Abstract
The Geodermatophilaceae are unique model systems to study the ability to thrive on or within stones and their proteogenomes (referring to the whole protein arsenal encoded by the genome) could provide important insight into their adaptation mechanisms. Here we report the detailed comparative genome analysis of Blastococcus saxobsidens (Bs), Modestobacter marinus (Mm) and Geodermatophilus obscurus (Go) isolated respectively from the interior and the surface of calcarenite stones and from desert sandy soils. The genome-scale analysis of Bs, Mm and Go illustrates how adaptation to these niches can be achieved through various strategies including ‘molecular tinkering/opportunism’ as shown by the high proportion of lost, duplicated or horizontally transferred genes and ORFans. Using high-throughput discovery proteomics, the three proteomes under unstressed conditions were analyzed, highlighting the most abundant biomarkers and the main protein factors. Proteomic data corroborated previously demonstrated stone-related ecological distribution. For instance, these data showed starvation-inducible, biofilm-related and DNA-protection proteins as signatures of the microbes associated with the interior, surface and outside of stones, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Geodermatophilaceae are an actinobacterial family (Normand, 2006) in the order Geodermatophiliales (Sen et al., 2014) that comprises three genera: Geodermatophilus, Blastococcus and Modestobacter initially isolated from desert soils (Luedemann, 1968), sea water (Ahrens and Moll, 1970) and Antarctic regolith (Mevs et al., 2000), respectively. These three genera have a complex life cycle and produce remarkably resistant enzymes such as esterases (Essoussi et al., 2010; Jaouani et al., 2012; Normand et al., 2014). They also have the ability to resist adverse environmental conditions such as ultraviolet light, ionizing radiation, desiccation and heavy metals (Rainey et al., 2005; Gtari et al., 2012; Montero-Calasanz et al., 2014, 2015). This resistance to environmental hazards represents a trait of Terrabacteria, a well-supported phylogenetic group composed of Actinobacteria and four other major lineages of eubacteria (Firmicutes, Cyanobacteria, Chloroflexi and Deinococcus-Thermus) that colonized land 3.05–2.78 Ga (Tunnacliffe and Lapinski, 2003; Battistuzzi et al., 2004; Battistuzzi and Hedges, 2009).
Surprisingly, Geodermatophilaceae are present in a variety of biotopes including prominently rocks (Eppard et al., 1996) and desert sandy soils (Montero-Calasanz et al., 2012, 2013, 2013a, 2013c, 2013d, 2013e, 2013f; Liu et al., 2014). Although considered endemic to soils, evolution of Geodermatophilaceae has continued in specialized land biotopes. Indeed, soil and stone niches have yielded a wealth of knowledge regarding the extant distribution of Geodermatophilaceae (Gtari et al., 2012; Normand et al., 2014), raising questions about their evolution and the mechanisms of adaptation to harsh environments.
After their uplift by storms, Geodermatophilaceae have the potential to travel thousands of kilometers in the atmosphere (Chuvochina et al., 2011). Consequently, stone surfaces can be colonized by these wind-borne microbes (Essoussi et al., 2012). These surfaces are often covered with growth (called ‘patinas’, ‘varnish-like’ or ‘tintenstriches’), which comprises complex communities of eukaryotes and prokaryotes, recurrent among which are Actinobacteria (Eppard et al., 1996; Kuhlman et al., 2006) including Geodermatophilaceae (Urzi et al., 2001). With regard to biopitting, one hypothesis is that acid secretion and high carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from combustion engines result in alternating episodes of calcareous solubilization and precipitation. The microbial communities located in biopits have been analyzed by microbiological and molecular methods, and has been found to be complex, with a recurrence of Geodermatophilaceae. To deduce strategies for the dispersal of established biofilms and propose restoration approaches, identification of the components of the matrix of these biopolymers is required (Nijland et al., 2010).
To understand how Geodermatophilaceae adapt to stones and soil, here we present a proteogenome analysis and detailed comparison of B. saxobsidens (Bs) (Chouaia et al., 2012), M. marinus (Mm) (Normand et al., 2012) and G. obscurus (Go) (Ivanova et al., 2010). To get a close-up view of their physiology, we analyzed the proteome content of stationary-phase Bs, Mm and Go cells by a liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) shotgun approach and semi-quantification by spectral counting. We focussed on the identification of interesting proteic biomarkers of potential physiological value. Bs, Mm and Go are the first Geodermatophilaceae whose genomes and proteomes have been analyzed jointly. Now, they represent new models of choice for studies of niche adaptation among Terrabacteria.
Materials and methods
Bioinformatics approaches
Genes were classed into Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) (Tatusov et al., 2001) and were retrieved from the Mage platform (Vallenet et al., 2006). Metabolic pathways were analyzed using BioCyc (Caspi et al., 2010). Identification of duplicated, lost or horizontally transferred genes was done using the Mage platform (phyloprofile) as was the identification of the core and extended genome. Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats were identified with the CRISPI database http://crispi.genouest.org/ (Rousseau et al., 2009). Genomic islands were identified with IslandViewer available at http://www.pathogenomics.sfu.ca/islandviewer/query.php (Langille and Brinkman, 2009). Phylogenetic analysis was done using MEGA6 (Tamura et al., 2013) and the inferred topology was drawn and integrated with the genomic context at the Microbial Genomic context Viewer accessible at http://mgcv.cmbi.ru.nl/ (Overmars et al., 2013).
Correspondence analysis was done as previously described (Benzécri, 1973) using the R software (R Development Core Team, 2007) on COG numbers (obtained from the Mage platform/Genomic Tools) and on numbers of coding DNA sequences (CDS) containing transcription and signaling domains (obtained from the Mage platform/Search Interpro) as previously described (Santos et al., 2009).
Bacterial growth and proteome sample preparation
Cells of DD2 (Bs), BC501 (Mm) and DSM 43160 (Go) were plated onto Luedemann medium (yeast extract, malt extract, glucose, soluble starch and calcium carbonate (CaCO3)) and incubated for 72 h at 28 °C as described previously (Luedemann, 1968). Bacterial cultures (15 mg wet weight) were resuspended into 90 μl of lithium dodecyl sulfate β-mercaptoethanol protein gel sample buffer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and incubated at 99 °C for 5 min as indicated previously (Hartmann et al., 2014). Before SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis on 10% Bis-Tris NuPAGE gels (Invitrogen), the samples were briefly centrifuged to remove large aggregates. A volume of 20 μl of the proteome of Bs, Mm and Go (corresponding to 160 μg of total proteins) was loaded per well. Three independent biological replicates were analyzed per microorganism. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-PAGE was carried out in 1 × 3-(N-morpholino) propanesulfonic acid solution (Invitrogen) on a XCell SureLock Mini-cell (Invitrogen) under a constant voltage of 200 V for 5 min. Gels were stained with SimplyBlue SafeStain, a ready-to-use Coomassie G-250 stain (Invitrogen). SeeBlue Plus2 (Invitrogen) was used as a molecular weight marker. Polyacrylamide gel bands (equivalent in volume to 50 μl) comprising the entire proteomes—one band per entire proteome—were cut and processed for in-gel proteolysis with Trypsin Sequencing Grade (Roche, Meylan, France) followed by the ProteaseMax protocol (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) as described previously (Clair et al., 2010).
Nano liquid chromatography–MS/MS analysis
Peptide digests were resolved on an Ultimate 3000 LC systerm, Dionex-LC Packings (Thermo-Scientific, Villebon-sur-Yvette, France) before MS/MS measurements were done with a LTQ-Orbitrap XL (Thermo-Scientific) as described previously (Dedieu et al., 2011). MS/MS spectra were processed and interpreted with the MASCOT 2.3.02 search engine (Matrix Science, London, UK) with standard parameters as indicated previously (Hartmann and Armengaud, 2014) against databases corresponding to a complete list of annotated CDS from either Bs (NCBI RefSeq: NC_016943.1), Mm (BioProject: PRJEA167487, PRJEA82845) or Go (BioProject: PRJNA43725, PRJNA29547). Peptide matches with a score above their peptidic identity threshold were filtered at P<0.05. A protein was only validated when at least two peptides had been assigned. Using a previously described approach (Liu et al., 2004; Zivanovic et al., 2009), protein abundance was evaluated by shotgun analysis using MS/MS spectral counts. Normalized spectral count abundance factors were calculated (Paoletti et al., 2006). The sum of all normalized spectral count abundance factors —100%—was calculated for each bacterium: Bs (142.63), Mm (46.38) and Go (162.87). Accordingly, all values in this study were separated from the locus tags with a comma or between parentheses and represent the normalized spectral count abundance factor percentages, unless otherwise stipulated. The MS proteomics data have been deposited at the open access library of ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://www.proteomexchange.org/) (Vizcaino et al., 2014) with the data set identifiers PXD001519, PXD001518 and PXD001520 for Bs, Mm and Go, respectively.
Results and Discussion
Characteristics of proteogenomes
Life in biotopes with low trophic resources has driven the three Geodermatophilaceae members toward medium-sized genomes (Ivanova et al., 2010; Chouaia et al., 2012; Normand et al., 2012) from 4.87 to 5.32 Mb (Figure 1 and Supplementary Table S1). The three plasmidless genomes had very high G+C% (72.95–74.1%). Under unstressed conditions, the three proteomes were analyzed by a high-throughput shotgun procedure (Christie-Oleza and Armengaud, 2010). For Bs (PXD001519, 39889 MS/MS spectra, Supplementary Data S1), Mm (PXD001518, 14729 MS/MS spectra, Supplementary Data S2) and Go (PXD001520, 14829 MS/MS spectra, Supplementary Data S3), 5506, 1940 and 6884 spectra could be assigned to 553, 100 and 370 proteins, respectively. These three data sets represent the first proteogenome references for Geodermatophilaceae. Figure 1 depicts the proteins detected in this study.
We have predicted 3277 genes (30% amino acid identity) shared by the 3 genomes, which were sorted into 7 possible and mutually exclusive Venn groups (Supplementary Figure S1). Significant similarity to previously reported genes of known function allowed us to assign a putative function to 3231, 3643 and 3351 protein-coding genes in Bs, Mm and Go, respectively. The remaining genes were designated ‘proteins with unknown function’. The analysed proteomes of Bs, Mm and Go indicate the expression of four, two and three such ‘proteins of unknown function’ (Supplementary Table S2), among the most highly expressed proteins—55, 9 and 42 as summarized in Supplementary Figure S2—that account for half of the total number of assigned spectra, respectively. As will become apparent below, some of these ‘proteins of unknown function’ seem to have a primordial role in niche adaptation of the host bacteria.
The three genomes have 70% of their CDS that could be ascribed to the COG category (Supplementary Table S3) (Tatusov et al., 2001; Vallenet et al., 2006). Correspondance analysis showed that the three Geodermatophilaceae genomes are close to one another. All three, in particular Bs and Mm, have a high proportion of [T] (signal) and [P] (inorganic ion transport and metabolism) categories, which is evocative of a lifestyle in a mineral-rich biotope (Supplementary Figure S3A). The overall distribution of the COG profile as well as the abundance of transcription factors and signaling molecules (Supplementary Figures S3B and C) constitute a signature that may be associated to lifestyle (Santos et al., 2009). Compared with other Actinobacteria, the three genomes contained the highest absolute numbers of CDS containing PAS and EAL domains (Supplementary Figure S3C).
Our proteomic results showed that the most represented COG categories among the most highly expressed proteins are as follows: [J] translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis (~33%), [C] energy production and conversion (~22%) and [I] lipid transport and metabolism (~9%) in Bs; [G] carbohydrate transport and metabolism (~33%), [E] amino acid transport and metabolism (~22%) and [P] (~22%) in Mm; and [J] (~33%), [C] (~26%) and [P] (~7%) in Go. The category [P] is represented by >5% of the most highly expressed proteins of Bs. These proteomic results are a further support for the presence of the monophyletic group composed of Bs and Go, which has been confirmed in silico by bioinformatics (Sen et al., 2014) as well as in vitro by microbiological and biochemical markers (Normand et al., 2014).
‘Molecular tinkering/opportunism’strategies
Bs, Mm and Go genomes exhibit at least three strategies related to ‘molecular tinkering/opportunism’ (Jacob, 1977; Gogarten et al., 2002; Laubichler, 2007) (Supplementary Table S4): (i) domain duplication; (ii) horizontal gene transfer, genes absent in two of the analyzed genomes but present in one of a group of more distant Actinobacteria; and (iii) rapid evolution, to create ORFans (Daubin and Ochman, 2004; Fukuchi and Nishikawa, 2004). Mm has 429 duplicated genes (7.9% of the genome), whereas in Bs and Go the number of these genes is slightly lower (representing 4.8% and 6.5%, respectively). Removal of a complex nutrient induced a motile state in these bacteria—motile budding rods called R-forms (Ishiguro and Wolfe, 1970, 1974). The most highly expressed protein in Bs and Mm was flagellin synthesis, Lin (BLASA_0851, 4.96% and MODMU_1040, 11.51%) that has a paralog encoding a flagellar hook-associated protein FigL (BLASA_0855 and MODMU_1044). The same duplication event was observed in Go between similar paralogs, a flagellin (Gobs_0985, 0.02%) and a FigL (Gobs_0990). Rates of horizontal gene transfer amount to 6.9%, 8.9% and 6.8% in Bs, Mm and Go, respectively, which is consistant with hostile rock environments where antibiosis is often an unaffordable luxury (Friedmann and Ocampo-Friedmann, 1984). For example, our proteomic analyses indicated the presence of a transposase in Bs (BLASA_4384, 0.01%). The number of ORFans with 7.4–10.2% of the three genomes is much higher than the number found for Escherichia coli (3.5%) (Daubin and Ochman, 2004), a difference that could be linked to an unexpectedly higher rate of horizontal gene transfer in, on the surface and outside stones than in the promiscuous gastrointestinal tract. Our proteomic approach allowed the identification of five, two and six ORFans that may have important functional roles in Bs, Mm and Go, respectively (Supplementary Table S2). A computation of lost genes—genes present in two genomes but absent in the third—shows that Bs, by far, had the highest number of lost genes (515 CDS) (Supplementary Table S4).
First-line defense strategies
Genome analyses indicate that Bs, Mm and Go possess several genes putatively involved in carotenoid biosynthesis (Supplementary Table S5). The Bs orange pigment absorbs at 230–270 and at 450–500 nm, whereas Mm and Go pigments are quite comparable and absorb almost continuously between 200 and 750 nm (Supplementary Figure S4). Bs has a putative operon (BLASA_0209–0214, crtB2, hopC, ispA, shc, hpnH, ilvC) that is absent in Mm and Go, and this could explain its intense orange pigment. Moreover, the expression of an uncharacterized enzyme involved in pigment biosynthesis (BLASA_3306, 0.05%) was detected in Bs.
The three genomes also possess impressive arrays of genes involved in stress relief, reactive oxygen species (ROS, superoxide anions (O2•−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and hydroxyl radicals (HO•)) detoxification and DNA protection and repair (Supplementary Table S6). The Bs, Mm and Go proteomes express a nickel-containing superoxide dismutase (BLASA_3991, 0.83%; MODMU_4573, 0.57%; and Gobs_4176, 0.29%) and two catalases. Catalase (KatE) was one of the most highly expressed proteins in Mm (MODMU_2078, 4.64%). Its ortholog, Gobs_2125 (0.74%), belongs to the first 42 proteins that accounted for half of the total number of assigned spectra to the proteome of Go. Bs also highly expressed KatE (BLASA_3094, 0.54%). In addition, Bs expressed a manganese-containing catalase (KatA: BLASA_0196, 0.04%), but to a lesser extent than Go KatE (only 2 versus 75 spectral counts, when cumulating data from the triplicated samples). The transformation of the non-essential amino acid sarcosine, a source of carbon and energy derived from the osmoprotectant betaine, into the essential amino acid glycine generates H2O2. The sarcosine oxidase subunits (soxB, soxD and soxA) and carbon monoxide (CO) dehydrogenase subunit G (coxG) genes form an operon in ROS-resistant Mm and Go (MODMU_3072–MODMU_3075 and Gobs_2883–Gobs_2880, respectively), and were not detected in the ROS-sensitive Bs (Gtari et al., 2012). Supplementary Table S7 lists other selected physiological features present in Bs, Mm and Go. For instance, in accordance with our previously published experimental data (Gtari et al., 2012), orthologs of metal tolerance determinants (Janssen et al., 2010) were detected in the three studied genomes.
Linear density of genomic DNA double-strand breaks inflicted per Gy per Mbp (0.002–0.004) is similar for diverse bacteria (Daly (2009, 2011) and references therein). Acute doses of 0.9, 6 and 9 kGy (Gtari et al., 2012) are predicted to inflict ~18, ~128 and ~192 double-strand breaks in Bs (~4.88 Mbp), Mm (~5.33 Mbp) and Go (~5.33 Mbp), respectively. Although absent in almost all actinobacterial species, all three genomes contained a non-homologous end joining operon, BLASA_3099–BLASA_3097 in Bs, MODMU_2074–MODMU_2076 in Mm and Gobs_2119–Gobs_2121 in Go, (Supplementary Figure S5). Bs possesses a supplementary putative Ku protein (BLASA_1744) that forms another operon with ‘proteins of unknown function’. These findings suggest that non-homologous end joining may be a major pathway of double-strand breaks repair in Geodermatophilaceae.
Most abundant proteomic biomarkers and niche signatures
Bs was isolated from deep (2 cm), from stones found around the Mediterranean using a chisel and hammer, to eliminate the surface layers (Urzi et al., 2004), and it is predominant in the deeper fraction, that is, about 2 cm below the stone surface (Gtari et al., 2012). The proteomic analysis results (Supplementary Figure S2) suggest that unstressed Bs has evolved a survival strategy inside stones based on the following: (i) heavy investment in protein synthesis and in preventing their aggregation (ribosomal proteins and GroEL); (ii) detection and response to the changes of the environmental external nutrients (UDP glucose, phosphate and so on) concentrations (LysM, UshA and PhoU) (Buist et al., 2008; Marzan and Shimizu, 2011); (iii) scavenging ROS (superoxide dismutase); and (iv) transport of oxygen (hemerythrin). The presence of enzymes using anaerobic terminal electron acceptors in Bs, Mm and Go (Supplementary Table 7) indicates that formate (HCO2−) and nitrate (NO3−) anaerobic respiration may be possible.
We also discovered four highly expressed biomarkers (MODMU_0153, 5.83%; MODMU_0507, 5.41%; MODMU_1130, 3.92%; and MODMU_3547, 3.17%) of Mm, isolated from a white marble surface (Carrara, Tuscany, Italy) (Urzi et al., 2001) and predominant in the upper fraction (about 2 mm of stone surface) (Gtari et al., 2012; Supplementary Figure S2). Orthologs of these four highly expressed biomarkers are proteins implicated in the development of biofilms.
The outside of the stone has also been investigated (Urzi et al., 2001; Berdoulay and Salvado, 2009; Macedo et al., 2009). Growth on stone surfaces means either reliance on photosynthesis or on nutrients carried by the rain, air or through the stone itself. Concerning operons encoding genes for photosynthesis reactions, Go, isolated from soil of the Amargosa Desert (Nevada, USA) (Luedemann, 1968) contains three (Gobs_1696–Gobs_1703, Gobs_4550–Gobs_4544 and Gobs_4558–Gobs_4551) and Bs contains two (BLASA_0681 and BLASA_2555–BLASA_2552). Surprisingly, Mm contains only a single NADPH-ferredoxin reductase (fprA) gene (MODMU_0890). Two genes encoding ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenasewere identified only in Go (Gobs_1448, 0.03% and Gobs_2026), suggesting that the strain obtains both carbon and energy via carboxydotrophy. In addition, Go is characterized by the presence of DNA-related biomarkers including a highly expressed DNA-binding histone-like protein (Gobs_0298, 1.13%) (Supplementary Figure S2). In contrast to Mm, both Go and Bs have many similar highly expressed proteomic biomarkers such as a Dps-like iron-chelating protein (Gobs_3661 and BLASA_1121) that may limit, through the confinement of free iron, the Fenton-derived production of HO• (Williams et al., 2007; Confalonieri and Sommer, 2011). Yet, Bs has more highly expressed biomarkers associated with the production of ROS (Supplementary Figure 2)—cytochromes, flavoproteins and so on—representing a cellular benchmark for the proclivity of cells to resist to stress such as ionizing radiation (Ghosal et al. (2005) and references therein). Given this current state of affairs, it comes as no surprise that Bs is ROS and ionizing radiation sensitive (Gtari et al., 2012).
Rain is known to carry nitrogen compounds (Singh and Agrawal, 2008) such as nitric acid as well as traces of sulfur (Raybould et al., 1977). Besides glutamine synthetase and glutamate synthase for ammonium assimilation, the three genomes contain a conserved operon coding for an ammonium transporter (AmtB) and a nitrogen regulatory protein (GlnB) (Supplementary Table S7). Air carries numerous volatile organic compounds, prominent among which is CO (Austin et al., 2001). Study of the genomes revealed that Bs, Mm and Go have several copies of the coxLMS operon (Supplementary Table S7), which would help them oxidize CO. Such multiple copies (Wu et al., 2005) are always an indication of a strong selective pressure (Oda et al., 2005; Lee et al., 2009). Expression of the proteins—CO dehydrogenase subunits and acetyl-coenzyme A synthetase—(Supplementary Table S2) corresponding to some of the identified orthologous genes (Supplementary Table S7) of the Wood–Ljungdahl pathway has been detected under standard growth conditions of Bs and Go, suggesting metabolic utility of this pathway. Contrarily to CoxM and CoxL, acetyl-coenzyme A synthetase protein was not detected in Mm (Supplementary Table S2). Thus, the three strains inhabit exacting biotopes, which necessitate a rich array of transport systems, storage components, a motility machinery and energy-generating pathways (Figure 2). These biomarkers have shed new light on the microniche signature for each rock-dwelling terrabacteria.
Conclusion and perspectives
Here, the complete genome sequences of three Geodermatophilaceae members, Bs, Mm and Go, with contrasted physiologies and ecological microniches (Normand et al., 2014), together with the analysis of their proteomes under unstressed conditions, should help provide a solid foundation for investigating the varied strategies to adapt to their lifestyles. In particular, comparison of the three genomes provided an opportunity to analyze how Bs, Mm and Go can respond to stresses such as ROS mainly via pigmentation and catalase production and double-strand break through the non-homologous end joining pathway. Moreover, highly expressed proteomic biomarkers of Bs, Mm and Go were depicted. The identification of thse biomarkers have shed new light on the physiological and biochemical traits that are unique to each species and its ecological microniche. In particular, the Mm exoproteome was almost as dominant as the cellular proteome, which hinders a deeper proteomic view (Armengaud et al., 2012). Undoubtedly, much of the future progress in studying Bs, Mm and Go rests squarely on the shoulders of research performed with their stressed proteogenomes.
References
Ahrens R, Moll G . (1970). Ein neues knospendes Bakterium aus der Ostsee. [A new budding bacterium from the Baltic Sea]. Arch Mikrobiol 70: 243–265.
Armengaud J, Christie-Oleza JA, Clair G, Malard V, Duport C . (2012). Exoproteomics: exploring the world around biological systems. Expert Rev Proteomics 9: 561–575.
Austin CC, Wang D, Ecobichon DJ, Dussault G . (2001). Characterization of volatile organic compounds in smoke at experimental fires. J Toxicol Environ Health A 63: 191–206.
Battistuzzi FU, Feijao A, Hedges SB . (2004). A genomic timescale of prokaryote evolution: insights into the origin of methanogenesis, phototrophy, and the colonization of land. BMC Evol Biol 4: 44.
Battistuzzi FU, Hedges SB . (2009). A major clade of prokaryotes with ancient adaptations to life on land. Mol Biol Evol 26: 335–343.
Benzécri J-P . (1973) L'Analyse des Données Volume II. L'Analyse des Correspondances: Paris, France Dunod: Paris, France Dunod.
Berdoulay M, Salvado JC . (2009). Genetic characterization of microbial communities living at the surface of building stones. Lett Appl Microbiol 49: 311–316.
Buist G, Steen A, Kok J, Kuipers OP . (2008). LysM, a widely distributed protein motif for binding to (peptido)glycans. Mol Microbiol 68: 838–847.
Caspi R, Altman T, Dale JM, Dreher K, Fulcher CA, Gilham F et al. (2010). The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases. Nucleic Acids Res 38: D473–D479.
Chouaia B, Crotti E, Brusetti L, Daffonchio D, Essoussi I, Nouioui I et al. (2012). Genome sequence of Blastococcus saxobsidens DD2, a stone-inhabiting bacterium. J Bacteriol 194: 2752–2753.
Christie-Oleza JA, Armengaud J . (2010). In-depth analysis of exoproteomes from marine bacteria by shotgun liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: the Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3 case-study. Mar Drugs 8: 2223–2239.
Chuvochina MS, Marie D, Chevaillier S, Petit JR, Normand P, Alekhina IA et al. (2011). Community variability of bacteria in alpine snow (Mont Blanc) containing Saharan dust deposition and their snow colonisation potential. Microbes Environ 26: 237–247.
Clair G, Roussi S, Armengaud J, Duport C . (2010). Expanding the known repertoire of virulence factors produced by Bacillus cereus through early secretome profiling in three redox conditions. Mol Cell Proteomics 9: 1486–1498.
Confalonieri F, Sommer S . (2011). Bacterial and archaeal resistance to ionizing radiation. J Phys Conf Ser 26110.1088/1742-6596/1261/1081/012005.
Daly MJ . (2009). A new perspective on radiation resistance based on Deinococcus radiodurans. Nat Rev Microbiol 7: 237–245.
Daly MJ . (2011). Death by protein damage in irradiated cells. DNA Repair (Amst) 11: 12–21.
Daubin V, Ochman H . (2004). Bacterial genomes as new gene homes: the genealogy of ORFans in E. coli. Genome Res 14: 1036–1042.
Dedieu A, Gaillard JC, Pourcher T, Darrouzet E, Armengaud J . (2011). Revisiting iodination sites in thyroglobulin with an organ-oriented shotgun strategy. J Biol Chem 286: 259–269.
Eppard M, Krumbein WE, Koch C, Rhiel E, Staley JT, Stackebrandt E . (1996). Morphological, physiological, and molecular characterization of actinomycetes isolated from dry soil, rocks, and monument surfaces. Arch Microbiol 166: 12–22.
Essoussi I, Boujmil R, Nouioui I, Abbassi-Ghozzi I, Hamza A, Boudabous A et al. (2012). Genetic diversity and esterase-profiling of Actinobacteria isolated from Sahara desert stones and monuments. Geomicrobiol J 29: 23–28.
Essoussi I, Ghodhbane-Gtari F, Amairi H, Sghaier H, Jaouani A, Brusetti L et al. (2010). Esterase as an enzymatic signature of Geodermatophilaceae adaptability to Sahara desert stones and monuments. J Appl Microbiol 108: 1723–1732.
Friedmann EI, Ocampo-Friedmann RO . (1984). Endolithic microorganisms in extreme dry environments: analysis of a lithobiontic habitatIn: Klug MJ, Reddy CA (eds) Current Perspectives in Microbial Ecology. Proc. Third Internat. Symp. Microb. Ecol., Am. Soc. Microbiol.. Washington, DCpp 177–185.
Fukuchi S, Nishikawa K . (2004). Estimation of the number of authentic orphan genes in bacterial genomes. DNA Res 11: 219–231.
Ghosal D, Omelchenko MV, Gaidamakova EK, Matrosova VY, Vasilenko A, Venkateswaran A et al. (2005). How radiation kills cells: survival of Deinococcus radiodurans and Shewanella oneidensis under oxidative stress. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29: 361–375.
Gogarten JP, Doolittle WF, Lawrence JG . (2002). Prokaryotic evolution in light of gene transfer. Mol Biol Evol 19: 2226–2238.
Gtari M, Essoussi I, Maaoui R, Sghaier H, Boujmil R, Gury J et al. (2012). Contrasted resistance of stone-dwelling Geodermatophilaceae species to stresses known to give rise to reactive oxygen species. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 80: 566–577.
Hartmann EM, Allain F, Gaillard JC, Pible O, Armengaud J . (2014). Taking the shortcut for high-throughput shotgun proteomic analysis of bacteria. Methods Mol Biol 1197: 275–285.
Hartmann EM, Armengaud J . (2014). Shotgun proteomics suggests involvement of additional enzymes in dioxin degradation by Sphingomonas wittichii RW1. Environ Microbiol 16: 162–176.
Ishiguro EE, Wolfe RS . (1970). Control of morphogenesis in Geodermatophilus: ultrastructural studies. J Bacteriol 104: 566–580.
Ishiguro EE, Wolfe RS . (1974). Induction of morphogenesis in Geodermatophilus by inorganic cations and by organic nitrogenous cations. J Bacteriol 117: 189–195.
Ivanova N, Sikorski J, Jando M, Munk C, Lapidus A, Glavina Del Rio T et al. (2010). Complete genome sequence of Geodermatophilus obscurus type strain (G-20 T). Stand Genomic Sci 2: 158–167.
Jacob F . (1977). Evolution and tinkering. Science 196: 1161–1166.
Janssen PJ, Van Houdt R, Moors H, Monsieurs P, Morin N, Michaux A et al. (2010). The complete genome sequence of Cupriavidus metallidurans strain CH34, a master survivalist in harsh and anthropogenic environments. PLoS One 5: e10433.
Jaouani A, Neifar M, Hamza A, Chaabouni S, Martinez MJ, Gtari M . (2012). Purification and characterization of a highly thermostable esterase from the actinobacterium Geodermatophilus obscurus strain G20. J Basic Microbiol 52: 653–660.
Kuhlman KR, Fusco WG, La Duc MT, Allenbach LB, Ball CL, Kuhlman GM et al. (2006). Diversity of microorganisms within rock varnish in the Whipple Mountains, California. Appl Environ Microbiol 72: 1708–1715.
Langille MG, Brinkman FS . (2009). IslandViewer: an integrated interface for computational identification and visualization of genomic islands. Bioinformatics 25: 664–665.
Laubichler MD . (2007). Tinkering: a conceptual and historical evaluation. Novartis Found Symp 284: 20–29 discussion 29–34, 110–115.
Lee ZM, Bussema C 3rd, Schmidt TM . (2009). rrnDB: documenting the number of rRNA and tRNA genes in bacteria and archaea. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D489–D493.
Liu H, Sadygov RG, Yates JR 3rd . (2004). A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. Anal Chem 76: 4193–4201.
Liu R, Li K, Zhang H, Zhu J, Joshi D . (2014). Spatial distribution of microbial communities associated with dune landform in the Gurbantunggut Desert, China. J Microbiol 52: 898–907.
Luedemann GM . (1968). Geodermatophilus, a new genus of the Dermatophilaceae (Actinomycetales). J Bacteriol 96: 1848–1858.
Macedo MF, Miller AZ, Dionisio A, Saiz-Jimenez C . (2009). Biodiversity of cyanobacteria and green algae on monuments in the Mediterranean Basin: an overview. Microbiology 155: 3476–3490.
Marzan LW, Shimizu K . (2011). Metabolic regulation of Escherichia coli and its phoB and phoR genes knockout mutants under phosphate and nitrogen limitations as well as at acidic condition. Microb Cell Fact 10: 39.
Mevs U, Stackebrandt E, Schumann P, Gallikowski CA, Hirsch P . (2000). Modestobacter multiseptatus gen. nov., sp. nov., a budding actinomycete from soils of the Asgard Range (Transantarctic Mountains). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50: 337–346.
Montero-Calasanz MC, Goker M, Broughton WJ, Cattaneo A, Favet J, Potter G et al. (2013). Geodermatophilus tzadiensis sp. nov., a UV radiation-resistant bacterium isolated from sand of the Saharan desert. Syst Appl Microbiol 36: 177–182.
Montero-Calasanz MC, Goker M, Potter G, Rohde M, Sproer C, Schumann P et al. (2013a). Geodermatophilus africanus sp. nov., a halotolerant actinomycete isolated from Saharan desert sand. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 104: 207–216.
Montero-Calasanz MC, Goker M, Potter G, Rohde M, Sproer C, Schumann P et al. (2012). Geodermatophilus arenarius sp. nov., a xerophilic actinomycete isolated from Saharan desert sand in Chad. Extremophiles 16: 903–909.
Montero-Calasanz MC, Goker M, Potter G, Rohde M, Sproer C, Schumann P et al. (2013c). Geodermatophilus normandii sp. nov., isolated from Saharan desert sand. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63: 3437–3443.
Montero-Calasanz MC, Goker M, Potter G, Rohde M, Sproer C, Schumann P et al. (2013d). Geodermatophilus saharensis sp. nov., isolated from sand of the Saharan desert in Chad. Arch Microbiol 195: 153–159.
Montero-Calasanz MC, Goker M, Potter G, Rohde M, Sproer C, Schumann P et al. (2013e). Geodermatophilus telluris sp. nov., an actinomycete isolated from Saharan desert sand. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63: 2254–2259.
Montero-Calasanz MC, Goker M, Rohde M, Schumann P, Potter G, Sproer C et al. (2013f). Geodermatophilus siccatus sp. nov., isolated from arid sand of the Saharan desert in Chad. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 103: 449–456.
Montero-Calasanz MC, Hofner B, Goker M, Rohde M, Sproer C, Hezbri K et al. (2014). Geodermatophilus poikilotrophi sp. nov.: a multitolerant actinomycete isolated from dolomitic marble. Biomed Res Int 2014: 11.
Montero-Calasanz MD, Hezbri K, Goker M, Sghaier H, Rohde M, Sproer C et al. (2015). Description of gamma radiation-resistant Geodermatophilus dictyosporus sp. nov. to accommodate the not validly named Geodermatophilus obscurus subsp. dictyosporus (Luedemann, 1968). Extremophiles 19: 77–85.
Nijland R, Hall MJ, Burgess JG . (2010). Dispersal of biofilms by secreted, matrix degrading, bacterial DNase. PLoS One 5: e15668.
Normand P . (2006). Geodermatophilaceae fam. nov., a formal description. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56: 2277–2278.
Normand P, Daffonchio D, Gtari M . (2014) Family GeodermatophilaceaeIn: Rosenberg E (ed.) The prokaryotes – Actinobacteria. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Heidelberg: Berlin, Heidelberg.
Normand P, Gury J, Pujic P, Chouaia B, Crotti E, Brusetti L et al. (2012). Genome sequence of radiation-resistant Modestobacter marinus strain BC501, a representative actinobacterium that thrives on calcareous stone surfaces. J Bacteriol 194: 4773–4774.
Oda Y, Samanta SK, Rey FE, Wu L, Liu X, Yan T et al. (2005). Functional genomic analysis of three nitrogenase isozymes in the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodopseudomonas palustris. J Bacteriol 187: 7784–7794.
Overmars L, Kerkhoven R, Siezen RJ, Francke C . (2013). MGcV: the microbial genomic context viewer for comparative genome analysis. BMC Genomics 14: 209.
Paoletti AC, Parmely TJ, Tomomori-Sato C, Sato S, Zhu D, Conaway RC et al. (2006). Quantitative proteomic analysis of distinct mammalian Mediator complexes using normalized spectral abundance factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 18928–18933.
R Development Core Team. (2007) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna: Austria: Austria, http://www.R-project.org.
Rainey FA, Ray K, Ferreira M, Gatz BZ, Nobre MF, Bagaley D et al. (2005). Extensive diversity of ionizing-radiation-resistant bacteria recovered from Sonoran Desert soil and description of nine new species of the genus Deinococcus obtained from a single soil sample. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 5225–5235.
Raybould CC, Unsworth MH, Gregory PJ . (1977). Sources of sulphur in rain collected below a wheat canopy. Nature 267: 146–147.
Rousseau C, Gonnet M, Le Romancer M, Nicolas J . (2009). CRISPI: a CRISPR interactive database. Bioinformatics 25: 3317–3318.
Santos CL, Tavares F, Thioulouse J, Normand P . (2009). A phylogenomic analysis of bacterial helix-turn-helix transcription factors. FEMS Microbiol Rev 33: 411–429.
Sen A, Daubin V, Abrouk D, Gifford I, Berry AM, Normand P . (2014). The phylogeny of actinobacteria revisited in the light of complete genomes, the orders Frankiales and Micrococcales should be split into coherent entities. Proposal of Frankiales ord. nov., Geodermatophilales ord. nov., Acidothermales ord. nov. and Nakamurellales ord. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64: 3821–3832.
Singh A, Agrawal M . (2008). Acid rain and its ecological consequences. J Environ Biol 29: 15–24.
Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S . (2013). MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30: 2725–2729.
Tatusov RL, Natale DA, Garkavtsev IV, Tatusova TA, Shankavaram UT, Rao BS et al. (2001). The COG database: new developments in phylogenetic classification of proteins from complete genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 29: 22–28.
Tunnacliffe A, Lapinski J . (2003). Resurrecting Van Leeuwenhoek’s rotifers: a reappraisal of the role of disaccharides in anhydrobiosis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 358: 1755–1771.
Urzi C, Brusetti L, Salamone P, Sorlini C, Stackebrandt E, Daffonchio D . (2001). Biodiversity of Geodermatophilaceae isolated from altered stones and monuments in the Mediterranean basin. Environ Microbiol 3: 471–479.
Urzi C, Salamone P, Schumann P, Rohde M, Stackebrandt E . (2004). Blastococcus saxobsidens sp. nov., and emended descriptions of the genus Blastococcus Ahrens and Moll 1970 and Blastococcus aggregatus Ahrens and Moll 1970. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54: 253–259.
Vallenet D, Labarre L, Rouy Z, Barbe V, Bocs S, Cruveiller S et al. (2006). MaGe: a microbial genome annotation system supported by synteny results. Nucleic Acids Res 34: 53–65.
Vizcaino JA, Deutsch EW, Wang R, Csordas A, Reisinger F, Rios D et al. (2014). ProteomeXchange provides globally coordinated proteomics data submission and dissemination. Nat Biotechnol 32: 223–226.
Williams E, Lowe TM, Savas J, DiRuggiero J . (2007). Microarray analysis of the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus exposed to gamma irradiation. Extremophiles 11: 19–29.
Wu M, Ren Q, Durkin AS, Daugherty SC, Brinkac LM, Dodson RJ et al. (2005). Life in hot carbon monoxide: the complete genome sequence of Carboxydothermus hydrogenoformans Z-2901. PLoS Genet 1: e65.
Zhou J, Rudd KE . (2013). EcoGene 3.0. Nucleic Acids Res 41: D613–D624.
Zivanovic Y, Armengaud J, Lagorce A, Leplat C, Guerin P, Dutertre M et al. (2009). Genome analysis and genome-wide proteomics of Thermococcus gammatolerans, the most radioresistant organism known amongst the Archaea. Genome Biol 10: R70.
Acknowledgements
We thank Danis Abrouk (University of Lyon) for help with statistics. The support of the EU project BIODESERT (European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme CSA-SA REGPOT-2008-2 under grant agreement number 245746) is acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on The ISME Journal website
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sghaier, H., Hezbri, K., Ghodhbane-Gtari, F. et al. Stone-dwelling actinobacteria Blastococcus saxobsidens, Modestobacter marinus and Geodermatophilus obscurus proteogenomes. ISME J 10, 21–29 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.108
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.108
This article is cited by
-
aroF and cm2: potential molecular markers for the detection of stone-inhabiting Actinobacteria on cultural heritage sites
Archives of Microbiology (2023)
-
Genomic microbiome analyses of surface sand samples from the Kyzyl-Kum Desert (Uzbekistan): characterization and comparative study
Archives of Microbiology (2023)
-
Metagenomic insights into the microbial communities of inert and oligotrophic outdoor pier surfaces of a coastal city
Microbiome (2021)
-
Soil bacterial community structure of fog‐dependent Tillandsia landbeckii dunes in the Atacama Desert
Plant Systematics and Evolution (2021)
-
Klenkia terrae resistant to DNA extraction in germ-free mice stools illustrates the extraction pitfall faced by metagenomics
Scientific Reports (2020)