Original Article | Published:

Relationship between sexual position and severity of penile fracture

International Journal of Impotence Research volume 29, pages 207209 (2017) | Download Citation

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate the relationship between the sexual position and severity of penile fracture (PF). We studied 90 patients with PF. The mechanism of injury and the sexual position was assessed. We divided our sample by the etiology of the fracture in six groups: (a) masturbation or penile manipulation; (b) ‘man-on-top’ position; (c) ‘doggy style’ position; (d) ‘woman-on-top’ position; (d) blunt trauma; and (e) ‘rolling over’ fracture. We used the χ2-test for contingency analysis of the populations under study (P<0.05). The patient’s age ranged from 18 to 66 years (mean 39 years). Investigation of the injury mechanism identified sexual trauma as the main etiological factor, involved in 69 cases (76.5%). The sexual position at the time of injury varied, with 23 cases (25.5%) occurring in the ‘man-on-top’, 37cases (41%) in the ‘doggy style’ and 9 cases (10%) in the ‘woman-on-top’. We do not observe differences between the severity of the PF between the ‘doggy style’ and ‘man-on-top’ (P=0.9595), but the ‘doggy style’ had more severity of PF when compared with ‘woman-on-top’ (P=0.0396) and penile manipulation (P=0.0026). The ‘man-on-top’ and ‘doggy style’ positions showed more associations with bilateral fractures of the corpus cavernosum and urethral lesions.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , , , . Long-term experience with surgical and conservative treatment of penile fracture. J Urol 2004; 172: 576–579.

  2. 2.

    , . Genital and lower urinary trauma. In: , , , (eds). Campbell-Walsh Urology, 10th edn. WB Saunders: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2012, pp 2507–2508.

  3. 3.

    . Evaluation of epidemiology, concomitant urethral disruption and seasonal variation of penile fracture: a report of 86 cases. Can Urol Assoc J 2013; 7: 9–10.

  4. 4.

    , , , , . Penile fracture-experience in 56 cases. Int Braz J Urol 2003; 29: 35–39.

  5. 5.

    , , . Review of Cleveland Clinic experience with penile fracture. Urology 1999; 54: 352–355.

  6. 6.

    . Penile fracture in Kermanshah, Iran: report of 172 cases. J Urol 2000; 164: 364–366.

  7. 7.

    , , . Urethrography and cavernosography imaging in a small series of penile fractures: a comparison with surgical findings. Urology 1998; 51: 616–619.

  8. 8.

    , , , , . Penile fracture and magnetic resonance imaging. Int Braz J Urol 2012; 38: 287–288.

  9. 9.

    , , , , . Penile fracture: diagnosis, treatment and outcomes of 150 patients. Urology 2010; 76: 1488–1492.

  10. 10.

    , , , , . Surgical management of penile fracture and long-term outcome on erectile function and voiding. J Sex Med 2013; 10: 1424–1430.

  11. 11.

    , , , , , et al. Sexual function outcomes following fracture of the penis. Can Urol Assoc J. 2013; 7: 252–257.

  12. 12.

    . Penile fracture in Kermanshah, Iran: the long-term results of surgical treatment. BJU Int 2002; 89: 890–894.

  13. 13.

    . Sexual function and tunica albuginea wound healing following penile fracture: an 18-year follow-up study of 352 patients from Kermanshah, Iran. J Sex Med 2009; 6: 1141–1150.

  14. 14.

    , , , , , et al. Penile fracture: retrospective analysis of our case history with long-term assessment of the erectile and sexological outcome. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2014; 86: 359–370.

  15. 15.

    , , , , , . Mechanisms predisposing penile fracture and long-term outcomes on erectile and voiding functions. Adv Urol 2014; 2014: 768158.

  16. 16.

    , , , , , et al. Penile Fracture: a meta-analysis. Urol Int 2016; 96: 315–329.

  17. 17.

    , , , , . Fracture of the penis: surgical management. Int Surg 1988; 73: 63–64.

  18. 18.

    , , , . Increase in fracture of the penis in south-west Nigeria. Arab J Urol 2012; 10: 440–444.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Souza Aguiar Municipal Hospital, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    • R Barros
    • , L Schulze
    • , A A Ornellas
    • , L Koifman
    •  & L A Favorito
  2. Urogenital Research Unit, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    • R Barros
    • , L Schulze
    • , A A Ornellas
    • , L Koifman
    •  & L A Favorito

Authors

  1. Search for R Barros in:

  2. Search for L Schulze in:

  3. Search for A A Ornellas in:

  4. Search for L Koifman in:

  5. Search for L A Favorito in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L A Favorito.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Revised

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2017.24