Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Association between single-slice measurements of visceral and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue with volumetric measurements: the Framingham Heart Study

Abstract

Objective:

Volumetric visceral abdominal adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue (SAT) as measured by computed tomography (CT) are associated with metabolic risk factors. We sought to identify the correlations of VAT and SAT between area-based measures at different anatomic locations with volumetric measurements to identify the optimal anatomic site, and to relate measurements at this site with metabolic risk factors.

Methods:

We measured SAT and VAT volumes across the total imaging volume, whereas we measured SAT and VAT area at seven predefined anatomic landmarks in 200 participants from the Framingham Heart Study (mean age 54 years, 50% women) who underwent abdominal multi-detector CT. Correlation coefficients were used to assess the association between area measurements and volumes as well as metabolic risk factors stratified by gender.

Results:

Area-based measurements of SAT and VAT obtained at all anatomic landmarks were strongly associated with SAT and VAT volumes (all r>0.93, P<0.0001 and r>0.87, P<0.0001, for women and men; respectively). Consistently, area-based measurements of SAT and VAT obtained at L3/4 were most strongly associated with volumetric measured VAT and SAT independent of age (both r=0.99 in men, r=0.96 for SAT and r=0.99 for VAT in women, all P-value <0.0001) and were similarly correlated with risk factors compared with SAT and VAT volumes (all P<0.05 for fasting plasma glucose, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, systolic blood pressure).

Conclusion:

Among area-based measurements of SAT and VAT, those obtained at the level of L3/4 were strongly associated with SAT and VAT volumes and cardio-metabolic risk factors in both men and women.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hedley AA, Ogden CL, Johnson CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Flegal KM . Prevalence of overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents, and adults, 1999–2002. JAMA 2004; 291: 2847–2850.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, Go A, Greenlund K, Haase N et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2008; 117: e25–e146.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fox CS, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, Pou KM, Maurovich-Horvat P, Liu CY et al. Abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue compartments: association with metabolic risk factors in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2007; 116: 39–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rosito GA, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, Ruberg FL, Mahabadi AA, Vasan RS et al. Pericardial fat, visceral abdominal fat, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and vascular calcification in a community-based sample: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2008; 117: 605–613.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuk JL, Church TS, Blair SN, Ross R . Does measurement site for visceral and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue alter associations with the metabolic syndrome? Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 679–684.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Demerath EW, Sun SS, Rogers N, Lee M, Reed D, Choh AC et al. Anatomical patterning of visceral adipose tissue: race, sex, and age variation. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2007; 15: 2984–2993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Abate N, Garg A, Coleman R, Grundy SM, Peshock RM . Prediction of total subcutaneous abdominal, intraperitoneal, and retroperitoneal adipose tissue masses in men by a single axial magnetic resonance imaging slice. Am J Clin Nutr 1997; 65: 403–408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Han TS, McNeill G, Seidell JC, Lean ME . Predicting intra-abdominal fatness from anthropometric measures: the influence of stature. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1997; 21: 587–593.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shen W, Punyanitya M, Wang Z, Gallagher D, St-Onge MP, Albu J et al. Visceral adipose tissue: relations between single-slice areas and total volume. Am J Clin Nutr 2004; 80: 271–278.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kannel W . The Framingham Study: An epidemiological Investigation of Cardiovascular disease. DHEW publication 1973; NIH 74-599, section 30.

  11. Dawber TR, Kannel WB, Lyell LP . An approach to longitudinal studies in a community: the Framingham Study. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1963; 107: 539–556.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maurovich-Horvat P, Massaro J, Fox CS, Moselewski F, O’Donnell CJ, Hoffmann U . Comparison of anthropometric, area- and volume-based assessment of abdominal subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue volumes using multi-detector computed tomography. Int J Obes (Lond) 2007; 31: 500–506.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yoshizumi MO, Kashani A, Palmer J, Lee G, Mondino B . High dose intramuscular methylprednisolone in experimental Staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 1999; 15: 91–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Borkan GA, Gerzof SG, Robbins AH, Hults DE, Silbert CK, Silbert JE . Assessment of abdominal fat content by computed tomography. Am J Clin Nutr 1982; 36: 172–177.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Seidell JC, Bakker CJ, van der Kooy K . Imaging techniques for measuring adipose-tissue distribution—a comparison between computed tomography and 1.5-T magnetic resonance. Am J Clin Nutr 1990; 51: 953–957.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yoon DY, Moon JH, Kim HK, Choi CS, Chang SK, Yun EJ et al. Comparison of low-dose CT and MR for measurement of intra-abdominal adipose tissue: a phantom and human study. Acad Radiol 2008; 15: 62–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Demerath EW, Shen W, Lee M, Choh AC, Czerwinski SA, Siervogel RM et al. Approximation of total visceral adipose tissue with a single magnetic resonance image. Am J Clin Nutr 2007; 85: 362–368.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Demerath EW, Reed D, Rogers N, Sun SS, Lee M, Choh AC et al. Visceral adiposity and its anatomical distribution as predictors of the metabolic syndrome and cardio-metabolic risk factor levels. Am J Clin Nutr 2008; 88: 1263–1271.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute's Framingham Heart Study (N01-HC-25195).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C S Fox.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Irlbeck, T., Massaro, J., Bamberg, F. et al. Association between single-slice measurements of visceral and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue with volumetric measurements: the Framingham Heart Study. Int J Obes 34, 781–787 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2009.279

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2009.279

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links