Original Article | Published:

Clinical Studies and Practice

Increasing low-energy-dense foods and decreasing high-energy-dense foods differently influence weight loss trial outcomes

International Journal of Obesity volume 42, pages 479486 (2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

Background/Objective:

Although reducing energy density (ED) enhances weight loss, it is unclear whether all dietary strategies that reduce ED are comparable, hindering effective ED guidelines for obesity treatment. This study examined how changes in number of low-energy-dense (LED) (<4.186 kJ/1.0 kcal g–1) and high-energy-dense (HED) (>12.56 kJ/3.0 kcal g–1) foods consumed affected dietary ED and weight loss within an 18-month weight loss trial.

Methods:

This secondary analysis examined data from participants randomized to an energy-restricted lifestyle intervention or lifestyle intervention plus limited non-nutrient dense, energy-dense food variety (n=183). Number of daily LED and HED foods consumed was calculated from three, 24-h dietary recalls and anthropometrics were measured at 0, 6 and 18 months. Multivariable-adjusted generalized linear models and repeated-measures mixed linear models examined associations between 6-month changes in number of LED and HED foods and changes in ED, body mass index (BMI), and percent weight loss at 6 and 18 months.

Results:

Among mostly female (58%), White (92%) participants aged 51.9 years following an energy-restricted diet, increasing number of LED foods or decreasing number of HED foods consumed was associated with 6- and 18-month reductions in ED (β=−0.25 to −0.38 kJ g–1 (−0.06 to −0.09 kcal g–1), P<0.001). Only increasing number of LED foods consumed was associated with 6- and 18-month reductions in BMI (β=−0.16 to −0.2 kg m2, P<0.05) and 6-month reductions in percent weight loss (β=−0.5%, P<0.05). Participants consuming 2 HED foods per day and 6.6 LED foods per day experienced better weight loss outcomes at 6- and 18-month than participants only consuming 2 HED foods per day.

Conclusion:

Despite similar reductions in ED from reducing number of HED foods or increasing number of LED foods consumed, only increasing number of LED foods related to weight loss. This provides preliminary evidence that methods used to reduce dietary ED may differentially influence weight loss trajectories. Randomized controlled trials are needed to inform ED recommendations for weight loss.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , , , . Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999-2010. JAMA 2012; 307: 491–497.

  2. 2.

    NCD Risk Factor Collaboration. Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19.2 million participants. Lancet 2016; 387: 1377–1396.

  3. 3.

    , , . When and why people die in the United States, 1990-2013. JAMA 2016; 315: 241.

  4. 4.

    , , , , , et al. Comparison of weight-loss diets with different compositions of fat, protein, and carbohydrates. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 859–873.

  5. 5.

    , , , , , et al. Maintenance of weight loss after lifestyle interventions for overweight and obesity, a systematic review. Obes Rev 2010; 11: 899–906.

  6. 6.

    , , , , Behavioural Weight Management Review Group. Effect of behavioural techniques and delivery mode on effectiveness of weight management: systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Obes Rev 2014; 15: 598–609.

  7. 7.

    , , , , , et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of long-term weight management schemes for adults: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2011; 15: 1–182.

  8. 8.

    , . Behavioral lifestyle intervention in the treatment of obesity. Health Serv Insights 2013; 6: 15–31.

  9. 9.

    . Control of food intake. A physiologically complex, motivated behavioral system. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1996; 25: 815–829.

  10. 10.

    , , . Energy density of foods: effects on energy intake. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2000; 40: 481–515.

  11. 11.

    , . Energy density and its role in the control of food intake: evidence from metabolic and community studies. Appetite 1996; 26: 153–174.

  12. 12.

    , . Dietary approaches to the treatment of obesity. Med Clin North Am 2000; 84: 401–418.

  13. 13.

    , . Energy density, energy intake, and body weight regulation in adults. Adv Nutr 2014; 5: 835–850.

  14. 14.

    . The relationship between dietary energy density and energy intake. Physiol Behav 2009; 97: 609–615.

  15. 15.

    , , , , . Dietary energy density in the treatment of obesity: a year-long trial comparing 2 weight-loss diets. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007; 85: 1465–1477.

  16. 16.

    , , , . Meal replacements, reduced energy density eating, and weight loss maintenance in primary care patients: a randomized controlled trial. Obesity 2014; 22: 94–100.

  17. 17.

    , , , , . The effects of an energy density prescription on diet quality and weight loss: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Acad Nutr Diet 2012; 112: 1397–1402.

  18. 18.

    , , , , , et al. Reductions in dietary energy density are associated with weight loss in overweight and obese participants in the PREMIER trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2007; 85: 1212–1221.

  19. 19.

    , , , , , et al. Dietary energy density determined by eight calculation methods in a nationally representative United States population. J Nutr 2005; 135: 273–278.

  20. 20.

    , , . Number of foods available at a meal determines the amount consumed. Eat Behav 2012; 13: 183–187.

  21. 21.

    , , , , , et al. Frequency of consuming foods predicts changes in cravings for those foods during weight loss: the POUNDS lost study. Obesity 2017; 25: 1343–1348.

  22. 22.

    , , , , , . Increased fruit and vegetable intake has no discernible effect on weight loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 2014; 100: 567–576.

  23. 23.

    , , , , . Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of increased vegetable and fruit consumption on body weight and energy intake. BMC Public Health 2014; 14: 886.

  24. 24.

    , , , . Evaluation of simulation models that estimate the effect of dietary strategies on nutritional intake: a systematic review. J Nutr 2017; 147: 908–931.

  25. 25.

    , , , , . Limiting variety in non-nutrient-dense, energy-dense foods during a lifestyle intervention: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2012; 95: 1305–1314.

  26. 26.

    , , , , , et al. Link between food energy density and body weight changes in obese adults. Nutrients 2016; 8: 229.

  27. 27.

    , , , , , et al. Lipolysis and thermogenesis in adipose tissues as new potential mechanisms for metabolic benefits of dietary fiber. Nutrition 2017; 33: 118–124.

  28. 28.

    . Dietary fiber and body weight. Nutrition 2005; 21: 411–418.

  29. 29.

    , . Dietary energy density and weight regulation. Nutr Rev 2001; 59: 247–258.

  30. 30.

    , , . Behavioral economics and the supplemental nutrition assistance program. Am J Prev Med 2017; 52: S145–S150.

  31. 31.

    , , . Effect of limiting snack food variety on long-term sensory-specific satiety and monotony during obesity treatment. Eat Behav 2006; 7: 1–14.

  32. 32.

    , . Diet quality-the Greeks had it right!. Nutrients 2016; 8: 636.

  33. 33.

    , , , . Dietary energy density and obesity: how consumption patterns differ by body weight status. Eur J Nutr 2016. e-pub ahead of print 13 October 2016; e-pub ahead of print 13 October 2016; .

  34. 34.

    . The psychology of food craving. Proc Nutr Soc 2007; 66: 277–285.

  35. 35.

    , . Role of the hypothalamus in the neuroendocrine regulation of body weight and composition during energy deficit. Obes Rev 2012; 13: 234–257.

  36. 36.

    , , , . The dietary variety score: assessing diet quality in healthy young and older adults. J Am Diet Assoc 1997; 97: 266–271.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA

    • M Vadiveloo
    •  & H Parker
  2. Department of Nutrition, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA

    • H Raynor

Authors

  1. Search for M Vadiveloo in:

  2. Search for H Parker in:

  3. Search for H Raynor in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M Vadiveloo.

Supplementary information

Word documents

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Table 1

About this article

Publication history

Received

Revised

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2017.303

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on International Journal of Obesity website (http://www.nature.com/ijo)