Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Recent fat intake modulates fat taste sensitivity in lean and overweight subjects

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate the effects of a high-fat and low-fat diet on taste sensitivity to oleic acid (C18:1) in lean and overweight/obese (OW/OB) subjects.

Design:

Randomized cross-over dietary intervention involving the consumption of a high-fat (>45% fat) and low-fat (<20% fat) diet, both consumed over a 4-week period.

Subjects:

A total of 19 lean, mean age 33±13 years, mean body mass index (BMI) 23.2±2.2 kg m–2 and 12 OW/OB, mean age 39.5±3 years, mean BMI 28±2.6 kg m–2, subjects participated in the study, which measured taste thresholds for C18:1, fat perception and hedonic ratings for regular (RF) and lowered-fat (LF) foods before, and following consumption of a high- and low-fat diet.

Results:

Consumption of the low-fat diet increased taste sensitivity to C18:1 among lean and OW/OB subjects (P<0.05) and increased the subjects ability to perceive small differences in the fat content of custard (P=0.05). Consumption of the high-fat diet significantly decreased taste sensitivity to C18:1 among lean subjects (P<0.05), with no change in sensitivity among OW/OB persons (P=0.609). The hedonic ratings for several RF and LF foods differed following the diets.

Conclusion:

Alterations in the fat content of the diet modulated taste sensitivity to C18:1 among lean subjects, which was increased following a 4-week period of fat restriction and attenuated following the high-fat diet. The failure of the high-fat diet to alter fatty acid taste thresholds among OW/OB subjects suggests that these individuals were ‘adapted’ to high-fat exposure, perhaps because of differences in habitual fat consumption. Taken together, these data suggest that excessive dietary fat attenuates nutrient sensing epithelia response in the oral cavity, which could be associated with changes in diet and weight status.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Feltrin KL, Little TJ, Meyer JH, Horowitz M, Smout AJ, Wishart J et al. Effects of intraduodenal fatty acids on appetite, antropyloroduodenal motility, and plasma CCK and GLP-1 in humans vary with their chain length. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2004; 287: R524–R533.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sternini C . Taste receptors in the gastrointestinal tract. IV. Functional implications of bitter taste receptors in gastrointestinal chemosensing. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2007; 292: G457–G461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sternini C, Anselmi L, Rozengurt E . Enteroendocrine cells: a site of ′taste′ in gastrointestinal chemosensing. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2008; 15: 73–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stewart JE, Feinle-Bisset C, Golding M, Delahunty C, Clifton PM, Keast RS . Oral sensitivity to fatty acids, food consumption and BMI in human subjects. Br J Nutr 2010; 104: 145–152.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stewart JE SR, Otto B, Keast RSJ, Clifton PC, Feinle-Bisset C . Marked differences in gustatory and gastrointestinal sensitivity to oleic acid in lean and obese men. Am J Clin Nutr; doi: 2011; 93: 703–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boyd KA, O′Donovan DG, Doran S, Wishart J, Chapman IM, Horowitz M et al. High-fat diet effects on gut motility, hormone, and appetite responses to duodenal lipid in healthy men. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2003; 284: G188–G196.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cunningham KM, Daly J, Horowitz M, Read NW . Gastrointestinal adaptation to diets of differing fat composition in human volunteers. Gut 1991; 32: 483–486.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cartoni C, Yasumatsu K, Ohkuri T, Shigemura N, Yoshida R, Godinot N et al. Taste preference for fatty acids is mediated by GPR40 and GPR120. J Neurosci 2010; 30: 8376–8382.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Laugerette F, Passilly-Degrace P, Patris B, Niot I, Febbraio M, Montmayeur JP et al. CD36 involvement in orosensory detection of dietary lipids, spontaneous fat preference, and digestive secretions. J Clin Invest 2005; 115: 3177–3184.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Covasa M, Ritter RC . Reduced sensitivity to the satiation effect of intestinal oleate in rats adapted to high-fat diet. Am J Physiol 1999; 277 (1 Part 2): R279–R285.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Covasa M, Ritter RC . Adaptation to high-fat diet reduces inhibition of gastric emptying by CCK and intestinal oleate. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2000; 278: R166–R170.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao FL, Herness S . Resynthesis of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate mediates adaptation of the caffeine response in rat taste receptor cells. J Physiol 2009; 587 (Part 2): 363–377.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao FL, Lu SG, Herness S . Dual actions of caffeine on voltage-dependent currents and intracellular calcium in taste receptor cells. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2002; 283: R115–R129.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stunkard AJ, Messick S . The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. J Psychosom Res 1985; 29: 71–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schofield WN . Predicting basal metabolic rate, new standards and review of previous work. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr 1985; 39: 5–41.

    Google Scholar 

  16. ASTM . Standard practice for determination of odor and taste thresholds by a forced-choice ascending concentration series method of limits. Am So Testing Materials 2004, pp 1–7.

  17. Chale-Rush A, Burgess JR, Mattes RD . Multiple routes of chemosensitivity to free fatty acids in humans. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2007; 292: G1206–G1212.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Harris CV, Bradlyn AS, Coffman J, Gunel E, Cottrell L . BMI-based body size guides for women and men: development and validation of a novel pictorial method to assess weight-related concepts. Int J Obes (Lond) 2008; 32: 336–342.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Corpeleijn E, van der Kallen CJH, Kruijshoop M, Magagnin MGP, de Bruin TWA, Feskens EJM et al. Direct association of a promoter polymorphism in the CD36/FAT fatty acid transporter gene with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and insulin resistance. Diabetic Med 2006; 23: 907–911.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Love-Gregory L, Sherva R, Sun LW, Wasson J, Schappe T, Doria A et al. Variants in the CD36 gene associate with the metabolic syndrome and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Hum Mol Genet 2008; 17: 1695–1704.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vettor R, Granzotto M, De Stefani D, Trevellin E, Rossato M, Farina MG et al. Loss-of-function mutation of the GPR40 gene associates with abnormal stimulated insulin secretion by acting on intracellular calcium mobilization. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 93: 3541–3550.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pepino MY, Finkbeiner S, Beauchamp GK, Mennella JA . Obese women have lower monosodium glutamate taste sensitivity and prefer higher concentrations than do normal-weight women. Obesity 2010; 18: 959–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. He K, Zhao L, Daviglus ML, Dyer AR, Van Horn L, Garside D et al. Association of monosodium glutamate intake with overweight in Chinese adults: the INTERMAP Study. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008; 16: 1875–1880.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Seimon RV, Lange K, Little TJ, Brennan IM, Pilichiewicz AN, Feltrin KL et al. Pooled-data analysis identifies pyloric pressures and plasma cholecystokinin concentrations as major determinants of acute energy intake in healthy, lean men. Am J Clin Nutr 2010; 92: 61–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang XJ, Zhou LH, Ban X, Liu DX, Jiang W, Liu XM . Decreased expression of CD36 in circumvallate taste buds of high-fat diet induced obese rats. Acta Histochem 2011; 113: 663–667.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Druz LLBR . Taste thresholds and hedonic responses of panels representing three nationalities. J Food Sci 1982; 47: 561–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mattes RD . Fat preference and adherence to a reduced-fat diet. Am J Clin Nutr 1993; 57: 373–381.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chale-Rush A, Burgess JR, Mattes RD . Evidence for human orosensory (taste?) sensitivity to free fatty acids. Chem Senses 2007; 32: 423–431.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Ms Anna Stewart for her kind assistance with food preparation and cooking during the dietary trials and Ms Lisa Newman for her assistance with data collection. The study was registered as a clinical trial on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (registration number 12610000673044). Jessica Stewart was supported by a Deakin University Research Scholarship, a Food Futures Flagship Scholarship provided by the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation and the Strategic Research Centre, Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, Deakin University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R S J Keast.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stewart, J., Keast, R. Recent fat intake modulates fat taste sensitivity in lean and overweight subjects. Int J Obes 36, 834–842 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2011.155

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2011.155

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links