Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Does greener mean thinner? Associations between neighbourhood greenspace and weight status among adults in England

International Journal of Obesity volume 36, pages 1108–1113 (2012)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate associations between neighbourhood greenspace and weight status, and to explore the contribution of physical activity to these associations.

Design:

Cross-sectional observational study over two time-periods.

Subjects:

Participants were adults (aged 18 years+) in from a nationally representative sample of the English population for the time periods 2000–2003 (n=42 177) and 2004–2007 (n=36 959).

Measurements:

Weight status was defined as body mass index (BMI) category according to WHO classification. Neighbourhood greenspace was measured using the Generalised Land use Database for England that defines greenspace as parks, open spaces and agricultural land, excluding domestic gardens. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to estimate associations between neighbourhood greenspace and BMI and, in eligible sub-samples, to investigate the contribution of total physical activity to these. All models were adjusted for age, sex, social class, economic activity, neighbourhood income deprivation and urban/rural status.

Results:

In 2000–2003 there was a counterintuitive association between greenspace and BMI. Residence in the greenest areas was significantly associated with increases in overweight (12%) and obesity (23%). In 2004–2007, there was a small protective effect of greenspace for those living in the greenest areas, but this was not statistically significant. Markers of total physical activity did not attenuate associations. Tests for interactions with urban/rural status confirmed that significant associations between neighbourhood greenspace and obesity were only present in urban areas in 2000–2003.

Conclusion:

Better evidence for the utility of greenspace in the prevention of weight gain is required before greenspace interventions are developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Egger G, Swinburn B . An ecological approach to the obesity pandemic. Br med J 1997; 315: 477–480.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Macintyre S, Macdonald L, Ellaway A . Do poorer people have poorer access to local resources and facilities? The distribution of local resources by area deprivation in Glasgow, Scotland. Soc Sci Med 2008; 67: 900–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Giles-Corti B, Broomhall MH, Knuiman M, Collins C, Douglas K, Ng K et al. Increasing walking—How important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space? Am J Prev Med 2005; 28: 169–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Maas J, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP, de Vries S, Spreeuwenberg P . Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation? J Epidemiol Community Health 2006; 60: 587–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Maas J, Verheij RA, Spreeuwenberg P, Groenewegen PP . Physical activity as a possible mechanism behind the relationship between green space and health: a multilevel analysis. BMC Public Health 2008; 8: 206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaczynski AT, Henderson KA . Environmental correlates of physical activity: a review of evidence about parks and recreation. Leisure Sci 2007; 29: 315–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaczynski AT, Potwarka LR, Saelens BE . Association of park size, distance, and features with physical activity in neighborhood parks. Am J Public Health 2008; 98: 1451–1456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Duncan M, Mummery K . Psychosocial and environmental factors associated with physical activity among city dwellers in regional Queensland. Prev Med 2005; 40: 363–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hillsdon M, Panter J, Foster C, Jones A . The relationship between access and quality of urban green space with population physical activity. Public Health 2006; 120: 1127–1132.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ellaway A, Macintyre S, Bonnefoy X . Graffiti, greenery, and obesity in adults: secondary analysis of European cross sectional survey. Br Med J 2005; 331: 611–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nielsen TS, Hansen KB . Do green areas affect health? Results from a Danish survey on the use of green areas and health indicators. Health Place 2007; 13: 839–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Coombes E, Jones AP, Hillsdon M . The relationship of physical activity and overweight to objectively measured green space accessibility and use. Soc Sci Med 2010; 70: 816–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. World Health Organization. Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation. Geneva, 2000.

  14. Sproston D, Mindell J . Health Survey for England 2004. The Health of Minority Ethnic Groups. The Information Centre: London, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. Generalised Landuse Database for England 2001. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: London, 2005.

  16. Department for Communities and Local Government. Generalised Landuse Database Statistics for England 2005. London, 2007.

  17. Noble M, Wright G, Dibben C, Smith GAN, McLennan D, Anttila C et al. Indices of Deprivation 2004. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, Neighbourhood Renewal Unit: London, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Noble M, McLennan D, Wilkinson K, Whitworth A, Barnes H, Dibben C . The English Indices of Deprivation 2007. Department for Communities and Local Government: London, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Countryside Agency. Rural and Urban Area Classification 2004. An Introductory Guide. Countryside Agency: Cheltenham, 2004.

  20. Lachowycz K, Jones A . Greenspace and obesity: a systematic review of the evidence. Obes Rev 2011; 12: 183–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu GC, Wilson JS, Qi R, Ying J . Green neighborhoods, food retail and childhood overweight: differences by population density. Am J Health Promot 2007; 21: 317–325.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bell JF, Wilson JS, Liu GC . Neighborhood greenness and 2-year changes in body mass index of children and youth. Am J Prev Med 2008; 35: 547–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Levine JA . Non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT). Best Pract Res Cl En 2002; 16: 679–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Levine JA, Weg MWV, Hill JO, Klesges RC . Non-exercise activity thermogenesis—the crouching tiger hidden dragon of societal weight gain. Arterioscl Throm Vas 2006; 26: 729–736.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Owen N, Ekelund U, Hamilton M, Gardiner P, Dunstan DW . Sedentary behavior in adults: longitudinal, experimental, and intervention evidence. J Phys Act Health 2010; 7: S334–S336.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Owen N, Mitas J, Sarmiento OL, Reis R, Sugiyama T . Identifying the built environment determinants of physical activity and sedentary behavior: emerging international evidence. J Phys Act Health 2010; 7: S364–S366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Faculty of Public Health Medicine. Great outdoors: how our natural health service uses greenspace to improve wellbeing: an action report. London, 2010.

  28. Marmot M. . Fair society, healthy lives. Strategic review of health inequalities in England Post 2010. The Marmot Review: London, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the award of a Philip Leverhulme Prize to Professor Steven Cummins. He is also supported by a UK National Institute of Health Research Senior Fellowship. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the UK National Health Service, the UK National Institute of Health Research or the UK Department of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Healthy Environments Research Programme, School of Geography, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

    S Cummins

  2. MRC Centre of Epidemiology for Child Health, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK

    J Fagg

Authors
  1. S Cummins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J Fagg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S Cummins.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cummins, S., Fagg, J. Does greener mean thinner? Associations between neighbourhood greenspace and weight status among adults in England. Int J Obes 36, 1108–1113 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2011.195

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2011.195

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links