Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

BMI-related errors in the measurement of obesity

International Journal of Obesity volume 32, pages S56–S59 (2008)Cite this article

Abstract

Body mass index (BMI) has various deficiencies as a measure of obesity, especially when the BMI measure is based on self-reported height and weight. BMI is an indirect measure of body fat compared with more direct approaches such as bioelectrical impedance. Moreover, BMI does not necessarily reflect the changes that occur with age. The proportion of body fat increases with age, whereas muscle mass decreases, but corresponding changes in height, weight and BMI may not reflect changes in body fat and muscle mass. Both the sensitivity and specificity of BMI have been shown to be poor. Additionally, the relation between BMI and percentage of body fat is not linear and differs for men and women. The consequences of the errors in the measurement of obesity with BMI depend on whether they are differential or nondifferential. Differential misclassification, a potentially greater problem in case–control and cross-sectional studies than in prospective cohort studies, can produce a bias toward or away from the null. Nondifferential misclassification produces a bias toward the null for a dichotomous exposure; for measures of exposure that are not dichotomous, the bias may be away from the null. In short, the use of BMI as a measure of obesity can introduce misclassification problems that may result in important bias in estimating the effects related to obesity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

References

  1. Cohn SH . New concepts of body composition. In: Ellis KJ, Yasumura S, Morgan WD (eds) In Vivo Body Composition Studies. The Institute of Physical Sciences in Medicine: London, 1987. pp 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jackson AS, Stanforth PR, Gagnon J, Rankinen T, Leon AS, Rao DC et al. The effect of sex, age and race on estimating percentage body fat from body mass index: The Heritage Family Study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002; 26: 789–796.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nawaz H, Chan W, Abdulrahman M, Larson D, Katz DL . Self-reported weight and height: implications for obesity research. Am J Prev Med 2001; 20: 294–298.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Deurenberg P, Andreoli A, Borg P, Kukkonen-Harjula K, de Lorenzo A, van Marken Lichtenbelt WD et al. The validity of predicted body fat percentage from body mass index and from impedance in samples of five European populations. Eur J Clin Nutr 2001; 55: 973–979.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA

    K J Rothman

Authors
  1. K J Rothman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K J Rothman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rothman, K. BMI-related errors in the measurement of obesity. Int J Obes 32 (Suppl 3), S56–S59 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2008.87

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2008.87

Keywords

  • measurement error
  • body mass index
  • misclassification
  • bias

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links