Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Food advertising, children’s food choices and obesity: interplay of cognitive defences and product evaluation: an experimental study

International Journal of Obesity volume 40, pages 581–586 (2016)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Objectives:

To investigate the role of product evaluations, nutritional and persuasion knowledge on children’s food choices conducted because of limited evidence about the role of product evaluations on consumer choices in conjunction with cognitive defences.

Design:

A randomised controlled 2 × 2 factorial experiment with an exposure to a food and a control (toy) advertisement conducted in a non-laboratory setting at an annual event traditionally visited by families.

Subjects:

Children aged 7–13 years with biometric/weight data representative of the general Australian population.

Measurements:

Height and weight (converted into body mass index z-scores) measured in addition to children’s nutritional and persuasion knowledge, product evaluations, age and gender.

Results:

The factors that undermine children’s cognitive defences relate to taste, social appeal of foods and low nutritional and persuasion knowledge. An interplay between the above-mentioned factors was also observed, identifying four groups among young consumers, alluding to a complex and at times impulsive nature of children’s decisions: (1) knowledgeable children with less positive product evaluations choosing a healthy snack; (2) knowledgeable but hedonism-oriented children seeking peer conformity choosing an advertised product; (3) knowledgeable children who chose a snack belonging to the same product category; and (4) less knowledgeable children with positive product evaluations and low nutritional knowledge choosing snacks from the advertised product category. Obese children were more likely to belong to a cluster of less knowledgeable and hedonism-oriented children.

Conclusions:

The problem of consumption of less healthy foods is complex and multiple factors need to be considered by health practitioners, social marketers and parents to address the issue of childhood obesity. Nutritional knowledge alone is not sufficient to ensure children make healthier food choices and emphasis should also be placed on persuasion knowledge education, targeting of peer norms, self-efficacy and stricter regulation of advertising aimed at children.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Dietary Guidelines for Americans. United States Department of Health and Human Services: Washington, DC, USA, 2010.

  2. Koplan JP, Liverman CT, Kraak VA . Preventing Childhood Obesity: Health in the Balance. National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Livingstone S, Helsper E . Advertising Foods to Children: Understanding Promotion in the Context of Children’s Daily Lives. Research Department of the Office of Communications: London, UK, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Martin MC . Children's understanding of the intent of advertising: a meta-analysis. J Publ Pol Market 1997; 16: 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaufman L, Sandman PM . Countering Children’s Sugared Food Commercials: Do Rebuttals Help?. Annual meeting of the International Communication Association: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Halford JC, Boyland EJ, Hughes GM, Stacey L, McKean S, Dovey TM . Beyond-brand effect of television food advertisements on food choice in children: the effects of weight status. Public Health Nutr 2008; 11: 897–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Seiders K, Petty RD . Taming the obesity beast: children, marketing, and public policy considerations. J Publ Pol Market 2007; 26: 236–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carter OBJ, Patterson LJ, Donovan RJ, Ewing MT, Roberts CM . Children's understanding of the selling versus persuasive intent of junk food advertising: implications for regulation. Soc Sci Med 2011; 72: 962–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Robertson TS, Rossiter JR . Children and commercial persuasion: an attribution theory analysis. J Cons Res 1974; 1: 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rossiter JR, Robertson TS . Children's TV commercials: testing the defenses. J Commun 1974; 137–145.

  11. Mallinckrodt V, Mizerski D . The effects of playing an advergame on young children's perceptions, preferences, and requests. J Advertis 2007; 36: 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Davison KK, Birch LL . Childhood overweight: a contextual model and recommendations for future research. Obes Rev 2001; 2: 159–171.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gibson EL, Wardle J, Watts CJ . Fruit and vegetable consumption, nutritional knowledge and beliefs in mothers and children. Appetite 1998; 31: 205–228.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gracey D, Stanley N, Burke V, Corti B, Beilin LJ . Nutritional knowledge, beliefs and behaviours in teenage school students. Health Educ Res 1996; 11: 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Harris JK, Graff SK . Protecting young people from junk food advertising: implications of psychological research for First Amendment Law. Am J Public Health 2012; 102: 214–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Saarela A-M, Lapveteläinen AT, Mykkänen HM, Kantanen TT, Rissanen RL . Real-life setting in data collection. The role of nutrition knowledge whilst selecting food products for weight management purposes in a supermarket environment. Appetite 2013; 73: 196–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Friestad M, Wright P . The Persuasion Knowledge Model: how people cope with persuasion attempts. J Cons Res 1994; 21: 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Glanz K, Basil M, Maibach E, Goldberg J, Snyder D . Why Americans eat what they do: taste, nutrition, cost, convenience, and weight control concerns as influences on food consumption. J Am Diet Assoc 1998; 98: 1118–1126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cairns G, Angus K, Hastings G, Caraher M . Systematic reviews of the evidence on the nature, extent and effects of food marketing to children. a retrospective summary. Appetite 2013; 62: 209–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Folta SC, Goldberg JP, Economos C, Bell R, Meltzer R . Food advertising targeted at school-age children: a content analysis. J Nutr Educ Behav 2006; 38: 244–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (Updated May 2015). The National Health and Medical Research Council, the Australian Research Council and the Australian Vice-Chancellors' Committee. Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra, Australia, 2007.

  22. Myers JL . Fundamentals of Experimental Design, 2nd edn. Allyn and Bacon Inc.: Boston, MA, USA, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kelly B, Chapman K, King L, Hebden L . Trends in food advertising to children on free-to-air television in Australia. Aust NZ J Public Health 2011; 35: 131–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pechmann C, Stewart DJ . Advertising repetition: a critical review of wearin and wearout. Curr Issues Res Advertis 1988; 11: 285–330.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pettigrew S, Tarabashkina L, Roberts M, Quester P, Chapman K, Miller C . The effects of television and internet food advertising on parents and children. Public Health Nutr 2013; 16: 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rasanen M, Keskinen S, Niinikoski H, Heino T, Simell O, Ronnemaa T et al. Impact of nutrition counselling on nutrition knowledge and nutrient intake of 7-to 9-y-old children in an atherosclerosis prevention project. Eur J Clin Nutr 2004; 58: 162–172.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mooi E, Sarstedt M . A Concise Guide to Market Research: The Process, Data, and Methods Using IBM SPSS Statistics. Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. World Health Organization. Growth Reference Data for 5–19 years, 2007. Available at: http://www.who.int/growthref/en/index.html (last accessed June 2015).

  29. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Children Who are Overweight or Obese. National Health Survey: Summary of results, 2007–2008, 2009. Available at: http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4102.0Main+Features20Sep+2009 (last accessed August 2012).

  30. Heslop LA, Ryans AB . A second look at children and the advertising of premiums. J Cons Res 1980; 6: 414–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Livingstone S, Helsper E . Does advertising literacy mediate the effects of advertising on children? A critical examination of two linked research literatures in relation to obesity and food choice. J Commun 2006; 56: 560–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Banach A, Wade TJ, Cairney J, Hay JA, Faught BE, O'Leary DD . Comparison of anthropometry and parent-reported height and weight among nine year olds. Can J Public Health 2007; 98: 251–253.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gorn GJ, Goldberg ME . Behavioral evidence of the effects of televised food messages on children. J Cons Res 1982; 9: 200–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rozendaal E, Buijzen M, Valkenburg P . Do children's cognitive defenses reduce their desire for advertised products? Communications 2009; 34: 287–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pechmann C, Levine L, Loughlin S, Leslie F . Impulsive and self-conscious: adolescents’ vulnerability to advertising and promotion. J Publ Pol Market 2005; 24: 202–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Drewnowski A . Taste preferences and food intake. Annu Rev Nutr 1997; 17: 237–253.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Cornwell BT, McAlister AR . Alternative thinking about starting points of obesity. Development of child taste preferences. Appetite 2011; 56: 428–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gerrits JH, de Ridder DTD, de Wit JBF, Kuijer RG . Cool and independent or foolish and undisciplined? Adolescents’ prototypes of (un)healthy eaters and their association with eating behaviour. Appetite 2009; 53: 407–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lin J, Peng W An advertising literacy workshop to enhance young adolescents’ understanding of traditional and emerging advertising of food. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association. Suntec Singapore International Convention and Exhibition Centre: Suntec City, Singapore, 2010.

  40. Rasnake KL, Laube E, Lewis M, Linscheid TR . Children's nutritional judgements: relation to eating attitudes and body image. Health Commun 2005; 18: 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Dixon H, Scully M, Kelly B, Chapman K, Wakefield M . Can counter-advertising reduce pre-adolescent children’s susceptibility to front-of-package promotions on unhealthy foods? Experimental research. Soc Sci Med 2014; 116: 211–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bollars C, Boyland E, Breda J, Gapanenko K, Halford J, Klepp KI et al. Marketing of Foods High in Fat, Salt and Sugar to Children: Update 2012–2013. WHO Regional Office for Europe: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rozendaal E, Slot N, van Reijmersdal EA, Buijzen M . Children’s responses to advertising in social games. J Advertis 2013; 42: 142–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the parents and children who took part in this research, as well as research assistants who aided data collection. We are also grateful to the management of the Royal Adelaide Show (South Australia) for their support in data collection. The study was funded by an International Postgraduate Research Scholarship provided by the University of Adelaide, the Australian Research Council Linkage Grant No. LP0991615 (‘Investigating the indirect effects of child targeted food promotion on children's diet’) and the Cancer Council South Australia and New South Wales.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia

    L Tarabashkina, P Quester & R Crouch

Authors
  1. L Tarabashkina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P Quester
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R Crouch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L Tarabashkina.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on International Journal of Obesity website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tarabashkina, L., Quester, P. & Crouch, R. Food advertising, children’s food choices and obesity: interplay of cognitive defences and product evaluation: an experimental study. Int J Obes 40, 581–586 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2015.234

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2015.234

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links