Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Journals should no longer accept ‘obesity paradox’ articles

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. Banack HR, Stokes A . The 'obesity paradox' may not be a paradox at all. Int J Obes 2017; 41: 1162–1163.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Banack HR, Kaufman JS . From bad to worse: collider stratification amplifies confounding bias in the ‘obesity paradox’. Eur J Epidemiol 2015; 30: 1111–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Banack HR, Kaufman JS . The ‘obesity paradox’ explained. Epidemiology 2013; 24: 461–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Banack HR, Kaufman JS . The obesity paradox: understanding the effect of obesity on mortality among individuals with cardiovascular disease. Prev Med 2014; 62: 96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mariscalco G, Wozniak MJ, Dawson AG, Serraino GF, Porter R, Nath M et al. Body mass index and mortality among adults undergoing cardiac surgery: a nationwide study with a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation 2017; 135: 850–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang L, Liu W, He X, Chen Y, Lu J, Liu K et al. Association of overweight and obesity with patient mortality after acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int J Obes 2016; 40: 220–228.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, O. E. P. Executive summary: Guidelines (2013) for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Obesity Society published by the Obesity Society and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Based on a systematic review from the The Obesity Expert Panel, 2013. Obesity 2014; 22 Suppl 2: S5–39.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kritchevsky SB, Beavers KM, Miller ME, Shea MK, Houston DK, Kitzman DW et al. Intentional weight loss and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0121993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Look Ahead Research Group. Cardiovascular effects of intensive lifestyle intervention in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA et al. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 393–403.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Thanks to Janitha Hettiarachchi and Jonathan Shaw for useful discussions on this issue. Anna Peeters is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Career Development Award.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Peeters.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peeters, A. Journals should no longer accept ‘obesity paradox’ articles. Int J Obes 42, 584–585 (2018).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

Further reading


Quick links