Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Short Communication
  • Published:

Cost-free and sustainable incentive increases healthy eating decisions during elementary school lunch

Abstract

We aimed to develop a cost-free and sustainable program to influence healthier eating decisions during elementary school lunch. Baseline food and beverage choices were assessed for 9 days during lunch service at two racially and economically diverse elementary schools in Spartanburg County, SC, USA. After being informed that the labeled items on the daily lunch menu represented the healthiest choice, students were allowed to ring a call bell in the cafeteria for public recognition when they chose all of the identified healthiest food and beverage items during lunch service. Using menus matched to the baseline phase, food and beverage choices were measured during a 9-day intervention phase. After 30 days, food and beverage choices were reassessed during a 3-day follow-up phase. Healthiest food & beverage choices increased 49% with >60% of students choosing non-flavored milk over flavored milk during the intervention phase. There was no difference in the success of the program between the two schools. The program continued and healthy eating decisions were significantly sustained at a 30-day follow-up assessment. Public recognition through bell ringing appears to be an effective practice to sustain increases in healthy eating decisions during elementary school lunch and warrants expansion to larger scale, longitudinal trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lobstein T, Baur L, Uauy R, IASO International Obesity TaskForce. Obesity in children and young people: a crisis in public health. Obes Rev 2004; 5 (Suppl 1): 4–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Lamb MM, Flegal KM . Prevalence of high body mass index in US children and adolescents, 2007–2008. JAMA 2010; 303: 242–249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Child and Adolescent Health Measurement Initiative. 2007 National Survey of Children's Health. http://www.childhealthdata.org/ (accessed 13 July 2011).

  4. Datar A, Sturm R, Magnabosco JL . Childhood overweight and academic performance: National study of kindergartners and first-graders. Obes Res 2004; 12: 58–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pyle SA, Sharkey J, Yetter G, Felix E, Furlong MJ, Poston WSC . Fighting an epidemic: the role of schools in reducing childhood obesity. Psychol Sch 2006; 43: 361–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dietz WH . Childhood weight affects adult morbidity and mortality. J Nutr 1998; 128: 411–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Katz DL, O’Connell M, Njike VY, Yeh MC, Nawaz H . Strategies for the prevention and control of obesity in the school setting: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes 2008; 32: 1780–1789.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Durant N, Baskin ML, Thomas O, Allison DB . School-based obesity treatment and prevention programs: all in all, just another brick in the wall? Int J Obes 2008; 32: 1747–1751.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Concanno K . Nutrition Standards in the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs; Proposed Rule. Federal Register 2011; 76: 2493–2570.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Letter to CDC Director Thomas Frieden. http://www.idfa.org/files/CDC%20letter.pdf (accessed 13 July 2011).

  11. Patterson J, Saidel M . The removal of flavored milk in schools results in a reduction in total milk purchases in all grades, K-12. J Am Diet Assoc 2009; 109: A97.2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Office of Research. Nutrition and Analysis, School Nutrition Dietary Assessment Study-III, Vol. I: School Foodservice, School Food Environment, and Meals Offered and Served, by Anne Gordon, et al. Project Officer, Patricia McKinney: Alexandria, VA, 2007.

  13. Deci EL, Koestner R, Ryan RM . Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: reconsidered once again. Rev Educ Res 2001; 71: 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pittman DW . Educational Video for Elementary School Students. Healthy Eating Decisions Program. http://youtu.be/roiVXgfkbo8 (accessed 13 July 2011).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Susan Thomas, Emily Sheenan, Erica Samples, Covington Avent, Dominique Cox, Taylor Fenig, Bianca Harmon and Gwendolyn McDaniel for their assistance in data collection. We thank Peggy Luther and Ron Jones at Chartwells and the teachers, staff, principals and superintendent of the elementary schools for their cooperation and partnership. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Wofford College and the University of South Carolina-Upstate and supported by the Spartanburg Community Indicators Project, Spartanburg Regional Healthcare System Foundation and Wofford College. Supplementary information and instructions on how to implement this program in an elementary school along with a free multimedia tool kit are available at www.HealthyEatingDecisions.com.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D W Pittman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pittman, D., Parker, J., Getz, B. et al. Cost-free and sustainable incentive increases healthy eating decisions during elementary school lunch. Int J Obes 36, 76–79 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2011.205

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2011.205

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links