Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Short Communication
  • Published:

Obesity and developmental delay in a patient with uniparental disomy of chromosome 2

Abstract

Objective:

Uniparental disomy (UPD) is an unusual situation wherein two homologous chromosomes are inherited from the same parent. UPDs can cause clinical abnormalities owing to the aberrant dosage of genes regulated by epigenetic imprinting or homozygosity of variants for recessive phenotypes. The aim of this study was to identify the genetic cause of the obesity and developmental delay phenotype in a 3-year-old Chinese boy.

Study Design:

Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) was used for detecting potential copy number variations (CNVs) and homozygous segments. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) identified sequence variants. Sanger sequencing further confirmed the variants in GPBAR1 and CAPN10 both in the patient and the parents.

Results:

No clinically significant CNVs were identified by CMA but a complete UPD of chromosome 2 (UPD2) was revealed in the patient. WES identified a total of 13 rare homozygous single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) on chromosome 2. Among the 13 SNVs, a nonsense variation in GPBAR1 (c.753T>G; p.Y251*) and a missense variation in CAPN10 (c.413C>T; p.S138F) were evaluated as candidate disease-causing variants based on their functional impacts to their respective protein and the biological relevance of the genes to the clinical presentation of our patient. Both GPBAR1 and CAPN10 variants were detected in the patient’s mother in a heterozygous state, indicating that the patient had maternal UPD2. No other clinically relevant variants were identified.

Conclusions:

Homozygosity of rare recessive variations caused by UPD2 likely contributed to the phenotypes of our patient. Based on emerging evidence, the nonsense variation in GPBAR1 and the missense variation in CAPN10 are considered as causally related to our patient’s phenotype, that is, obesity and delayed development, respectively. The present study further supports the role of GPBAR1 in obesity and the role of calpain-10 in neurological function.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Engel E . A new genetic concept: uniparental disomy and its potential effect, isodisomy. Am J Med Genet 1980; 6: 137–143.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kotzot D, Utermann G . Uniparental disomy (UPD) other than 15: phenotypes and bibliography updated. Am J Med Genet 2005; 136: 287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Robinson WP . Mechanisms leading to uniparental disomy and their clinical consequences. Bioessays 2000; 22: 452–459.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Spence JE, Perciaccante RG, Greig GM, Willard HF, Ledbetter DH, Hejtmancik JF et al. Uniparental disomy as a mechanism for human genetic disease. Am J Hum Genet 1988; 42: 217–226.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bakker B, Bikker H, Hennekam RC, Lommen EJ, Schipper MG, Vulsma T et al. Maternal isodisomy for chromosome 2p causing severe congenital hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001; 86: 1164–1168.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Herzfeld T, Wolf N, Winter P, Hackstein H, Vater D, Müller U . Maternal uniparental heterodisomy with partial isodisomy of a chromosome 2 carrying a splice acceptor site mutation (IVS9-2A>T) in ALS2 causes infantile onset ascending spastic paralysis (IAHSP). Neurogenetics 2009; 10: 59–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Castiglia D, Castori M, Pisaneschi E, Sommi M, Covaciu C, Zambruno G et al. Trisomic rescue causing reduction to homozygosity for a novel ABCA12 mutation in harlequin ichthyosis. Clin Genet 2009; 76: 392–397.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Baskin B, Geraghty M, Ray PN . Paternal isodisomy of chromosome 2 as a cause of long chain 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase (LCHAD) deficiency. Am J Med Genet A 2010; 152A: 1808–1811.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kantarci S, Ragge NK, Thomas NS, Robinson DO, Noonan KM, Russell MK et al. Donnai-Barrow syndrome (DBS/FOAR) in a child with a homozygous LRP2 mutation due to complete chromosome 2 paternal isodisomy. Am J Med Genet A 2008; 146A: 1842–1847.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Douglas GV, Wiszniewska J, Lipson MH, Witt DR, McDowell T, Sifry-Platt M et al. Detection of uniparental isodisomy in autosomal recessive mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome by high-density SNP array analysis. J Hum Genet 2011; 56: 834–839.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nygren AO, Ameziane N, Duarte HM, Vijzelaar RN, Waisfisz Q, Hess CJ et al. Methylation-specific MLPA (MS-MLPA): Simultaneous detection of CpG methylation and copy number changes of up to 40 sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33: e128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Conlin LK, Thiel BD, Bonnemann CG, Medne L, Ernst L, Zackai E et al. Mechanisms of mosaicism, chimerism, and uniparental disomy identified by SNP array analysis. Hum Mol Genet 2010; 19: 1263–1275.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Carmichael H, Shen Y, Nguyen TT, Hirschhorn JN, Dauber A . Whole exome sequencing in a patient with uniparental disomy of chromosome 2 and a complex phenotype. Clin Genet 2013; 84: 213–222.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ball RS . The Gesell Developmental Schedules: Arnold Gesell (1880-1961). J Abnorm Child Psychol 1977; 5: 233–239.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods 2010; 7: 248–249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng PC . Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc 2009; 4: 1073–1081.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Choi Y, Chan AP . PROVEAN web server: a tool to predict the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels. Bioinformatics 2015; 31: 2745–2747.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bernasconi F, Karaguzel A, Celep F, Keser I, Lüleci G, Dutly F et al. Normal phenotype with maternal isodisomy in a female with two isochromosomes: i(2p) and i(2q). Am J Hum Genet 1996; 59: 1114–1118.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Keller MC, McRae AF, McGaughran JM, Visscher PM, Martin NG, Montgomery GW . Non-pathological paternal isodisomy of chromosome 2 detected from a genome-wide SNP scan. Am J Med Genet A 2009; 149A: 1823–1826.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Albrecht B, Mergenthaler S, Eggermann K, Zerres K, Passarge E, Eggermann T . Uniparental isodisomy for paternal 2p and maternal 2q in a phenotypically normal female with two isochromosomes, i(2p) and i(2q). J Med Genet 2001; 38: 214.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stratakis CA, Taymans SE, Schteingart D, Haddad BR . Segmental uniparental isodisomy (UPD) for 2p16 without clinical symptoms: implications for UPD and other genetic studies of chromosome 2. J Med Genet 2001; 38: 106–109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med 2015; 17: 405–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kawamata Y, Fujii R, Hosoya M, Harada M, Yoshida H, Miwa M et al. A G protein-coupled receptor responsive to bile acids. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 9435–9440.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Poole DP, Godfrey C, Cattaruzza F, Cottrell GS, Kirkland JG, Pelayo JC et al. Expression and function of the bileacid receptor GpBAR1 (TGR5) in the murine enteric nervous system. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2010; 22: 814–825; e227–e228.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Keitel V, Görg B, Bidmon HJ, Zemtsova I, Spomer L, Zilles K et al. The bile acid receptor TGR5 (Gpbar-1) acts as a neurosteroid receptor in brain. Glia 2010; 58: 1794–1805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kumar DP, Rajagopal S, Mahavadi S, Mirshahi F, Grider JR, Murthy KS et al. Activation of transmembrane bile acidreceptor TGR5 stimulates insulin secretion in pancreatic β cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2012; 427: 600–605.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lavoie B, Balemba OB, Godfrey C, Watson CA, Vassileva G, Corvera CU et al. Hydrophobic bile salts inhibit gallbladder smooth muscle function via stimulation of GPBAR1 receptors and activation of KATP channels. J Physiol 2010; 588: 3295–3305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Maruyama T, Tanaka K, Suzuki J, Miyoshi H, Harada N, Nakamura T et al. Targeted disruption of G protein-coupled bile acid receptor 1 (Gpbar1/M-Bar) in mice. J Endocrinol 2006; 191: 197–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Watanabe M, Houten SM, Mataki C, Christoffolete MA, Kim BW, Sato H et al. Bile acids induce energy expenditure by promoting intracellular thyroid hormone activation. Nature 2006; 439: 484–489.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hov JR, Keitel V, Laerdahl JK, Spomer L, Ellinghaus E, ElSharawy A et al. Mutational characterization of the bile acid receptor TGR5 in primary sclerosing cholangitis. PLoS One 2010; 5: e12403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hov JR, Keitel V, Schrumpf E, Häussinger D, Karlsen TH . TGR5 sequence variation in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Dig Dis 2011; 29: 78–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Brown AE, Yeaman SJ, Walker M . Targeted suppression of Calpain-10 expression impairs insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in cultured primary human skeletal muscle cells. Mol Genet Metab 2007; 91: 318–324.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Arrington DD, Van Vleet TR, Schnellmann RG . Calpain 10: a mitochondrial calpain and its role in calcium-induced mitochondrial dysfunction. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2006; 291: C1159–C1171.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Johnson JD, Han Z, Otani K, Ye H, Zhang Y, Wu H et al. RyR2 and Calpain-10 delineate a novel apoptosis pathway in pancreatic islets. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 24794–24802.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Paul DS, Harmon AW, Winston CP, Patel YM . Calpain facilitates GLUT4 vesicle translocation during insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in adipocytes. Biochem J 2003; 376: 625–632.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Horikawa Y, Oda N, Cox NJ, Li X, Orho-Melander M, Hara M et al. Genetic variation in the gene encoding Calpain-10 is associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Genet 2000; 26: 163–175.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hanis CL, Boerwinkle E, Chakraborty R, Ellsworth DL, Concannon P, Stirling B et al. A genome-wide search for human non-insulin-dependent (type 2) diabetes genes reveals a major susceptibility locus on chromosome 2. Nat Genet 1996; 13: 161–166.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Oladnabi M, Musante L, Larti F, Hu H, Abedini SS, Wienker T et al. New evidence for the role of calpain 10 in autosomal recessive intellectual disability: identification of two novel nonsense variants by exome sequencing in Iranian families. Arch Iran Med 2015; 18: 179–184.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Najmabadi H, Hu H, Garshasbi M, Zemojtel T, Abedini SS, Chen W et al. Deep sequencing reveals 50 novel genes for recessive cognitive disorders. Nature 2011; 478: 57–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Wu HY, Lynch DR . Calpain and Synaptic Function. Mol Neurobiol 2006; 33: 215–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the members of the family for their participation in this study. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 81472051 and 81371903), Project of Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission (Grant No. 15410722800) and Project of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission- Gaofeng Clinical Medicine (Grant No. 20152529).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to X Wang or J Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, T., Li, J., Li, N. et al. Obesity and developmental delay in a patient with uniparental disomy of chromosome 2. Int J Obes 40, 1935–1941 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2016.160

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2016.160

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links