Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Are teachers’ judgements of pupils’ ability influenced by body shape?

Abstract

Background:

Evidence indicates that teachers can judge pupils on the basis of their physical appearance, including their body shape. Teacher bias towards obese pupils has been suggested as a potential pathway through which obese children attain relatively lower academic levels. The aim of this study was to investigate whether teachers’ judgements of pupils’ ability are influenced by the body shape of the child.

Methods:

The sample includes English, singleton children in state schools from the Millennium Cohort Study. The data were taken from the fourth wave of data collection, when the children were approximately 7 years old. In all, 5086/5072 children had teacher ability ratings of reading and maths. Logistic regression analyses were used to test whether teachers’ perceptions of the child’s reading and mathematics ability were influenced by the pupil’s waist circumference, conditional upon cognitive test scores of reading and maths ability.

Results:

After adjustment for cognitive test scores, no significant overall relationship was found between the pupil’s waist circumference and the teacher’s judgements of ability. No statistically significant differences were observed in the probability of being judged as above average after further adjustments were made for potential confounders.

Conclusions:

There is little evidence that teachers’ judgements of pupils’ ability are influenced by obesity.

Your institute does not have access to this article

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. Puhl RM, Heuer CA . The stigma of obesity: a review and update. Obesity 2009; 17: 941–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Richardson SA, Goodman N, Hastorf AH, Dornbusch SM . Cultural uniformity in reaction to physical-disabilities. Am Sociol Rev 1961; 26: 241–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Maddox GL, Back KW, Liederman VR . Overweight as a social deviance and disability. J Health Soc Behav 1968; 9: 287–298.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Goodman N, Dornbusch SM, Richardson SA, Hastorf AH . Variant reactions of physical disabilities. Am Sociol Rev 1963; 28: 429–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schwartz MB, Vartanian LR, Nosek BA, Brownell KD . The influence of one's own body weight on implicit and explicit anti-fat bias. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2006; 14: 440–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zeller MH, Reiter-Purtill J, Ramey C . Negative peer perceptions of obese children in the classroom environment. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008; 16: 755–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Latner JD, Stunkard AJ . Getting worse: the stigmatization of obese children. Obes Res 2003; 11: 452–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Campbell T . Stereotyped at Seven? Biases in teacher judgements of pupils' ability and attainment. University of London: Institute of Education: London, UK, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Burgess S, Greaves E . Test scores, subjective assessment and stereotyping of ethnic minorities The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, 2009, CMPO working paper, no. 09/221.

  10. Macmann C . The impact of obesity on academic achievement: implications for the global obesity epidemic. Invited Talk 2010; Educational Testing Service. [PowerPoint slides]. Available at http://www.academia.edu/1665948/The_impact_of_obesity_on_academic_achievement_Implications_for_the_global_obesity_epidemic.

  11. Caird J, Kavanagh J, Oliver K, Oliver S, O’Mara A, Stansfield C et al Childhood Obesity and Educational Attainment: a Systematic Review. EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London: London, UK, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clifford MM, Walster E . The effect of physical attractivenss on teacher expectations. Sociol Educ 1973; 46: 248–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Demeis DK, Turner RR . Effects of students race, physical attractiveness, and dialect on teachers evaluations. Contemp Educ Psychol 1978; 3: 77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. O'Brien KS, Hunter JA, Banks M . Implicit anti-fat bias in physical educators: physical attributes, ideology and socialization. Int J Obes 2007; 31: 308–314.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Peterson JL, Puhl RM, Luedicke J . An experimental assessment of physical educators' expectations and attitudes: the importance of student weight and gender. J Sch Health 2012; 82: 432–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bacon JG, Scheltema KE, Robinson BE . Fat phobia scale revisited: the short form. Int J Obes 2001; 25: 252–257.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M, Harris T . Beliefs and attitudes about obesity among teachers and school health care providers working with adolescents. J Nutr Educ 1999; 31: 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Quinn BH . Attitudinal Ratings of Educators Toward Normal Weight, Overweight, and Obese Teenage Girls. Dissertation Abstracts International: Texas Women's University: Denton, TX, USA, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schroer NA . Perceptions of In-service Teachers and Pre-service Teachers Toward Obese and Normal-weight Children. Dissertation Abstracts International: Texas A&M University: College Station, TX, USA, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Strand S, Demie F . Pupil mobility, attainment and progress in primary school. Br Educ Res J 2006; 32: 551–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jussim L, Robustelli SL, Cain TR . Teacher expectations and self -fulfilling prophecies. In: Wentzel KR, Wigfield A eds Handbook of Motivation at School. Routledge: New York, NY, USA; London, UK, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hansen K, Johnson J, Joshi H, Calderwood L, Jones E, McDonald J et al Millennium Cohort Study First, Second, Third and Fourth Surveys: a Guide to the Datasets. CLS, Institute of Education: London, UK, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gray JC, Gatenby R, Huang Y . Millennium Cohort Study Sweep 4: Technical Report. NatCen: London, 2010. Report No.: Contract No.: P2544.

    Google Scholar 

  24. abilitypath.org. Finding balance: obesity and children with Special Needs. 2012; Available from http://www.abilitypath.org/health-daily-care/health/growth-and-nutrition/articles/obesity/pdfs/obesity-report.pdf [updated 17 July 2013].

  25. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 12. StataCorp LP: College Station, TX, USA, 2011.

  26. Anderson LB The trend in obesity: the effect of social norms on perceived weight and weight goal. Working Paper 2009. (in press).

  27. Campbell T . In-school ability grouping and the month of birth effect: preliminary evidence from the Millennium Cohort Study. CLS Cohort Studies. Institute of Education, University of London: London, UK, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Durant D . The achievement and progress made from Key Stage 1 to GCSE by the classes of 2003 and 2004. British Educational Research Association Annual Conference; 14-17 September. University of Glamorgan, 2005. Available at www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/143373.doc.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Florence MD, Asbridge M, Veugelers PJ . Diet quality and academic performance. J Sch Health 2008; 78: 209–215 quiz 39-41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bruce AS, Holsen LM, Chambers RJ, Martin LE, Brooks WM, Zarcone JR et al. Obese children show hyperactivation to food pictures in brain networks linked to motivation, reward and cognitive control. Int J Obes 2010; 34: 1494–1500.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Institute of Education for the use of these data and to the UK Data Archive and Economic and Social Data Service for making them available. The research received no specific funding; however, both authors are recipients of ESRC doctoral training studentships.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N L Shackleton.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shackleton, N., Campbell, T. Are teachers’ judgements of pupils’ ability influenced by body shape?. Int J Obes 38, 520–524 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2013.210

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2013.210

Keywords

  • paediatrics
  • stereotyping
  • social stigma
  • school teachers

Further reading

Search

Quick links