Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Instruments for analysing the influence of advertising on children's food choices

International Journal of Obesity volume 35, pages S137–S143 (2011)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Objective:

The aim of this report was to present methodological aspects of assessing the effects of advertising on children's food choices and preferences.

Methods:

Two instruments have been used: first, a choice experiment on children's food knowledge and preferences, and second, a questionnaire on children's knowledge about and attitudes towards advertising. The choice experiment employed 10 matched pairs of food items, each represented in two magazines, one that tested knowledge and the other food preferences. The children's questionnaire contained four dimensions that tested children's credibility and suspiciousness of, as well as entertainment by, advertising. Although based on already developed tools, both instruments were modified to suit the young target group and ensure cross-cultural comparability. The questionnaire was validated via Cronbach's alpha and factor analysis.

Subjects:

A total of 393 children aged 5–11 years from seven European countries participated in the study.

Results:

Both instruments proved to be valid and reliable to analyse the food knowledge and preferences of children, as well as knowledge about and attitudes towards advertising. While 92.2% of the children predominantly recognised the healthier food, only 33.2% also preferred the healthier food. The Cronbach's alpha values for the dimensions were 0.470 for credibility, 0.409 for suspiciousness and 0.295 for entertainment factor. The gathered data revealed that children are rather critical and suspicious of advertising and only moderately entertained.

Conclusion:

Both instruments are applicable for the 5- to 11-year-old age group in different European countries. Descriptive results indicate additional insights into the effects of advertising on children's food knowledge, preferences and food choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Robinson TN, Borzekowski DLG, Matheson DM, Kraemer HC . Effects of fast food branding on young children's taste preferences. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007; 161/8: 792–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ekström KM, Tufte B . Introduction. In: Eckstrøm KM, Tufte B (eds). Children, Media and Consumption—On the Front Edge. Nordicum; Gothenborg, 2007, pp 11–30.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Story M, French S . Food advertising and marketing directed at children and adolescents in the US. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2004; 1/1: 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stead M, McDermott L, Hastings G . Towards evidence-based marketing: the case of childhood obesity. Market Theor 2007; 7/4: 379–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Desrochers DM, Holt DJ . Children's exposure to television advertising: implications for childhood obesity. J Public Policy Mark 2007; 26/2: 182–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hastings GM, Stead L, McDermott A, Forsyth A, MacKintosh M, Rayner C et al. Review of the Research on the Effects of Food Promotion to children. Report for the Food Standard Agency, Centre for Social Marketing: Glasgow, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kelly B, Smith B, King L, Flood V, Bauman A . Television food advertising to children: the extent and nature of exposure. Public Health Nutr 2007; 10/11: 1234–1240.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Taveras EM, Sandora TJ, Shih M-C, Ross-Degnan D, Goldmann DA, Gillman MW . The association of television and video viewing with fast food intake by preschool-age children. Obesity 2006; 14/11: 2034–2041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Halford JCG, Boyland EJ, Cooper GD, Dovey TM, Smith CJ, Williams N et al. 2008). Children's food preferences: effects of weight status, food type, branding and television food advertisements (commercials). Int J Pediatr Obes 2008; 3/1: 31–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahrens W, Bammann K, de Henauw S, Halford J, Palou A, Pigeot I et al. Understanding and preventing childhood obesity and related disorders—IDEFICS: a European multilevel epidemiological approach. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2006; 16/4: 302–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Calfas KJ, Sallis JF, Nader PR . The development of scales to measure knowledge and preference behavior in 4- to 8-year-old children. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1991; 12/3: 185–190.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kopelman CA, Roberts LM, Adab P . Advertising of food to children: is brand logo recognition related to their food knowledge, eating behaviours and food preferences? J Public Health 2007; 29/4: 358–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Diehl JM . Macht Werbung Dick? Einfluss der Lebensmittelwerbung auf Kinder und Jugendliche. Ernährungs-Umschau 2005; 52: 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Baxter SD, Smith AF, Litaker MS, Baglio ML, Guinn CH, Shaffer NM . Children's social desirability and dietary reports. J Nutr Educ Behav 2004; 36/2: 84–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pecheux C, Derbaix C . Children and attitude toward the brand: a new measurement scale. J Advert Res 1999; 39/4: 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mazzocchi M . Statistics for Marketing and Consumer Research. Sage Publications: London, UK, 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim J-O, Mueller CW . Introduction to Factor Analysis—What It Is and How To Do It. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-013, Sage Publications: Newbury Park, CA, 1978.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was done as part of the IDEFICS study (http://www.idefics.eu). We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the European Community within the Sixth RTD Framework Programme Contract No. 016181 (FOOD) and the funding from EU DG Research for the IDEFICS study. We gratefully acknowledge the development of the parent–child instrument by Jessica Dreas from the Bremen Institute for Prevention Research and Social Medicine (BIPS), Germany, in collaboration with Eva Ossiansson and Barbro Johansson from the Gothenburg Research Institute at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden. The ethnographic studies have been developed by Eva Ossiansson and Barbro Johansson from the Gothenburg Research Institute at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden. We are particularly thankful for the feedback received from the field teams in the participating IDEFICS countries, which helped us to develop and improve the instruments. We also thank the German AID Infodienst for permission to use their food cards. Finally, we thank the children, parents and staff of the co-operating school in Denmark (St Petri Dansk-Tysk Skole in Copenhagen) and all children and parents participating in the IDEFICS study.

The information in this document reflects the author's view and is provided as is.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Intercultural Communication and Management,

    W Gwozdz & L A Reisch

  2. Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark

    W Gwozdz & L A Reisch

Authors
  1. W Gwozdz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L A Reisch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

on behalf of the IDEFICS Consortium

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W Gwozdz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Statement of ethics

We certify that all applicable institutional and governmental regulations regarding the ethical use of human volunteers were followed during this research. Approval by the appropriate ethical committees was obtained by each of the eight centres engaged in the fieldwork. Participants were not subjected to any study procedure before both the children and their parents gave their consent for examinations, collection of samples, subsequent analysis and storage of personal data and collected samples. The participating children and their parents could consent to single components of the study while refraining from others.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gwozdz, W., Reisch, L. & on behalf of the IDEFICS Consortium. Instruments for analysing the influence of advertising on children's food choices. Int J Obes 35 (Suppl 1), S137–S143 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2011.46

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2011.46

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links