Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Is the ratio waist circumference to height (WHtR) of 0.5 a universal measure for abdominal adiposity in children and adolescents?

In the January issue of the Journal, Inokuchi et al.1 published reference values for waist circumference-to-height ratio (WHtR) for Japanese children and adolescents. They recommend age- and sex-specific reference values and preclude the use of a universal cutoff of 0.5, which was proposed by McCarthy and Ashwell (‘keep your waist circumference to less than half of your height’) for adults and children of both sexes and all ages.2

Based on our reference values from 22 113 German children and adolescents aged 3–18 years we would like to support the use of age- and sex-specific WHtR: As displayed in Figure 1, the ten percentile curves between the 3rd and 97th percentiles demonstrate substantial variance by age, sex and WHtR percentile, starting with 0.45 for the 3rd percentile and with 0.56 for the 97th percentile in both genders. Ethnicity should be added as a fourth variable, as displayed by the disparate shapes of the nine percentile curves of the 6−18-year-old Japanese youths.1

Figure 1
figure 1

Waist circumference-to-height ratio percentile curves for the 3rd, 5th, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 85th, 95th and 97th percentiles for males and females aged 3–18 years.

As shown in Table 1, median WHtR value was 0.509 among 3-year-old children, which decreased continuously in boys until 14 years (0.462) and in girls until 13 years (0.424), whereas at the beginning of overweight (85th percentile) 3-year-old boys had a median WHtR value of 0.546 and girls 0.548, which continuously decreased to 0.482 at 15 years in boys and to 0.479 at 11 years in girls. Among severely obese children (97th percentile), at 3 years boys had a median WHtR value of 0.583, with a nadir of 0.549 at 12 years and a re-increase to 0.562 at age 18, while girls started with 0.587, with a nadir of 0.536 at 8 years and a maximum of 0.597 at 18 years.

Table 1 Values for Box−Cox power L, the adjusted mean M and the coefficient of variation S, and the percentiles for 22 113 German males and females aged 3−18 years, based on the 1993−2007 surveys

Median WHtR was higher in German boys and girls (0.46 and 0.46, respectively, at 6 years; 0.43 and 0.44, respectively, at 18 years) compared with Japanese boys and girls (0.44 and 0.43, respectively, at 6 years; 0.44 and 0.40, respectively, at 18 years). These disparities increased in both genders, with increasing overweight and obesity at the 95th percentile at age 6 years being 0.53 among German boys and girls compared with 0.49 and 0.48, respectively, in their Japanese counterparts, and 0.53 and 0.63, respectively, in 18-year-old males and females in Germany vs 0.49 and 0.45 in Japanese adolescents. The prevalence of abdominal adiposity defined by WHtR 0.5 was 18.7%/1.9% in 6−17-year-old Japanese males/females and 11.6%/11.2% in German males/females. At the 85th, 90th, 95th and 97th percentiles the prevalence for Japanese boys/girls was 56.0/24.5, 42.4/17, 25.4/10.1 and 16.0%/6.9% and that in German boys/girls 0.4/0.2, 35.3/27.6,100/95.3 and 100%/100%, respectively.

Overall, WHtR is considerably higher in German than in Japanese children and adolescents, which is consistent with the lower waist circumference (WC) values in Japanese youth.3 At the 90th percentile (recommended by the International Diabetes Federation as a cutoff for the new definition of the metabolic syndrome in young people4) the comparison of age- and gender-specific WC percentiles among youth from 12 countries demonstrates strong disparities up to 21 cm in boys and 25 cm in girls.3

References

  1. Inokuchi M, Matsuo N, Takayama JI, Hasegawa JIT . Waist-to-height ratio centiles by age and sex for Japanese children based on the 1978–1981 cross-sectional national survey data. Int J Obesity 2016; 40: 65–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McCarthy HD, Ashwell M . A study of central fatness using waist-to-height ratios in UK children and adolescents over two decades supports the simple message—'keep your waist circumference to less than half your height'. Int J Obes (Lond) 2006; 30: 988–992.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schwandt P, Haas GM . Reference curves of waist circumference in children and adolescents 2012, Part 13. In: VR Preedy (ed). Handbook of Anthropometry. Springer Science Business Media, LLC: London, UK, 2012, pp 1405−1412.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Zimmet P, Alberti G, Kaufman F, Tajima N, Silink M, Arsolanian S et al. on behalf of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention of Diabetes. The metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents. Lancet 2007; 369: 2059–2061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P Schwandt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schwandt, P., Haas, GM. Is the ratio waist circumference to height (WHtR) of 0.5 a universal measure for abdominal adiposity in children and adolescents?. Int J Obes 40, 1141–1142 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2016.51

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2016.51

Further reading

Search

Quick links