Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Dietary glycaemic index, glycaemic load and subsequent changes of weight and waist circumference in European men and women

Abstract

Objectives:

To investigate whether dietary glycaemic index (GI) and glycaemic load (GL) were associated with subsequent weight and waist circumference change.

Design:

Population-based prospective cohort study.

Setting:

Five European countries, which are Denmark, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands and the United Kingdom.

Participants:

A total of 89 432 participants, aged 20–78 years (mean =53 years) at baseline and followed for 1.9–12.5 years (mean=6.5 years). All participants were free of self-reported cancer, cardiovascular diseases and diabetes at baseline.

Methods:

Glycaemic index and GL were calculated on the basis of dietary intake assessed by food frequency questionnaires and by using a GI table developed for this study with published GI values as the main sources. Anthropometric data were collected both at baseline and at the end of follow-up. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted in each centre and random-effect meta-analyses were used to combine the effects. Adjustment was made for baseline anthropometrics, demographic and lifestyle factors, follow-up duration and other dietary factors.

Results:

Mean GI and GL were 57 and 134, respectively. Associations of GI and GL with subsequent changes of weight and waist circumference were heterogeneous across centres. Overall, with every 10-unit higher in GI, weight increased by 34 g per year (95% confidence interval (CI): −47, 115) and waist circumference increased by 0.19 cm per year (95% CI: 0.11, 0.27). With every 50-unit higher in GL, weight increased by 10 g per year (95% CI: −65, 85) and waist circumference increased by 0.06 cm per year (95% CI: −0.01, 0.13).

Conclusions:

Our findings do not support an effect of GI or GL on weight change. The positively significant association between GI, not GL, and subsequent gain in waist circumference may imply a beneficial role of lower GI diets in the prevention of abdominal obesity. However, further studies are needed to confirm this finding given the small effect observed in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jenkins DJ, Wolever TM, Taylor RH, Barker H, Fielden H, Baldwin JM et al. Glycemic index of foods: a physiological basis for carbohydrate exchange. Am J Clin Nutr 1981; 34: 362–366.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Salmeron J, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Wing AL, Willett WC . Dietary fiber, glycemic load, and risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women. JAMA 1997; 277: 472–477.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ludwig DS . Dietary glycemic index and the regulation of body weight. Lipids 2003; 38: 117–121.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ball SD, Keller KR, Moyer-Mileur LJ, Ding YW, Donaldson D, Jackson WD . Prolongation of satiety after low versus moderately high glycemic index meals in obese adolescents. Pediatrics 2003; 111: 488–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stevenson EJ, Williams C, Mash LE, Phillips B, Nute ML . Influence of high-carbohydrate mixed meals with different glycemic indexes on substrate utilization during subsequent exercise in women. Am J Clin Nutr 2006; 84: 354–360.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pereira MA, Swain J, Goldfine AB, Rifai N, Ludwig DS . Effects of a low-glycemic load diet on resting energy expenditure and heart disease risk factors during weight loss. JAMA 2004; 292: 2482–2490.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Du H, van der A DL, Feskens EJ . Dietary glycaemic index: a review of the physiological mechanisms and observed health impacts. Acta Cardiol 2006; 61: 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thomas DE, Elliott E, Baur L . Low glycaemic index or low glycaemic load diets for overweight and obesity. Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews 2007. Issue no. 3. Article no.: CD005105.

  9. Aston LM, Stokes CS, Jebb SA . No effect of a diet with a reduced glycaemic index on satiety, energy intake and body weight in overweight and obese women. Int J Obes (Lond) 2008; 32: 160–165.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Das SK, Gilhooly CH, Golden JK, Pittas AG, Fuss PJ, Cheatham RA et al. Long-term effects of 2 energy-restricted diets differing in glycemic load on dietary adherence, body composition, and metabolism in CALERIE: a 1-y randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2007; 85: 1023–1030.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Sichieri R, Moura AS, Genelhu V, Hu F, Willett WC . An 18-mo randomized trial of a low-glycemic-index diet and weight change in Brazilian women. Am J Clin Nutr 2007; 86: 707–713.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. de Rougemont A, Normand S, Nazare JA, Skilton MR, Sothier M, Vinoy S et al. Beneficial effects of a 5-week low-glycaemic index regimen on weight control and cardiovascular risk factors in overweight non-diabetic subjects. Br J Nutr 2007; 98: 1288–1298.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Astrup A, Meinert Larsen T, Harper A . Atkins and other low-carbohydrate diets: hoax or an effective tool for weight loss? Lancet 2004; 364: 897–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Seidell JC, Nooyens AJ, Visscher TL . Cost-effective measures to prevent obesity: epidemiological basis and appropriate target groups. Proc Nutr Soc 2005; 64: 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ma Y, Olendzki B, Chiriboga D, Hebert JR, Li Y, Li W et al. Association between dietary carbohydrates and body weight. Am J Epidemiol 2005; 161: 359–367.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Hare-Bruun H, Flint A, Heitmann BL . Glycemic index and glycemic load in relation to changes in body weight, body fat distribution, and body composition in adult Danes. Am J Clin Nutr 2006; 84: 871–879 quiz 952-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Riboli E, Hunt KJ, Slimani N, Ferrari P, Norat T, Fahey M et al. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): study populations and data collection. Public Health Nutr 2002; 5: 1113–1124.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaaks R, Slimani N, Riboli E . Pilot phase studies on the accuracy of dietary intake measurements in the EPIC project: overall evaluation of results. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Int J Epidemiol 1997; 26: S26–S36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pisani P, Faggiano F, Krogh V, Palli D, Vineis P, Berrino F . Relative validity and reproducibility of a food frequency dietary questionnaire for use in the Italian EPIC centres. Int J Epidemiol 1997; 26: S152–S160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bingham SA, Gill C, Welch A, Cassidy A, Runswick SA, Oakes S et al. Validation of dietary assessment methods in the UK arm of EPIC using weighed records, and 24-hour urinary nitrogen and potassium and serum vitamin C and carotenoids as biomarkers. Int J Epidemiol 1997; 26: S137–S151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bohlscheid-Thomas S, Hoting I, Boeing H, Wahrendorf J . Reproducibility and relative validity of energy and macronutrient intake of a food frequency questionnaire developed for the German part of the EPIC project. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Int J Epidemiol 1997; 26: S71–S81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bohlscheid-Thomas S, Hoting I, Boeing H, Wahrendorf J . Reproducibility and relative validity of food group intake in a food frequency questionnaire developed for the German part of the EPIC project. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Int J Epidemiol 1997; 26: S59–S70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ocke MC, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Pols MA, Smit HA, van Staveren WA, Kromhout D . The Dutch EPIC food frequency questionnaire. II. Relative validity and reproducibility for nutrients. Int J Epidemiol 1997; 26: S49–S58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ocke MC, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Goddijn HE, Jansen A, Pols MA, van Staveren WA et al. The Dutch EPIC food frequency questionnaire. I. Description of the questionnaire, and relative validity and reproducibility for food groups. Int J Epidemiol 1997; 26: S37–S48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. van Bakel MM, Slimani N, Feskens EJ, Du H, Beulens JW, van der Schouw YT et al. Methodological challenges in the application of the glycemic index in epidemiological studies using data from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. J Nutr 2009; 139: 568–575.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Du H, van der A DL, van Bakel MM, van der Kallen CJ, Blaak EE, van Greevenbroek MM et al. Glycemic index and glycemic load in relation to food and nutrient intake and metabolic risk factors in a Dutch population. Am J Clin Nutr 2008; 87: 655–661.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Du H, van der AD, van Bakel MM, Verberne LD, Ocke M, Feskens EJ . Reproducibility and relative validity of dietary glycaemic index and glycaemic load assessed by the food-frequency questionnaire used in the Dutch cohorts of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Br J Nutr 2009; 1–4.

  28. Slimani N, Kaaks R, Ferrari P, Casagrande C, Clavel-Chapelon F, Lotze G et al. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) calibration study: rationale, design and population characteristics. Public Health Nutr 2002; 5: 1125–1145.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ferrari P, Day NE, Boshuizen HC, Roddam A, Hoffmann K, Thiebaut A et al. The evaluation of the diet/disease relation in the EPIC study: considerations for the calibration and the disease models. Int J Epidemiol 2008; 37: 368–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Slimani N, Deharveng G, Charrondiere RU, van Kappel AL, Ocke MC, Welch A et al. Structure of the standardized computerized 24-h diet recall interview used as reference method in the 22 centers participating in the EPIC project. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1999; 58: 251–266.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Slimani N, Deharveng G, Unwin I, Southgate DA, Vignat J, Skeie G et al. The EPIC nutrient database project (ENDB): a first attempt to standardize nutrient databases across the 10 European countries participating in the EPIC study. Eur J Clin Nutr 2007; 61: 1037–1056.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ledikwe JH, Blanck HM, Khan LK, Serdula MK, Seymour JD, Tohill BC et al. Dietary energy density determined by eight calculation methods in a nationally representative United States population. J Nutr 2005; 135: 273–278.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bes-Rastrollo M, van Dam RM, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Li TY, Sampson LL, Hu FB . Prospective study of dietary energy density and weight gain in women. Am J Clin Nutr 2008; 88: 769–777.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Kien CL, Ugrasbul F . Prediction of daily energy expenditure during a feeding trial using measurements of resting energy expenditure, fat-free mass, or Harris-Benedict equations. Am J Clin Nutr 2004; 80: 876–880.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Haftenberger M, Lahmann PH, Panico S, Gonzalez CA, Seidell JC, Boeing H et al. Overweight, obesity and fat distribution in 50- to 64-year-old participants in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Public Health Nutr 2002; 5: 1147–1162.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Willett WC . Nutritional Epidemiology 2nd edn. Oxford University Press: New York, 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. Mason C, Katzmarzyk PT . Variability in waist circumference measurements according to anatomic measurement site. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009. e-pub ahead of print 2 April 2009. doi:10.1038/oby.2009.87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ross R, Freeman J, Hudson R, Janssen I . Abdominal obesity, muscle composition, and insulin resistance in premenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87: 5044–5051.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Despres JP, Lemieux I, Bergeron J, Pibarot P, Mathieu P, Larose E et al. Abdominal obesity and the metabolic syndrome: contribution to global cardiometabolic risk. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2008; 28: 1039–1049.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Mattisson I, Wirfalt E, Aronsson CA, Wallstrom P, Sonestedt E, Gullberg B et al. Misreporting of energy: prevalence, characteristics of misreporters and influence on observed risk estimates in the Malmo Diet and Cancer cohort. Br J Nutr 2005; 94: 832–842.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Day N, Oakes S, Luben R, Khaw KT, Bingham S, Welch A et al. EPIC-Norfolk: study design and characteristics of the cohort. European Prospective Investigation of Cancer. Br J Cancer 1999; 80: 95–103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Verschuren WM, Blokstra A, Picavet HS, Smit HA . Cohort profile: the Doetinchem Cohort Study. Int J Epidemiol 2008; 37: 1236–1241.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Nordmann AJ, Nordmann A, Briel M, Keller U, Yancy Jr WS, Brehm BJ et al. Effects of low-carbohydrate vs low-fat diets on weight loss and cardiovascular risk factors: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 285–293.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Shai I, Schwarzfuchs D, Henkin Y, Shahar DR, Witkow S, Greenberg I et al. Weight loss with a low-carbohydrate, Mediterranean, or low-fat diet. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 229–241.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Saris WH, Astrup A, Prentice AM, Zunft HJ, Formiguera X, Verboeket-van de Venne WP et al. Randomized controlled trial of changes in dietary carbohydrate/fat ratio and simple vs complex carbohydrates on body weight and blood lipids: the CARMEN study. The Carbohydrate Ratio Management in European National diets. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000; 24: 1310–1318.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Astrup A, Grunwald GK, Melanson EL, Saris WH, Hill JO . The role of low-fat diets in body weight control: a meta-analysis of ad libitum dietary intervention studies. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000; 24: 1545–1552.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

DiOGenes is the acronym of the project ‘Diet, Obesity and Genes’ supported by the European Community (Contract no. FOOD-CT-2005-513946). The parties of the project are listed on the web site of the project (http://www.diogenes-eu.org/). This integrated programme was set up to target the issue of obesity from a dietary perspective, seeking new insights and new routes to prevention. We thank the European Prospective Investigation on Cancer and Nutrition (The EPIC project: http://epic.iarc.fr/) for allowing access to the data. HD performed the data analysis and wrote the paper; MB, NGF, JH, MUJ, BB, MS and GM helped with the interpretation of the results and gave critical comments on the paper; WS, TIAS and EF contributed to the conception of the study; and DvdA, NS, NJW, AT, KO, HB, DP, WS, TIAS and EF designed the study, contributed to the acquisition of data and providing funding, helped with the interpretation of the results and gave critical comments on the paper. All authors read and approved the final paper. HD had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H Du.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on International Journal of Obesity website (http://www.nature.com/ijo)

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Du, H., van der A, D., van Bakel, M. et al. Dietary glycaemic index, glycaemic load and subsequent changes of weight and waist circumference in European men and women. Int J Obes 33, 1280–1288 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2009.163

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2009.163

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links