Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Pediatric Highlight
  • Published:

Children's acceptance of a peer who is overweight: relations among gender, age and blame for weight status

Abstract

Objective:

To examine the role of blame as a mediator of the relationships between perceiver age and gender and children's acceptance of an overweight peer.

Design:

Cross-sectional study of children's perceptions of their overweight peers using structural equation modeling.

Participants:

Two hundred and ninety-one children between the ages of 3 and 11 years.

Measurements:

Children viewed a videotape of a same-sex peer, dressed to appear overweight, interacting with an adult. After viewing the videotape, children responded to items assessing their perceptions of the child's social and emotional traits and how much the child was to blame for being overweight.

Results:

Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the traits loaded on a single factor, acceptance. Results of analyses for our structural equation model indicated that as blame increased, acceptance of the peer decreased. The relationships between gender and blame and gender and acceptance were not significant. Children were categorized into three age groups (3–4, 5–8 and 9–11 years) to examine the influence of age. Children between 5 and 8 years of age were less likely to blame the model compared with younger and older children.

Conclusion:

Preschoolers reported the lowest acceptance, indicating a need for intervention for children in this age range. Furthermore, it will be important to conduct longitudinal studies to determine the influence of interventions as the child passes through different developmental stages.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

References

  1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM . Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. JAMA 2006; 295: 1549–1555.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yngve A, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Wolf A, Grjibovski A, Brug J, Due P et al. Differences in prevalence of overweight and stunting in 11-year olds across Europe: The pro children study. Eur J Public Health 2007; 18: 126–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kelehar R (Executive Producer). Honey, we're killing the kids. [Television Series]. TLC 2006.

  4. Johnston CA, Steele RG . Treatment of pediatric overweight: an examination of feasibility and effectiveness in an applied clinical setting. J Pediatr Psychol 2007; 32: 106–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mackey ER, La Greca AM . Adolescents' eating, exercise, and weight control behaviors: does peer crowd affiliation play a role? J Pediatr Psychol 2007; 32: 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barlow SE, and the expert committee. Expert committee recommendations regarding the preparation, assessment, and treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity: summary report. Pediatrics 2007; 120: S164–S192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lobstein T, Jackson-Leach R . Child overweight and obesity in the USA: prevalence rates according to IOTF definitions. Int Journal Pediatr Obes 2007; 2: 62–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Puhl RM, Latner JD . Stigma, obesity, and the health of the nation's children. Psychol Bull 2007; 133: 557–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zeller MH, Modi AC . Predictors of health-related quality of life in obese youth. Obes Res 2006; 14: 122–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Neumark-Sztainer D, Falkner N, Story M, Perry C, Hannan PJ, Mulert S . Weight-teasing among adolescents: correlations with weight status and disordered eating behaviors. Int J Obes 2002; 26: 123–131.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jackson TD, Grilo CM, Masheb RM . Teasing history and eating disorder features: an age- and body mass index-matched comparison of bulimia nervosa and binge-eating disorder. Compre Psychol 2000; 43: 108–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bell SK, Morgan SB . Children's attitudes and behavioral intentions toward a peer presented as obese: does medical explanation for the obesity make a difference? J Pediatr Psychol 2000; 25: 137–145.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Juvonen J . Deviance, perceived responsibility, and negative peer reactions. Devl Psychol 1991; 27: 672–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Juvonen J . Negative peer reactions from the perspective of the reactor. J Educ Psychol 1992; 84: 314–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Weiner B . An Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion. Springer-Verlag: New York 1986.

  16. Molden DC, Dweck CS . Finding ‘meaning’ in psychology: a lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development. Am Psychol 2006; 61: 192–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Musher-Eizenman DR, Holub SC, Miller AB, Goldstein SE, Edwards-Leeper L . Body size stigmatization in preschool children: the role of control attributions. J Pediatr Psychol 2004; 29: 613–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sigelman CK, Begley NL . The early development of reactions to peers with controllable and uncontrollable problems. J Pediatr Psychol 1987; 12: 99–114.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Richardson SA . Age and sex differences in values toward the physically handicapped. J Health Soc Behav 1970; 11: 307–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Brylinsky JA, Moore JC . The identification of body build stereotypes in young children. J Res Person 1994; 28: 170–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cramer P, Steinwert T . Thin is good, fat is bad: how early does it begin? J Appl Dev Psychol 1998; 19: 429–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sigelman CK, Miller TE, Whitworth LA . The early development of stigmatizing reactions to physical differences. J Appl Dev Psychol 1986; 7: 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Graham JA, Cohen R . Race and sex as factors in children's sociometric ratings and friendship choices. Soc Dev 1997; 6: 355–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. DeLoache JS, Peralta de Mendoza OA, Anderson KN . Multiple factors in early symbol use: instructions, similarity, and age in understanding a symbol-referent relation. Cogn Dev 1999; 14: 299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lehmkuhl HD . Relationship among weight status, age, gender, and children's peer acceptance. Personal communication.

  26. Thompson SH, Rafiroiu AC, Sargent RG . Examining gender, racial, and age differences in weight concern among third, fifth, eighth, and eleventh graders. Eat Behav 2003; 3: 307–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cohen R, Budesheim TL, MacDonald CD, Eymard LA . Weighing the evidence: likability and trait attributions of a peer as a function of behavioral characteristics, body weight, and sex. Child Stud J 1997; 27: 69–94.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cohen R, Klesges RC, Summerville M, Meyers AW . A developmental analysis of the influence of body weight on the sociometry of child. Addict Behav 1989; 14: 473–476.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lehmkuhl HD, Nabors LA, Deck T . Factors influencing children's perceptions of overweight peers Poster presented at the Kansas Conference in Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology Lawrence, KS 2002.

  30. Nabors LA, Larson ER . The effects of brief interventions on children's playmate preferences for a child sitting in a wheelchair. J Dev Phys Dis 2002; 14: 403–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nabors LA, Morgan SB . Preschool children's verbal responses and attitudes toward an adult with an orthopedic handicap. J Dev Phys Dis 1993; 5: 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sigelman CK . The effect of causal information on peer perceptions of children with physical problems. J Appl Dev Psychol 1991; 12: 237–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jöreskog KG, Dörbom D . LISREL 8.3. [Computer software]. Scientific Software:Mooresville, IN, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ritchey PN, Frank RA, Hursti U, Tuorila H . Validation and cross national comparisons of the food neophobia scale (FNS) using confirmatory factor analysis. Appetite 2002; 38: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Adams K, Sargent RG, Thompson SH, Richter D, Corwin SJ, Rogan TJ . A study of body weight concerns and weight control practices of 4th and 7th grade adolescents. Ethn Health 2000; 5: 79–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Heider F . The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. Wiley: New York, 1958.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the research assistants who assisted with data collection for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to E A Iobst or L A Nabors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iobst, E., Ritchey, P., Nabors, L. et al. Children's acceptance of a peer who is overweight: relations among gender, age and blame for weight status. Int J Obes 33, 736–742 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2009.52

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2009.52

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links