier reported that various microbial metabolites exhibit potent antitrypanosomal properties.6, 7 We have discovered a further three peptide antibiotics, leucinostatin A and B (produced by soil fungi, Paecilomyces sp.) and alamethicin I and tsushimycin (from the antibiotic library) (Figure 1), which show potent or moderate antitrypanosomal properties. We report here the in vitro and in vivo antitrypanosomal activities and cytotoxicities of these peptide antibiotics, as compared with the widely used trypanocidal drug suramin.

Figure 1
figure 1

Structures of leucinostatin A and B, alamethicin I and tsushimycin.

Leucinostatins, isolated from cultured broth of Paecilomyces spp., were discovered to possess antitrypanosomal properties, although the structure–activity relationship of antitrypanosomal compounds remains unknown.8

The present observations are the first reports of in vitro and in vivo antitrypanosomal activities of leucinostatin A and B, alamethicin I and tsushimycin.

Materials and methods

Chemicals

Leucinostatin A and B were isolated from a culture broth of Paecilomyces sp., FKI-3045 at the Kitasato Institute for Life Sciences. Alamethicin I and tsushimycin were obtained from the antibiotics library of the Kitasato Institute for Life Sciences.

Suramin was provided by Professor R Brun (Swiss Tropical Institute, Basel, Switzerland). Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium (with L-glutamine and HEPES, without NaHCO3), minimum essential medium (MEM) with Earle's salts, MEM non-essential amino acids solution and penicillin–streptomycin solution were obtained from Gibco Laboratories Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY, USA). Fetal bovine serum was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Inc (St Louis, MO, USA) and horse serum was obtained from Gibco Laboratories Life Technologies. Alamar Blue reagent was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Inc.. Other chemicals were commercially available and all of analytical grade.

Taxonomic studies of FKI-3045

Fungal strain FKI-3045 was isolated from soil collected in Ishigaki Island, Okinawa, Japan. The micro-morphological characteristics of samples were observed under a Vanox-S AH-2 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and the ITS1 sequence of the strain FKI-3045 was deposited at the DNA Data Bank of Japan, with accession number AB480689. From the results of general characteristics,9 the total length of the ITS1 and BLAST search,10 the producing strain FKI-3045 was identified as a strain of Paecilomyces sp.

Fermentation, isolation and identification of leucinostatins

A loopful of spores of Paecilomyces sp. FKI-3045 was inoculated into 100 ml of seed medium consisting of 2.0% glucose, 0.2% yeast extract, 0.5% Polypepton (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan), 0.05%·MgSO4 7H2O, 0.1% KH2PO4 and 0.1% agar (adjusted to pH 6.0 before sterilization) in a 500-ml Erlenmeyer flask. The inoculated tube was incubated in a rotary shaker (210 r.p.m.) at 27 °C for 3 days. The seed culture (1 ml) was transferred to 500-ml Erlenmeyer flasks (total 93 flasks) containing 100 ml of production medium consisting of 1.0% glucose, 2.0% soluble starch, 2.0% soybean oil, 1.0% Pharmamedia (Traders Protein, Lubbock, TX, USA), 0.5% meat extract, 0.1% MgSO4·7H2O, 5.0 × 10−4% FeSO4·7H2O, 5.0 × 10−4% MgCl2·4H2O, 5.0 × 10−4% CuSO4·5H2O and 5.0 × 10−4% CoCl2·6H2O and 0.3% CaCO3 (adjusted to pH 6.0 before sterilization), and the fermentation was carried out on a rotary shaker (210 r.p.m.) at 27 °C for 3 days, followed by stasis at 27 °C for 6 days.

The 9-day-old culture broth (9.3 l) was extracted with EtOH, followed by filtration. The fitrate was extracted with EtOAc. The EtOAc extract (12.1 g) was applied to a Diaion HP20 column (100φ × 120 mm, Nippon Rensui Co., Tokyo, Japan). After washing with 50 and 60% acetone aq soln (3 l each), the active materials were eluted with 80% acetone aq soln. The material (10.2 g) was applied to an octadecylsilyl (ODS) column (35φ × 200 mm, Senshu Scientific Co., Tokyo, Japan). After washing with 20 and 40% CH3CN/0.1% HCOOH aq soln (400 ml each), the active materials were eluted with 60% CH3CN/0.1% HCOOH aq soln. The material (66.8 mg) was purified by HPLC on a Xbridge phenylhexyl column (10φ × 250 mm, Waters Co., Tokyo, Japan) with 60% CH3CN/10 mM NH4OAc aq soln (pH 10) at 2.5 ml min−1 detected at UV 210 nm. Each active fraction at the retention times of 22 and 26 min was concentrated in vacuo to dryness to afford leucinostatins B (6.9 mg) and A (9.8 mg) as white powders, respectively.

The 1H NMR spectra of leucinostatins indicated α-proton signals of amino acid residues at δH 4.0–5.5 p.p.m. and singlet methyl signals of aminoisobutylic acid residues at δH 1.5–1.6 p.p.m. The 13C NMR spectra indicated α-carbon signals of amino acid residues at δC 50–60 p.p.m. and amide carbonyl carbons at δC 175.5–189 p.p.m. Leucinostatins A and B were identified by protonated ion peak (m/z, [M+H]+ 1218.6 ans 1024.6) and fragment ion peaks (A: m/z, 997.7, 784.6, 655.5, 631.1, 570.4, 546.0, 457,4, 435.3, 344.3, 259.2 and 222.2, B: m/z, 983.5, 770.3, 641.1, 556.3, 546.2, 443.0, 329.9, 222.0 and 111.9) observed in electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) analysis, respectively.

Trypanosomes

Bloodstream forms of parasite used were T. b. brucei strain GUTat 3.1, T. b. rhodesiense strain STIB900 and T. b. brucei strain S427, as described earlier.6, 7

Animals

Female CD1 mice (ICR), 20–25 g, were obtained from Charles River Japan Inc. (Kanagawa, Japan). Animals were placed in groups of four per cage, kept in a room under negative pressure with flow of 0.1–0.2 m sec−1. The animal room was held at a temperature of 25±2 °C and 60±10% relative humidity. Animals were maintained on a diet of CE-2 (Clea Japan Inc., Tokyo, Japan) and water ad libitum.

In vitro assay

In vitro antitrypanosomal activities for T. b. brucei strain GUTat 3.1 and T. b. rhodesiense strain STIB900 has been described earlier.6 In brief, 95 μl of parasites suspension was incubated with 5 μl of drug solution for 72 h and Alamar Blue was used for parasites survival determination to calculate IC50 values.

Cytotoxicity assay against MRC-5 cells was carried out as described earlier.11

In vivo assay

In vivo antitrypanosomal activities for T. b. brucei strain S427 and T. b. rhodesiense strain STIB900 were described earlier.7 In brief, female ICR mice were infected i.p. with parasites prepared from cryostabilate and drug treatment was carried out for 4 consecutive days. Efficacy of drug was determined by parasitaemia levels and the mean of survival days (MSD), compared with the untreated control group.

Results

Table 1 shows in vitro antitrypanosomal activities of leucinostatin A and B, alamethicin I, tsushimycin and suramin. Leucinostatin A and B showed the most potent activity against both strains GUTat 3.1 and STIB900, with IC50 values ranging from 3.4–8.3 ng ml−1. Leucinostatins show approximately 200-fold higher activity than suramin against the GUTat 3.1 strain. In the case of STIB900, they showed 12- to 15-fold higher values than suramin. Alamethicin I also showed potent impact against the GUTat 3.1 strain, with an IC50 value of 170 ng ml−1, some 9.3-fold lower value than suramin. Although tsushimycin showed the lowest IC50 value of the three, it was still similar to that of suramin. The antitrypanosomal activity on strain STIB900 of both alamethicin I and tsushimycin was lower than that of suramin.

Table 1 In vitro antitrypanosomal activity and cytotoxicity of leucinostatin A and B, alamethicin I, tsushimycin and drugs used to treat Human African Trypanosomiasis

Evaluation of cytotoxicities of the peptides against MRC-5 cells is also shown in Table 1. The IC50 values ranged between 2550–>100 000 ng ml−1. As a means to evaluate both antitrypanosomal activity and cytotoxicity, we introduced a selectivity index (SI), which is obtained by dividing IC50 of cytotoxicity by IC50 of antitrypanosomal activity. The SI of compounds tested is shown in Table 1. All three peptides had a higher SI than suramin in the case of strain GUTat 3.1/MRC-5, whereas in the case of STIB900 they were lower than suramin.

Table 2 shows in vivo antitrypanosomal activity, using the T. b. brucei S427 acute mouse model with leucinostatin A and B, alamethicin I, tsushimycin and suramin. Leucinostatin B showed curative effect at a dose of 1.0 mg kg−1 × 4, the same curative dosage as for suramin. Tsushimycin also showed a curative effect at a dose of 50 mg kg−1 × 4. Alamethicin I did not achieve cure at a dose of 3.0 mg kg−1 × 4, but extended the MSD, animals surviving approximately threefold longer than the untreated controls. Leucinostatin A and B did not show in vivo antitrypanosomal activity at a dose of 0.3 mg kg−1 × 4. The LD50 of leucinostatin A is reported to be 1.8 mg kg−1 i.p.,12 therefore we tried 0.3 mg kg−1 i.p. × 4 to try and avoid any toxic symptoms during treatment. Leucinostatin B showed toxicity at a dose of 2.5 mg kg−1 × 2 i.p.; however, treated mice withstood the toxicity and the infection was completely cured (data not shown). We also carried out in vivo evaluation using the T. b. rhodesiense strain STIB900 acute model with leucinostatin B (Table 3). Leucinostatin B showed 20% cure activity, extending MSD by >28 days at the 1.0 mg kg−1 × 4 dosage. Suramin did not show curative activity, though it did cause extended MSD (by 25 days) using a dose of 1.0 mg kg−1 × 4. At the 10 mg kg−1 × 4 dosage level with suramin, a 50% curative rate was observed, with an extension of MSD by >39.3 days.

Table 2 In vivo antitrypanosomal activity of leucinostatin A and B, alamethicin I, tsushimycin, pentamidine and suramin in T. b. brucei S427 mouse model
Table 3 In vivo antitrypanosomal activity of leucinostatin B, pentamidine and suramin in T. b. rhodesience STIB900 mouse model

Discussion

With regard to the commonly used therapeutic drugs, the mode of action of suramin and pentamidine remains unknown, whereas that of melarsoprol is poorly characterized.3

Leucinostatins,13, 14, 15 alamethicin I16, 17 and tsushimycin18 are lipophilic peptide antibiotics produced as microbial metabolites. These antibiotics showed potent and moderately antitrypanosomal activity both in vitro and in vivo. Significantly, these three peptide antibiotics exhibited different characteristics compared with suramin with respect to sensitivity against strain GUTat 3.1 and strain STIB900. Consequently, the mode of action of the three might be different to that of suramin.

Leucinostatin acts on gram-positive bacteria,13, 14 as an uncoupler in mitochondria,14, 19, 20, 21 inhibitor of mitochondrial ATP synthesis,22 weak ionophore and immunosuppressant,23 blocker of virus glycoprotein expression24 and as a nematicide.25

Although the bloodstream form of T. brucei has no oxidative phosphorylation,26 T. brucei mitochondrial ATP synthetase has been isolated and characterized.27 Brown et al.28 reported that ATP synthetase is responsible for the maintenance of membrane potential in blood-stream form trypanosomes, showing that RNAi knockdown of the α and β subunits of the F1 portion of ATP synthetase caused a slowdown in cell growth. It is therefore possible that leucinostatin A and B might be specific against T. brucei ATP synthetase.

Ishiguro et al.29 reported that leucinostatin might act on membrane phospholipids. When leucinostatin A acts as an ionophore, mono- (H+ and 86Rb+) and divalent (45Ca2+ and 65Zn2+) cations were transported across both mouse thymocyte and artificial membrane and it increases intracellular calcium and decreases intracellular pH in the mouse thymocyte.23 T. brucei bloodstream-form parasites exposed to A-23187 (calcium ionophore) show gradual cell swelling, eventually forming a spherical appearance that was completed within 45 min.30 Ruben et al. reported that intracellular calcium was increased approximately threefold by the addition of 4Br-A23187 (calcium ionophore) and intracellular calcium was superinduced with the proton ionophore FCCP, the K+/H+ exchanger nigericin, and also intracellular pH was decreased.31 They also reported that amphiphilic peptide and amine caused Ca2+ influx across the plasma membrane, but did not disrupt membrane integrity.32

Ca2+ is a major signal transduction molecule in several organisms, including protozoan parasites.33 Acidocalcisomes are the main Ca2+ storage compartment in trypanosomatids and apicomplexan parasites, as well as an energy store for Ca2+ signaling and intracellular pH homeostasis.34 We had already found that leucinostatin A possesses antimalarial properties.35 There is thus an expectation that leucinostatins act as ionophores and disrupt parasite homeostasis resulting in antiparasite impact, but there might be an as yet unknown mode of action, including mitochondrial ATP synthesis inhibition, because leucinostatins show highly potent antiparasite activity both in vitro and in vivo.

Alamethicin I is reported to have mostly anti-gram-positive bacterial activity,36 act as an uncoupler of oxidative phosphorylation in rat mitochondria37 and possess hemolytic activity.38 The mode of action of alamethicin is considered to be through its effect on biomembrane systems by ion channel formation in lipid-membranes bilayers.17, 39, 40 It was reported that alamethicin seems to form ionic channels on chromaffin cells, which are permeable to Ca2+, Mn2+ and Ni2+.41 Dathe et al.42 reported that alamethicin induces catecholamine secretion from chromaffin cells and enhanced metabolic activity in endothelial cells. They showed that catecholamine secretion from bovine adrenal chromaffin cell was enhanced by alamethicin dose-dependently in Ca2+-containing medium, whereas there was no effect using Ca2+-free medium. They suggested a peptide-mediated Ca2+ entry into the cells. Alamethicin I might also act as an ionophore.

Tsushimycin, isolated from the culture broth of a Streptomyces strain, is related to the amphomycin–glumamycin group of antibiotics.18, 43 The mode of action of tsushimycin is reportedly through inhibition of the formation of dolichyl phosphate mannose, dolichyl phosphate glucose and dolichyl pyrophosphate N-acetylglucosamine, using particulate enzyme preparation from pig aorta.44 The related antibiotic, amphomycin, is reported to show in vivo antitrypanosomal activity against T. b. gambiense- and T. b. rhodesiense-infected mice.45 Furthermore, amphomycin showed inhibition of trypanosomal dolichol phosphate mannose synthase that gives mannose from dolichol phosphate mannose to synthesize the glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor under the cell-free system.46 Tsushimycin may also inhibit T. brucei in the same manner as amphomycin. Study of the crystallized tsushimycin suggested that bioactive tsushimycin is most likely to involve Ca2+ ions that may interact with bacteria cell membranes at their fatty-acid side chain.43

The mode of action of the three antibiotics reported here is mainly expected to be via interaction with the membrane-lipid layer of trypanosomes.

It has been reported that antimicrobial peptides, such as defensins, cathelicidins47 and some cathelicidin families48 showed antitrypanosomal activity against both the bloodstream form and procyclic form of T. brucei. Especially, protegrin-1, a cathelicidin-class peptide showed in vivo survival elongation effect with daily treatment of 5 mg kg−1 i.p., treated parasites showing significant morphological change.47 The mode of action was described as disruption of cell wall/membrane integrity because of cationic and amphipathic characteristics. On the basis of cationic and amphipathic antibacterial peptides, Gonzalez-Reyet et al.49 reported that vasoactive intestinal polypeptide and the structurally related pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide have antitrypanosomal activity, specifically against the bloodstream form of parasites and that these peptides enter into and accumulate in the parasite cytosol.

Antimicrobial peptides have been classified into four groups on the basis of their structure (β-sheet, α-helical, extended and loop) and cationic and amphipathic characters.50 We showed that antitrypanosomal activity of the peptide antibiotics discussed have cationic and lipophilic character in the structure (Figure 1) and also these antibiotics have any of the β-sheet, α-helical or loop conformations.17, 43, 51 Therefore, these peptides might act more selectively on T. brucei than mammalian cells, in spite of their toxicity. In the case of leucinostatin A, it has been reported that leucinostatin A-loaded nanospheres show anti-Candida albicans activity both in vitro and in vivo, but with drastic reduction of toxicity.52

The above results reveal that leucinostatin A and B, alamethicin I and tsushimycin are promising lead compounds for a new type of antitrypanosomal activity. Further investigation of the antitrypanosomal potential of these peptide antibiotics is in progress.