Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Resilience to obesity among socioeconomically disadvantaged women: the READI study

Abstract

Objective:

This cross-sectional study aimed to identify sociodemographic and behavioural characteristics of ‘overweight-resilient’ women, that is, women who were in a healthy body weight range, despite living in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods that place them at increased risk of obesity. The study also aimed to test a comprehensive theoretically derived model of the associations between intrapersonal, social and environmental factors and obesity among this target group.

Participants:

A total of 3235 women aged 18–45 years from 80 urban and rural neighbourhoods throughout Victoria, Australia, participated in the Resilience for Eating and Activity Despite Inequality study.

Measurements:

Women reported height, weight, sociodemographic characteristics, leisure-time physical activity, dietary behaviours and a range of theoretically derived cognitive, social and neighbourhood environmental characteristics hypothesized to influence obesity risk. A theoretical model predicting body mass index (BMI) was tested using structural equation models.

Results:

Women classified as ‘resilient’ to obesity tended to be younger, born overseas, more highly educated, unmarried and to have higher or undisclosed household incomes. They engaged in more leisure-time physical activity and consumed less fast foods and soft drinks than overweight/obese women. Neighbourhood characteristics, social characteristics and cognitive characteristics all contributed to explaining variation in BMI in the hypothesized directions.

Conclusions:

These results demonstrate several characteristics of women appearing ‘resilient’ to obesity, despite their increased risk conferred by residing in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods. Acknowledging the cross-sectional study design, the results advance theoretical frameworks aimed at investigating obesity risk by providing evidence in support of a comprehensive model of direct and indirect effects on obesity of neighbourhood, as well as social, cognitive and behavioural characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ball K, Crawford D . Socioeconomic status and weight change in adults: a review. Soc Sci Med 2005; 60: 1987–2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McLaren L . Socioeconomic status and obesity. Epidemiol Rev 2007; 29: 29–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Monasta L, Batty GD, Cattaneo A, Lutje V, Ronfani L, van Lenthe FJ et al. Early-life determinants of overweight and obesity: a review of systematic reviews. Obes Rev 2010; 11: 695–708.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Papas MA, Alberg AJ, Ewing R, Helzlsouer KJ, Gary TL, Klassen AC . The built environment and obesity. Epidemiol Rev 2007; 29: 129–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ball K, Crawford D . Socio-economic factors in obesity: a case of slim chance in a fat world? Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2006; 15 (Suppl): 15–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ball K, Dollman L . Physical activity, healthy eating and obesity prevention: understanding and promoting ‘resilience’ amongst socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. Austral Epidemiol 2010; 17: 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Luthar SS, Cicchetti D, Becker B . The construct of resilience: a critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Dev 2000; 71: 543–562.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rennie KL, Johnson L, Jebb SA . Behavioural determinants of obesity. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005; 19: 343–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hill JO, Wyatt HR, Reed GW, Peters JC . Obesity and the environment: where do we go from here? Science 2003; 299: 853–855.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Baranowski T, Cullen KW, Nicklas TA, Thompson D, Baranowski J . Are current health behavioral change models helpful in guiding prevention of weight gain efforts? Obes Res 2003; 11 (supplement): 23S–43S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jeffery RW . How can Health Behavior Theory be made more useful for intervention research? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2004; 1: 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. MacFarlane A, Abbott G, Crawford D, Ball K . Personal, social and environmental correlates of healthy weight status amongst mothers from socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods: findings from the READI study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2010; 7: 23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. MacFarlane AM, Abbott GR, Crawford DA, Ball K . Sociodemographic and behavioural correlates of weight status among women with children living in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods. Int J Obes 2009; 33: 1289–1298.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wamala SP, Wolk A, Orth-Gomer K . Determinants of obesity in relation to socioeconomic status among middle-aged Swedish women. Prev Med 1997; 26: 734–744.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Roman CG, Knight CR, Chalfin A, Popkin SJ . The relation of the perceived environment to fear, physical activity, and health in public housing developments: Evidence from Chicago. J Public Health Pol 2009; 30: S286–S308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lovasi GS, Hutson MA, Guerra M, Neckerman KM . Built environments and obesity in disadvantaged populations. Epidemiol Rev 2009; 31: 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rutt CD, Coleman KJ . Examining the relationships among built environment, physical activity, and body mass index in El Paso, TX. Prev Med 2005; 40: 831–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Black JL, Macinko J . Neighborhoods and obesity. Nutr Rev 2009; 66: 2–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kamphuis CB, van Lenthe FJ, Giskes K, Brug J, Mackenbach JP . Perceived environmental determinants of physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption among high and low socioeconomic groups in the Netherlands. Health Place 2007; 13: 493–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ball K, Jeffery RW, Abbott G, McNaughton SA, Crawford D . Is healthy behavior contagious? Associations of social norms with physical activity and healthy eating. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2010; 7: 86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2001 Census of Population and Housing - SEIFA 2001. (http://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/D3110124.NSF/f5c7b8fb229cf017ca256973001fecec/a17dc48d988ecf63ca256dad00005ea3!OpenDocument). Accessed on 31 March 2011.

  22. World Health Organization. Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. WHO: Geneva, 2000.

  23. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sport Exer 2003; 35: 1381–1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Marks G, Rutishauser IHE, Webb K, Picton P . Key Food and Nutrition Data for Australia 1990–1999. Commonwealth Dept of Health and Aged Care: Canberra, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Riley M, Rutishauser IHE, Webb K . Comparison of Short Questions with Weighed Dietary Records. Australian Food and Nutrition Monitoring Unit: Canberra, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  26. McLennan W, Podger A . National Nutrition Survey Users’ Guide Australian Bureau of Statistics Catalogue No. 4801.0 (http://144.53.252.30/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/4801.01995?OpenDocument). Accessed on 5 October 2009.

  27. Rutishauser IHE, Webb K, Abraham B, Allsopp R . Evaluation of Short Dietary Questions from the 1995 National Nutrition Survey. National Food and Nutrition Monitoring and Surveillance Project. Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care: Canberra, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sanigorski AM, Bell AC, Swinburn BA . Association of key foods and beverages with obesity in Australian schoolchildren. Public Health Nutr 2007; 10: 152–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hodge A, Patterson AJ, Brown WJ, Ireland P, Giles G . The Anti Cancer Council of Victoria FFQ: relative validity of nutrient intakes compared with weighed food records in young to middle-aged women in a study of iron supplementation. Aust N Z J Public Health 2000; 24: 576–583.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kelloway EK . Using LISREL for Structural Equation Modeling: A Researcher's Guide. Sage: Thousand Oaks: CA, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rovniak LS, Anderson ES, Winett RA, Stephens RS . Social cognitive determinants of physical activity in young adults: a prospective structural equation analysis. Ann Behav Med 2002; 24: 149–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Schumacker RE, Lomax RG . The Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: New Jersey, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Steiger JH . Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Pers Indiv Differ 2007; 42: 893–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ball K, Brown W, Crawford D . Who does not gain weight? Prevalence and predictors of weight maintenance in young women. Int J Obes 2002; 26: 1570–1578.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Malik VS, Schulze MB, Hu FB . Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 2006; 84: 274–288.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Pouliou T, Elliott SJ . Individual and socio-environmental determinants of overweight and obesity in Urban Canada. Health Place 2010; 16: 389–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jebb SA . Dietary determinants of obesity. Obes Rev 2007; 8: 93–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Daniels MC, Popkin BM . Impact of water intake on energy intake and weight status: a systematic review. Nutr Rev 2010; 68: 505–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kremers SP, Visscher TL, Seidell JC, van Mechelen W, Brug J . Cognitive determinants of energy balance-related behaviours: measurement issues. Sports Med 2005; 35: 923–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Burton NW, Brown W, Dobson A . Accuracy of body mass index estimated from self-reported height and weight in mid-aged Australian women. Aust N Z J Public Health 2010; 34: 620–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lechner L, Bolman C, van Dijke M . Factors related to misperception of physical activity in The Netherlands and implications for health promotion programmes. Health Promot Int 2006; 21: 104–112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Kendzierski D, DeCarlo KJ . Physical activity enjoyment scale: two validation studies. J Sport Excerc Psychol 1991; 13: 50–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Baranowski T, Watson K, Missaghian M, Broadfoot A, Baranowski J, Cullen K et al. Parent outcome expectancies for purchasing fruit and vegetables: a validation. Public Health Nutr 2007; 10: 280–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Parmenter K, Wardle J . Development of a general nutrition knowledge questionnaire for adults. Eur J Clin Nutr 1999; 53: 298–308.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Marcus BH, Rakowski W, Rossi JS . Assessing motivational readiness and decision-making for exercise. Health Psychol 1992; 11: 257–261.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Sallis JF, Pinski RB, Grossman RM, Patterson TL, Nader PR . The development of self-efficacy scales for health-related diet and exercise behaviors. Health Educ Res 1988; 3: 283–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Giles-Corti B, Donovan RJ . Relative influences of individual, social environmental, and physical environmental correlates of walking. Am J Public Health 2003; 93: 1583–1589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mujahid MS, Diez Roux AV, Morenoff JD, Raghunathan T . Assessing the measurement properties of neighborhood scales: from psychometrics to ecometrics. Am J Epidemiol 2007; 165: 858–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The READI study was funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, ID 374241. We are grateful to Michelle Jackson for managing the READI fieldwork. KB is supported by a NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship, ID 479513. VC is supported by a NHMRC Postdoctoral Research Fellowship, ID 533917. AT is supported by a VicHealth Public Health Research, ID 2004-0536. LT is supported by a NHMRC Capacity Building Grant, ID 425845. GM is supported by NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Women's Health in the 21st Century (CREWH21). RWJ was supported by the University of Minnesota Obesity Prevention Center, the Minnesota Obesity Center and the Transdisciplinary Center for the Study of Energetics and Cancer, all at the University of Minnesota. AK was supported in part by US Public Health Service Grants R21CA127511, R01HL089694 and U01AG022376. DC is supported by a VicHealth Senior Research Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K Ball.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ball, K., Abbott, G., Cleland, V. et al. Resilience to obesity among socioeconomically disadvantaged women: the READI study. Int J Obes 36, 855–865 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2011.183

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2011.183

Keywords

Search

Quick links