Original Article

Obese and overweight individuals are less sensitive to information about meal times in portion-size judgements

  • International Journal of Obesity volume 42, pages 905910 (2018)
  • doi:10.1038/ijo.2017.275
  • Download Citation
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:

Abstract

Background:

Obesity is related to a tendency to discount the future. Information regarding inter-meal interval (IMI) allows meal planning. We sought to assess how obese, overweight and lean people select portion sizes based on the length of an IMI. We hypothesised that individuals with a high body mass index (BMI) would discount information about the IMI. In addition, we investigated how reduced sensitivity to IMIs relates to monetary temporal discounting.

Methods:

Participants (lean, n=35; overweight, n=31; obese, n=22) selected lunchtime portion sizes in response to information about the timings of their next meal. In seven trials, the time of the IMI was systematically manipulated, ranging from ‘right now’ to ‘8 h’. Participants then completed a monetary temporal discounting task. BMI was included as a continuous measure. For each participant, we conducted a linear regression of portion size on IMI to yield a gradient that reflected reduced sensitivity to future meal timings.

Results:

As expected, participants selected larger portion sizes in response to a long IMI. Consistent with our hypothesis, individuals with a high BMI discounted information about the IMI (β=−3.49, P=0.015; confidence interval (CI) 6.29 to −0.70). Monetary discounting also negatively predicted BMI (β=−8.1, P=0.003; CI=−13.43 to −2.77), but did not correlate with IMI sensitivity (P>0.05).

Conclusions:

These results are the first to demonstrate that temporal discounting operates in planning from one meal to the next, and is more prevalent in obese and overweight, relative to lean individuals. Participants with a high BMI discounted concerns about potential future fullness and hunger in the IMI. Our observations might begin to explain associations between obesity and irregular meal timings or help to form the basis for a targeted intervention that promotes future thinking in meal planning.

  • Subscribe to International Journal of Obesity for full access:

    $652

    Subscribe

Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

References

  1. 1.

    , , , , . Psychiatric aspects of impulsivity. Am J Psychiatry 2001; 158: 1783–1793.

  2. 2.

    , , . Delay discounting moderates the effect of food reinforcement on energy intake among non-obese women. Appetite 2010; 55: 420–425.

  3. 3.

    , , , , , et al. Neuropsychological assessment as a predictor of weight loss in obese adolescents. Int J Obes (Lond) 2014; 38: 507–512.

  4. 4.

    , , , , , et al. Impulsivity toward food reward is related to BMI: Evidence from intertemporal choice in obese and normal-weight individuals. Brain Cogn 2016; 110: 112–119.

  5. 5.

    , , , . Obese women show greater delay discounting than healthy-weight women. Appetite 2008; 51: 563–569.

  6. 6.

    , , , , . Discounting of various types of rewards by women with and without binge eating disorder: evidence for general rather than specific differences. Psychol Rec 2011; 61: 561–582.

  7. 7.

    , , , , , et al. Impulsivity in disorders of food and drug misuse. Psychol Med 2015; 45: 771–782.

  8. 8.

    , , . Percent body fat is related to delay and probability discounting for food in humans. Behav Processes 2010; 83: 23–30.

  9. 9.

    , , , . The role of impulsivity traits and delayed reward discounting in dysregulated eating and drinking among heavy drinkers. Appetite 2014; 80: 81–88.

  10. 10.

    , , , , . Greater impulsivity is associated with decreased brain activation in obese women during a delay discounting task. Brain Imaging Behav 2013; 7: 116–128.

  11. 11.

    , , . Measurement and validation of measures for impulsive food choice across obese and healthy-weight individuals. Appetite 2015; 90: 254–263.

  12. 12.

    , , , , , et al. Insulin, central dopamine D2 receptors, and monetary reward discounting in obesity. PLoS ONE 2015; 10: e0133621.

  13. 13.

    , , , , , et al. Delay discounting and intake of ready-to-eat and away-from-home foods in overweight and obese women. Appetite 2012; 59: 576–584.

  14. 14.

    , . Temporal discounting: basic research and the analysis of socially important behavior. J Appl Behav Anal 2001; 34: 101–122.

  15. 15.

    , , , , . Unhealthy diets, obesity and time discounting: a systematic literature review and network analysis. Obes Rev 2016; 17: 810–819.

  16. 16.

    , , . Discounting of delayed hypothetical money and food: Effects of amount. Behav Processes 2006; 73: 278–284.

  17. 17.

    , . Discounting of delayed hypothetical money, alcohol, and food. Behav Processes 2003; 64: 305–313.

  18. 18.

    , . Commodity specific rates of temporal discounting: does metabolic function underlie differences in rates of discounting? Behav Processes 2008; 77: 334–342.

  19. 19.

    , , , , . Steep discounting of delayed monetary and food rewards in obesity: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2016; 46: 2423–2434.

  20. 20.

    , , . Eating on impulse: the relation between overweight and food-specific inhibitory control. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2014; 22: E6–E8.

  21. 21.

    , , . Time orientation and eating behavior: unhealthy eaters consider immediate consequences, while healthy eaters focus on future health. Appetite 2015; 91: 13–19.

  22. 22.

    , , , , , et al. “What time is my next meal?” delay-discounting individuals choose smaller portions under conditions of uncertainty. Appetite 2017; 116: 284–290.

  23. 23.

    , , . Dietary and physical activity behaviors among adults successful at weight loss maintenance. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2006; 3: 17.

  24. 24.

    , , , , , . What determines real-world meal size? Evidence for pre-meal planning. Appetite 2011; 56: 284–289.

  25. 25.

    , . Super bowls: Serving bowl size and food consumption. JAMA 2005; 293: 1723–1728.

  26. 26.

    , , , , , . Computer-based assessments of expected satiety predict behavioural measures of portion-size selection and food intake. Appetite 2012; 59: 933–938.

  27. 27.

    , , . Measuring ‘expected satiety’ in a range of common foods using a method of constant stimuli. Appetite 2008; 51: 604–614.

  28. 28.

    , . How many calories are on our plate? Expected fullness, not liking, determines meal-size selection. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009; 17: 1884–1890.

  29. 29.

    , , . Delay discounting: concepts and measures. Psychol Neurosci 2012; 5: 135–146.

  30. 30.

    , . The psychology of impulse buying: an integrative self-regulation approach. J Consumer Policy 2011; 34: 197–20.

  31. 31.

    , , . Perceived volume, expected satiation, and the energy content of self-selected meals. Appetite 2010; 55: 25–29.

  32. 32.

    , , . Cross-cultural comparisons of discounting delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychol Rec 2002; 52: 479–492.

  33. 33.

    , , . Area under the curve as a measure of discounting. J Exp Anal Behav 2001; 76: 235–243.

  34. 34.

    , . The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. J Psychosom Res 1985; 29: 71–83.

  35. 35.

    , , , , , et al. Large portions encourage the selection of palatable rather than filling foods. J Nutr 2016; 146: 2117–2123.

  36. 36.

    , . Effects of mindful eating training on delay and probability discounting for food and money in obese and healthy-weight individuals. Behav Res Ther 2013; 51: 399–409.

  37. 37.

    , , . The future is now: comparing the effect of episodic future thinking on impulsivity in lean and obese individuals. Appetite 2013; 71: 120–125.

  38. 38.

    , , , , . Intuitive eating is associated with interoceptive sensitivity. Effects on body mass index. Appetite 2013; 70: 22–30.

  39. 39.

    . Obesity and the denial of hunger. Psychosom Med 1959; 21: 281–290.

  40. 40.

    , . Attenuated interoceptive sensitivity in overweight and obese individuals. Eat Behav 2014; 15: 445–448.

  41. 41.

    , , . Gastric distention by balloon and test-meal intake in obese and lean subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 1988; 48: 592–594.

  42. 42.

    , , . Deleterious effects of omitting breakfast on insulin sensitivity and fasting lipid profiles in healthy lean women. Am J Clin Nutr 2005; 81: 388–396.

  43. 43.

    , , , . Low social support level is associated with non-adherence to diet at 1-year in the family intervention trial for heart health (FIT Heart). J Nutr Educ Behav 2010; 42: 380–388.

  44. 44.

    , . Obesity management: attitudes and practices of French general practitioners in a region of France. Int J Obes 2005; 29: 1100–1106.

  45. 45.

    , , , . Adherence to protein restriction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized trial. Eur J Clin Nutr 2000; 54: 347–352.

  46. 46.

    , , , , , et al. Impulse control in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex counteracts post-diet weight regain in obesity. Neuroimage 2015; 109: 318–327.

  47. 47.

    , , , . Focus on the future: episodic future thinking reduces discount rate and snacking. Appetite 2016; 96: 327–332.

  48. 48.

    , . How many impulsivities? A discounting perspective. J Exp Anal Behav 2013; 99: 3–13.

  49. 49.

    , , . Reliability and validity of digital imaging as a measure of schoolchildren's fruit and vegetable consumption. J Acad Nutr Diet 2014; 114: 1359–1366.

  50. 50.

    , , , . A photographic method to measure food item intake. Validation in geriatric institutions. Appetite 2015; 84: 11–19.

  51. 51.

    , , , . Underreporting of energy intake in repeated 24-hour recalls related to gender, age, weight status, day of interview, educational level, reported food intake, smoking habits and area of living. Public Health Nutr 2001; 4: 919–927.

  52. 52.

    , . Underreporting of energy intake among Japanese women aged 18-20 years and its association with reported nutrient and food group intakes. Public Health Nutr 2004; 7: 911–917.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Work conducted at the University of Bristol was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC, grant references BB/ I012370/1 and BB/J00562/1). The research of Brunstrom, Rogers and Zimmerman is currently supported by the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013, under Grant Agreement 607310 (Nudge-it)).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Nutrition and Behaviour Unit, School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

    • A R Zimmerman
    • , A Mason
    • , P J Rogers
    •  & J M Brunstrom
  2. The University of Western Australia, WA, Australia

    • A Mason

Authors

  1. Search for A R Zimmerman in:

  2. Search for A Mason in:

  3. Search for P J Rogers in:

  4. Search for J M Brunstrom in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A R Zimmerman.