Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Objective measures are complementary to, rather than a replacement for, self-reported methods

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. Dhurandhar NV, Schoeller D, Brown AW, Heymsfield SB, Thomas D, Sorensen TI et al. Energy balance measurement: when something is not better than nothing. Int J Obes (Lond) 2014. e-pub ahead of print 13 November 2014; doi:10.1038/ijo.2014.199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hill JO, Wyatt HR, Peters JC . Energy balance and obesity. Circulation 2012; 126: 126–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hall KD, Heymsfield SB, Kemnitz JW, Klein S, Schoeller DA, Speakman JR . Energy balance and its components: implications for body weight regulation. Am J Clin Nutr 2012; 95: 989–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Plasqui G, Bonomi AG, Westerterp KR . Daily physical activity assessment with accelerometers: new insights and validation studies. Obes Rev 2013; 14: 451–462.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Willett W . Nutritional Epidemiology 3rd edn Oxford University Press: New York, USA, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Freedman LS, Commins JM, Moler JE, Arab L, Baer DJ, Kipnis V et al. Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for energy and protein intake. Am J Epidemiol 2014; 180: 172–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Satija A, Yu E, Willett WC, Hu FB . Understanding nutritional epidemiology and its role in policy. Adv Nutr 2015; 6: 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by NIH grants HL60712, DK58845, P30 DK46200 and U54CA155626.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F B Hu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Satija, A., Yu, E., Willett, W. et al. Objective measures are complementary to, rather than a replacement for, self-reported methods. Int J Obes 39, 1179 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2015.80

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2015.80

Further reading

Search

Quick links